↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU465^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 0.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  290 (  24   ~;  37   |;  21   &; 194   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   6   ^;  43   !;   0   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
    subrel: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_35,type,
    trans: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_52,type,
    epred1_0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_53,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_54,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    epred2_0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_56,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_57,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(decl_58,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

thf(decl_59,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

thf(decl_60,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

thf(transitive_closure_is_transitive5,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( trans @ X2 )
        & ( subrel @ X1 @ X2 )
        & ( ( ( trans @ X2 )
            & ( subrel @ X1 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
     => ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jh8cEsRVuj/E---3.1_1070545.p',transitive_closure_is_transitive5) ).

thf(transitive,axiom,
    ( trans
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
            & ( X1 @ X4 @ X6 ) )
         => ( X1 @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jh8cEsRVuj/E---3.1_1070545.p',transitive) ).

thf(subrel,axiom,
    ( subrel
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
         => ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jh8cEsRVuj/E---3.1_1070545.p',subrel) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( trans @ X2 )
          & ( subrel @ X1 @ X2 )
          & ( ( ( trans @ X2 )
              & ( subrel @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           => ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[transitive_closure_is_transitive5]) ).

thf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( trans
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
          ( ( ( Z0 @ X3 @ X4 )
            & ( Z0 @ X4 @ X6 ) )
         => ( Z0 @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitive]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( subrel
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X3 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subrel]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X42: $i,X43: $i,X44: $i] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X42 @ X43 )
                & ( X2 @ X43 @ X44 ) )
             => ( X2 @ X42 @ X44 ) )
          & ! [X45: $i,X46: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ X45 @ X46 )
             => ( X2 @ X45 @ X46 ) )
          & ( ( ! [X47: $i,X48: $i,X49: $i] :
                  ( ( ( X2 @ X47 @ X48 )
                    & ( X2 @ X48 @ X49 ) )
                 => ( X2 @ X47 @ X49 ) )
              & ! [X50: $i,X51: $i] :
                  ( ( X1 @ X50 @ X51 )
                 => ( X2 @ X50 @ X51 ) ) )
           => ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X56: $i,X57: $i,X58: $i,X59: $i,X60: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ X56 @ X57 )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X57 @ X58 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ X56 @ X58 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X59 @ X60 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ X59 @ X60 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ X3 @ X6 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X4 @ X6 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_9]),c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_9]),c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X3 @ esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_9]),c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU465^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:42:49 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jh8cEsRVuj/E---3.1_1070545.p
% 0.27/0.26  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.27/0.26  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSA.
% 0.27/0.26  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % new_bool_2 with pid 1070561 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Result found by new_bool_2
% 0.27/0.26  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSA.
% 0.27/0.26  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.26  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.26  % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.27/0.26  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1070563 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/0.26  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSA.
% 0.27/0.26  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.26  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.26  % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.27/0.26  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.26  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.27/0.26  
% 0.27/0.26  % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.26  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/0.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.26  % Parsed axioms                        : 59
% 0.27/0.26  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 51
% 0.27/0.26  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.27/0.26  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.27/0.26  % Processed clauses                    : 13
% 0.27/0.26  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 0.27/0.26  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.27/0.26  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.27/0.26  % Generated clauses                    : 7
% 0.27/0.26  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.27/0.26  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.27/0.26  % Paramodulations                      : 7
% 0.27/0.26  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.27/0.26  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.27/0.26  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26  % Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.27/0.26  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.27/0.26  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.26  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.27/0.26  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.27/0.26  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.27/0.26  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2
% 0.27/0.26  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.27/0.26  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.27/0.26  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.27/0.26  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.27/0.26  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.27/0.26  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.27/0.26  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.27/0.26  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/0.26  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1746
% 0.27/0.26  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 651
% 0.27/0.26  
% 0.27/0.26  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.26  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.27/0.26  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.27/0.26  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.27/0.26  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.27/0.26  
% 0.27/0.26  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.26  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.27/0.26  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.27/0.26  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.27/0.26  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.26  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------