↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU439+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:25:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 165.49s 28.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 165.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  169 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  191 (  72   ~;  84   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  130 (   2 sgn  69   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t43_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
     => ! [X4] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
         => ( X3 != k1_xboole_0
           => r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),k9_relat_1(X4,X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t43_relset_2) ).

fof(t24_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
     => ! [X5] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
         => ( r2_hidden(X3,k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X4,X5))
           => ! [X6] :
                ( r2_hidden(X6,X4)
               => r2_hidden(X3,k9_relat_1(X5,k1_tarski(X6))) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_relset_2) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( r2_hidden(X3,X1)
         => r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d13_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X1)
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( X3 = k9_relat_1(X1,X2)
        <=> ! [X4] :
              ( r2_hidden(X4,X3)
            <=> ? [X5] :
                  ( r2_hidden(X5,X2)
                  & r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X5,X4),X1) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d13_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k4_tarski(X1,X2) = k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2),k1_tarski(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(t9_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X3)
     => ( r2_hidden(X1,k9_relat_1(X3,k1_tarski(X2)))
      <=> r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X2,X1),X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t9_relset_2) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
     => ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
        | v1_xboole_0(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).

fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] : m1_subset_1(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).

fof(cc1_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
     => v1_relat_1(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_relset_1) ).

fof(t6_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
     => X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
       => ! [X4] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
           => ( X3 != k1_xboole_0
             => r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),k9_relat_1(X4,X3)) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t43_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X113,X114,X115,X116,X117,X118] :
      ( r2_hidden(X115,k9_relat_1(X117,k1_tarski(X118)))
      | ~ r2_hidden(X118,X116)
      | ~ r2_hidden(X115,k8_relset_2(X113,X114,X116,X117))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X117,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X113,X114)))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X116,k1_zfmisc_1(X113)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t24_relset_2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X35,X36,X37,X38,X39] :
      ( ( r1_tarski(X38,X39)
        | ~ r2_hidden(esk9_2(X38,X39),X39) )
      & ( r1_tarski(X38,X39)
        | r2_hidden(esk9_2(X38,X39),X38) )
      & ( r2_hidden(X37,X36)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X37,X35)
        | ~ r1_tarski(X35,X36) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
       => ! [X4] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
           => ( X3 != k1_xboole_0
             => r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),k9_relat_1(X4,X3)) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(X6,X1)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X5,k8_relset_2(X2,X4,X1,X3))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X4)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | r2_hidden(X5,k9_relat_1(X3,k1_tarski(X6))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),k9_relat_1(esk4_0,esk3_0))
    & esk3_0 != k1_xboole_0
    & m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    & m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X21,X22,X24,X25,X26,X27,X29] :
      ( ( ~ v1_relat_1(X19)
        | X27 = k9_relat_1(X19,X26)
        | r2_hidden(esk6_3(X19,X26,X27),X27)
        | r2_hidden(esk7_3(X19,X26,X27),X26) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X19)
        | X27 = k9_relat_1(X19,X26)
        | r2_hidden(esk6_3(X19,X26,X27),X27)
        | r2_hidden(k4_tarski(esk7_3(X19,X26,X27),esk6_3(X19,X26,X27)),X19) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X19)
        | X27 = k9_relat_1(X19,X26)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X29,X26)
        | ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X29,esk6_3(X19,X26,X27)),X19)
        | ~ r2_hidden(esk6_3(X19,X26,X27),X27) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X19)
        | X21 != k9_relat_1(X19,X20)
        | r2_hidden(X24,X21)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X25,X20)
        | ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X25,X24),X19) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X19)
        | X21 != k9_relat_1(X19,X20)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X22,X21)
        | r2_hidden(esk5_4(X19,X20,X21,X22),X20) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X19)
        | X21 != k9_relat_1(X19,X20)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X22,X21)
        | r2_hidden(k4_tarski(esk5_4(X19,X20,X21,X22),X22),X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d13_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X45,X46] : k4_tarski(X45,X46) = k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X45,X46),k1_tarski(X45)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X134,X135,X136] :
      ( ( ~ v1_relat_1(X136)
        | r2_hidden(X134,k9_relat_1(X136,k1_tarski(X135)))
        | ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X135,X134),X136) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X136)
        | r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X135,X134),X136)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X134,k9_relat_1(X136,k1_tarski(X135))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t9_relset_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X6,X3)
    | r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),k9_relat_1(X4,k1_tarski(X6))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X119,X120] :
      ( r2_hidden(X119,X120)
      | v1_xboole_0(X120)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X119,X120) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X73] : m1_subset_1(esk12_1(X73),X73),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[existence_m1_subset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X1,X2),X3)
    | r2_hidden(X2,X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    k4_tarski(X1,X2) = k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2),k1_tarski(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,k9_relat_1(X2,k1_tarski(X3)))
    | r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X3,X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X3,X1)
    | r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,X1,esk4_0),X2)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,X1,esk4_0),X2),k9_relat_1(esk4_0,k1_tarski(X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
    | r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | v1_xboole_0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    m1_subset_1(esk12_1(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X16)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X16,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X14,X15))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc1_relset_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2),k1_tarski(X1)),X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X4)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | r2_hidden(X2,X5) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(X1,k9_relat_1(X2,k1_tarski(X3)))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X3,X1),k1_tarski(X3)),X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(X2,esk3_0)
    | r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1),k9_relat_1(esk4_0,k1_tarski(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(esk12_1(X1),X1)
    | v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(X5,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,k9_relat_1(X3,k1_tarski(X5)))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1),k9_relat_1(esk4_0,k1_tarski(esk12_1(esk3_0))))
    | v1_xboole_0(esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk4_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(esk12_1(esk3_0),X3)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(esk4_0,X3)
    | r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1),X2)
    | v1_xboole_0(esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( X2 != k9_relat_1(esk4_0,esk3_0)
    | r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1),X2)
    | v1_xboole_0(esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_35]) ).

fof(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X129] :
      ( X129 = k1_xboole_0
      | ~ v1_xboole_0(X129) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_boole])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(esk9_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1)
    | r2_hidden(esk9_2(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),X1),k9_relat_1(esk4_0,esk3_0))
    | v1_xboole_0(esk3_0) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),k9_relat_1(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    v1_xboole_0(esk3_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 != k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU439+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.44  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:31:19 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 165.49/28.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 165.49/28.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 165.49/28.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2467474 completed with status 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 165.49/28.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 165.49/28.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 165.49/28.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 165.49/28.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 165.49/28.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 369s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2467481 completed with status 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 165.49/28.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 165.49/28.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 165.49/28.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 165.49/28.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 165.49/28.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 369s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 165.49/28.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 165.49/28.63  
% 165.49/28.63  % Proof found!
% 165.49/28.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 165.49/28.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 165.49/28.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 60
% 165.49/28.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Initial clauses                      : 87
% 165.49/28.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 11
% 165.49/28.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 76
% 165.49/28.63  % Processed clauses                    : 8775
% 165.49/28.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 52
% 165.49/28.63  % ...subsumed                          : 4565
% 165.49/28.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 4158
% 165.49/28.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 188
% 165.49/28.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 59
% 165.49/28.63  % Generated clauses                    : 459102
% 165.49/28.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 454646
% 165.49/28.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 69
% 165.49/28.63  % Paramodulations                      : 458796
% 165.49/28.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 285
% 165.49/28.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 20945
% 165.49/28.63  % ...of those cached                   : 20290
% 165.49/28.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 165.49/28.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 165.49/28.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 165.49/28.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 165.49/28.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 165.49/28.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3890
% 165.49/28.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 196
% 165.49/28.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 165.49/28.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 55
% 165.49/28.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3638
% 165.49/28.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 445135
% 165.49/28.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2253441
% 165.49/28.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 269
% 165.49/28.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1772223
% 165.49/28.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 621916
% 165.49/28.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3391
% 165.49/28.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37342
% 165.49/28.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 371
% 165.49/28.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 23
% 165.49/28.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 165.49/28.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 16212211
% 165.49/28.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 950
% 165.49/28.63  
% 165.49/28.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 165.49/28.63  % User time                : 26.906 s
% 165.49/28.63  % System time              : 0.797 s
% 165.49/28.63  % Total time               : 27.703 s
% 165.49/28.63  % Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
% 165.49/28.63  
% 165.49/28.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 165.49/28.63  % User time                : 133.017 s
% 165.49/28.63  % System time              : 4.155 s
% 165.49/28.63  % Total time               : 137.172 s
% 165.49/28.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 165.49/28.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------