↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU427+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:12:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 55.75s 38.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 55.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  28   ~;  24   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   2 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t26_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
     => ! [X4] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
         => ! [X5] :
              ( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
             => ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X5),k3_pua2mss1(X3)) = k1_xboole_0
               => k8_relset_2(X1,X2,k4_subset_1(X1,X3,X4),X5) = k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X4,X5) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_relset_2) ).

fof(t23_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
     => ! [X4] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
         => ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X4),k3_pua2mss1(X3)) = k1_xboole_0
          <=> X3 = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_relset_2) ).

fof(d2_pua2mss1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : k3_pua2mss1(X1) = k8_eqrel_1(X1,k6_partfun1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+441.ax',d2_pua2mss1) ).

fof(t12_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
     => k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(t93_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2)) = k2_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+6.ax',t93_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(redefinition_k4_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
        & m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) )
     => k4_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',redefinition_k4_subset_1) ).

fof(t4_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',t4_subset_1) ).

fof(t2_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : r1_tarski(k1_xboole_0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t2_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
       => ! [X4] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
           => ! [X5] :
                ( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
               => ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X5),k3_pua2mss1(X3)) = k1_xboole_0
                 => k8_relset_2(X1,X2,k4_subset_1(X1,X3,X4),X5) = k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X4,X5) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1492,X1493,X1494,X1495] :
      ( ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1492),X1493,k6_relset_2(X1493,X1492,X1495),k3_pua2mss1(X1494)) != k1_xboole_0
        | X1494 = k1_xboole_0
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X1495,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1492,X1493)))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X1494,k1_zfmisc_1(X1492)) )
      & ( X1494 != k1_xboole_0
        | k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1492),X1493,k6_relset_2(X1493,X1492,X1495),k3_pua2mss1(X1494)) = k1_xboole_0
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X1495,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1492,X1493)))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X1494,k1_zfmisc_1(X1492)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_relset_2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1496] : k3_pua2mss1(X1496) = k8_eqrel_1(X1496,k6_partfun1(X1496)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d2_pua2mss1]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    & m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    & m1_subset_1(esk5_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    & k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_relset_2(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk5_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk3_0)) = k1_xboole_0
    & k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,k4_subset_1(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X4 = k1_xboole_0
    | k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X3),k3_pua2mss1(X4)) != k1_xboole_0
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    k3_pua2mss1(X1) = k8_eqrel_1(X1,k6_partfun1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_relset_2(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk5_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk3_0)) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2123,X2124] :
      ( ~ r1_tarski(X2123,X2124)
      | k2_xboole_0(X2123,X2124) = X2124 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X2513,X2514] : k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X2513,X2514)) = k2_xboole_0(X2513,X2514),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t93_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1402,X1403,X1404] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1403,k1_zfmisc_1(X1402))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X1404,k1_zfmisc_1(X1402))
      | k4_subset_1(X1402,X1403,X1404) = k2_xboole_0(X1403,X1404) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k4_subset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X4 = k1_xboole_0
    | k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X3),k8_eqrel_1(X4,k6_partfun1(X4))) != k1_xboole_0
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_relset_2(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk5_0),k8_eqrel_1(esk3_0,k6_partfun1(esk3_0))) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk5_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2)) = k2_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( k4_subset_1(X2,X1,X3) = k2_xboole_0(X1,X3)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,k4_subset_1(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( k4_subset_1(X2,X1,X3) = k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X3))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X1450] : m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1450)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t4_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X1430] : r1_tarski(k1_xboole_0,X1430),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,k4_subset_1(esk1_0,k1_xboole_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( k4_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = X3
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    r1_tarski(k1_xboole_0,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : SEU427+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.18/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 03:12:41 EDT 2026
% 0.18/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.36  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 55.75/38.77  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 55.75/38.77  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 55.75/38.77  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 55.75/38.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 55.95/38.92  % Total time : 33.255s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------