↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SEU427+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:26:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.30s 1.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU427+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 08:35:46 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.38  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___300_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.13/0.38  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.38  #
% 0.13/0.38  # Number of axioms: 70 Number of unprocessed: 70
% 0.13/0.38  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.38  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.38  # Hello from C++
% 0.20/0.38  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.20/0.38  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.20/0.38  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.20/0.38  # 70 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.20/0.38  # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures.
% 0.20/0.38  # There are 5 start rule candidates:
% 0.20/0.38  # Found 33 unit axioms.
% 0.20/0.38  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.20/0.38  # 5 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.20/0.38  # 37 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.20/0.38  # 33 unit axiom clauses
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.20/0.38  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5
% 0.20/0.38  # Returning from population with 26 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.20/0.38  # We now have 26 tableaux to operate on
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 8.30/1.45  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 8.30/1.45  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.30/1.45  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.30/1.45  # Begin clausification derivation
% 8.30/1.45  
% 8.30/1.45  # End clausification derivation
% 8.30/1.45  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (v1_xboole_0(esk10_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (v1_relat_1(k1_xboole_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (v1_relat_1(k1_xboole_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (v1_relat_1(esk10_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (v1_relat_1(esk13_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (v1_relat_1(esk15_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (v3_relat_1(k1_xboole_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (v3_relat_1(esk15_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(esk13_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (X1=k1_xboole_0|~v1_xboole_0(X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (v1_xboole_0(esk14_1(X1)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (v1_relat_1(X1)|~v1_xboole_0(X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_68, plain, (k2_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0)=X1)).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_66, plain, (r1_tarski(X1,X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (k2_xboole_0(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (X1=X2|~v1_xboole_0(X2)|~v1_xboole_0(X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (m1_subset_1(esk8_1(X1),X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (m1_eqrel_1(k3_pua2mss1(X1),X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (m1_eqrel_1(esk6_1(X1),X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (v1_xboole_0(X1)|~v1_xboole_0(esk11_1(X1)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (m1_subset_1(esk14_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (k2_xboole_0(X1,X2)=k2_xboole_0(X2,X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(X2)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (v1_relat_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (v1_relat_1(esk12_2(X1,X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (v1_funct_1(esk12_2(X1,X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (v1_xboole_0(X1)|m1_subset_1(esk11_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,X2)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2))|~v1_relat_1(X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2))|~v1_relat_1(X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (v1_xboole_0(X2)|r2_hidden(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~r1_tarski(X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (v1_relat_1(k2_xboole_0(X1,X2))|~v1_relat_1(X2)|~v1_relat_1(X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (~r2_hidden(X2,X1)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (r1_tarski(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))|~m1_eqrel_1(X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (k2_xboole_0(k3_pua2mss1(X1),k3_pua2mss1(X2))=k3_pua2mss1(k2_xboole_0(X1,X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (v1_xboole_0(X2)|v1_xboole_0(X1)|~v1_xboole_0(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (m1_subset_1(esk5_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(X3)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,X3)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (m2_relset_1(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (m1_relset_1(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (m1_relset_1(esk12_2(X1,X2),X1,X2))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(X2,X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_67, plain, (k2_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X1,X3))=k9_relat_1(X1,k2_xboole_0(X2,X3))|~v1_relat_1(X1))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (v1_relat_1(X1)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (k4_subset_1(X2,X1,X1)=X1|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (k4_subset_1(X2,X1,X3)=k2_xboole_0(X1,X3)|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)|~m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)|~m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))|~m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (k4_subset_1(X2,X1,X3)=k4_subset_1(X2,X3,X1)|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (k6_relset_2(X3,X2,X1)=k5_relset_2(X2,X1)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (m1_subset_1(k4_subset_1(X2,X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (v1_funct_1(k6_relset_2(X1,X2,X3))|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X1))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (v1_funct_2(k6_relset_2(X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X2),k1_zfmisc_1(X1))|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X1))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (m2_relset_1(k6_relset_2(X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X2),k1_zfmisc_1(X1))|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X1))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_relset_2(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk5_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk3_0))=k1_xboole_0)).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (k4_relset_2(X2,X3,X1,X4)=k9_relat_1(X1,X4)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (k7_relset_2(X2,X4,X1,X3)=k8_relset_2(X2,X4,X1,X3)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X4))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (m1_subset_1(k8_relset_2(X2,X4,X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X4))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X4))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (m1_subset_1(k4_relset_2(X2,X3,X1,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,k4_subset_1(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0)!=k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0,esk5_0))).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (k8_setfam_1(X4,k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X2),X4,k6_relset_2(X4,X2,X3),k3_pua2mss1(X1)))=k7_relset_2(X2,X4,X1,X3)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X4))))).
% 8.30/1.45  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 8.30/1.45  # Begin printing tableau
% 8.30/1.45  # Found 5 steps
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))), inference(start_rule)).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_83, plain, (m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_70])).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_364, plain, (v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_39])).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_365, plain, (r2_hidden(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 8.30/1.45  cnf(i_0_392, plain, (~r2_hidden(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk3_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_392, ...])).
% 8.30/1.45  # End printing tableau
% 8.30/1.45  # SZS output end
% 8.30/1.45  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 8.30/1.45  # Child (4123) has found a proof.
% 8.30/1.45  
% 8.30/1.45  # Proof search is over...
% 8.30/1.45  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------