↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU444+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:25:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.65s 2.04s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  40   ~;  30   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (   4 sgn  48   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t56_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1)
     => ( k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k10_relset_1(X2,X1,X3,X2)) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k2_funct_5(X3))
        & k1_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t56_relset_2) ).

fof(t51_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1)
     => ( k2_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X2,X1,X3,X2)
        & k1_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t51_relset_2) ).

fof(dt_k6_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
     => m2_relset_1(k6_relset_1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',dt_k6_relset_1) ).

fof(redefinition_k6_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
     => k6_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k4_relat_1(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',redefinition_k6_relset_1) ).

fof(redefinition_m2_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m2_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
    <=> m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',redefinition_m2_relset_1) ).

fof(t21_funct_5,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X1)
     => ( k2_funct_5(X1) = k2_relat_1(X1)
        & k1_funct_5(X1) = k1_relat_1(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+61.ax',t21_funct_5) ).

fof(cc1_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
     => v1_relat_1(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',cc1_relset_1) ).

fof(dt_m2_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m2_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
     => m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',dt_m2_relset_1) ).

fof(t37_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X1)
     => ( k1_relat_1(X1) = k2_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1))
        & k2_relat_1(X1) = k1_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+10.ax',t37_relat_1) ).

fof(dt_k4_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X1)
     => v1_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+10.ax',dt_k4_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1)
       => ( k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k10_relset_1(X2,X1,X3,X2)) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k2_funct_5(X3))
          & k1_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t56_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k10_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0)) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k2_funct_5(esk3_0))
      | k1_funct_5(esk3_0) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0) )
    & m2_relset_1(esk3_0,esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X114,X115,X116] :
      ( ( ~ m2_relset_1(X116,X115,X114)
        | k2_funct_5(X116) = k10_relset_1(X115,X114,X116,X115) )
      & ( ~ m2_relset_1(X116,X115,X114)
        | k1_funct_5(X116) = k10_relset_1(X114,X115,k6_relset_1(X115,X114,X116),X114) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t51_relset_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k10_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0)) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k2_funct_5(esk3_0))
    | k1_funct_5(esk3_0) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | k2_funct_5(X1) = k10_relset_1(X2,X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk3_0,esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0) != k1_funct_5(esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X105,X106,X107] :
      ( m2_relset_1(k6_relset_1(X105,X106,X107),X106,X105)
      | ~ m1_relset_1(X107,X105,X106) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relset_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | k2_funct_5(k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)) != k1_funct_5(esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | m2_relset_1(k6_relset_1(X2,X3,X1),X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X111,X112,X113] :
      ( k6_relset_1(X111,X112,X113) = k4_relat_1(X113)
      | ~ m1_relset_1(X113,X111,X112) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k6_relset_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_relset_1(esk3_0,esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | k2_funct_5(k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)) != k1_funct_5(esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | k6_relset_1(X2,X3,X1) = k4_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X566,X567,X568] :
      ( ( m2_relset_1(X568,X566,X567)
        | ~ m1_relset_1(X568,X566,X567) )
      & ( m1_relset_1(X568,X566,X567)
        | ~ m2_relset_1(X568,X566,X567) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_m2_relset_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_relset_1(esk3_0,esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | k2_funct_5(k4_relat_1(esk3_0)) != k1_funct_5(esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X83] :
      ( ( ~ v1_relat_1(X83)
        | k2_funct_5(X83) = k2_relat_1(X83) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X83)
        | k1_funct_5(X83) = k1_relat_1(X83) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t21_funct_5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X546,X547,X548] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X548)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X548,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X546,X547))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc1_relset_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X549,X550,X551] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X551,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X549,X550)))
      | ~ m2_relset_1(X551,X549,X550) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_relset_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    k2_funct_5(k4_relat_1(esk3_0)) != k1_funct_5(esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | k2_funct_5(X1) = k2_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X1870] :
      ( ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1870)
        | k1_relat_1(X1870) = k2_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1870)) )
      & ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1870)
        | k2_relat_1(X1870) = k1_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1870)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_relat_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X1883] :
      ( v1_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1883))
      | ~ v1_relat_1(X1883) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k4_relat_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(k4_relat_1(esk3_0))
    | k2_relat_1(k4_relat_1(esk3_0)) != k1_funct_5(esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | k1_relat_1(X1) = k2_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | v1_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | k1_funct_5(X1) = k1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_15]),c_0_40]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEU444+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.47  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.47  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:34:02 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.47  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.65/2.04  % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.65/2.04  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.65/2.04  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with 300s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % new_bool_1 with pid 2261806 completed with status 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 5.65/2.04  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.65/2.04  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.65/2.04  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.65/2.04  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.65/2.04  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_1 with 91s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 68s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2261812 completed with status 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Result found by C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 5.65/2.04  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.65/2.04  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.65/2.04  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.65/2.04  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.65/2.04  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting new_bool_1 with 91s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 68s (1) cores
% 5.65/2.04  % Preprocessing time       : 0.032 s
% 5.65/2.04  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.65/2.04  
% 5.65/2.04  % Proof found!
% 5.65/2.04  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.65/2.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.65/2.04  % Parsed axioms                        : 4528
% 5.65/2.04  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3462
% 5.65/2.04  % Initial clauses                      : 1948
% 5.65/2.04  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 43
% 5.65/2.04  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1905
% 5.65/2.04  % Processed clauses                    : 7584
% 5.65/2.04  % ...of these trivial                  : 61
% 5.65/2.04  % ...subsumed                          : 3851
% 5.65/2.04  % ...remaining for further processing  : 3672
% 5.65/2.04  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 346
% 5.65/2.04  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Backward-subsumed                    : 61
% 5.65/2.04  % Backward-rewritten                   : 60
% 5.65/2.04  % Generated clauses                    : 24536
% 5.65/2.04  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20920
% 5.65/2.04  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 95
% 5.65/2.04  % Paramodulations                      : 24197
% 5.65/2.04  % Factorizations                       : 1
% 5.65/2.04  % NegExts                              : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Equation resolutions                 : 351
% 5.65/2.04  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Total rewrite steps                  : 12135
% 5.65/2.04  % ...of those cached                   : 10821
% 5.65/2.04  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 5.65/2.04  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 5.65/2.04  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 5.65/2.04  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 5.65/2.04  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 5.65/2.04  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1580
% 5.65/2.04  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 340
% 5.65/2.04  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 5.65/2.04  %    Negative unit clauses             : 296
% 5.65/2.04  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 940
% 5.65/2.04  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16800
% 5.65/2.04  % ...number of literals in the above   : 39456
% 5.65/2.04  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1874
% 5.65/2.04  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1232932
% 5.65/2.04  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 400484
% 5.65/2.04  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1410
% 5.65/2.04  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37322
% 5.65/2.04  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 418
% 5.65/2.04  % BW rewrite match successes           : 311
% 5.65/2.04  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.65/2.04  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 459598
% 5.65/2.04  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 58996
% 5.65/2.04  
% 5.65/2.04  % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.65/2.04  % User time                : 1.063 s
% 5.65/2.04  % System time              : 0.057 s
% 5.65/2.04  % Total time               : 1.120 s
% 5.65/2.04  % Maximum resident set size: 15620 pages
% 5.65/2.04  
% 5.65/2.04  % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.65/2.04  % User time                : 2.651 s
% 5.65/2.04  % System time              : 0.162 s
% 5.65/2.04  % Total time               : 2.813 s
% 5.65/2.04  % Maximum resident set size: 10240 pages
% 5.65/2.04  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------