%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU467^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:53 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 141 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 12 &; 100 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 17 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 49 ( 49 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 18 ^; 46 !; 0 ?; 64 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
subrel: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
infl: ( ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_35,type,
trans: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_36,type,
tc: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_52,type,
epred1_0: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_53,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_54,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_55,type,
epred2_0: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(transitive_closure,axiom,
( tc
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
! [X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( trans @ X2 )
& ( subrel @ X1 @ X2 ) )
=> ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mdEBNUmknp/E---3.1_4009193.p',transitive_closure) ).
thf(transitive,axiom,
( trans
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
& ( X1 @ X4 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mdEBNUmknp/E---3.1_4009193.p',transitive) ).
thf(subrel,axiom,
( subrel
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
=> ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mdEBNUmknp/E---3.1_4009193.p',subrel) ).
thf(inflationary,axiom,
( infl
= ( ^ [X5: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i > $i > $o] : ( subrel @ X1 @ ( X5 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mdEBNUmknp/E---3.1_4009193.p',inflationary) ).
thf(transitive_closure_op_is_inflationary,conjecture,
infl @ tc,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mdEBNUmknp/E---3.1_4009193.p',transitive_closure_op_is_inflationary) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
( tc
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
! [X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X11: $i,X12: $i,X13: $i] :
( ( ( X2 @ X11 @ X12 )
& ( X2 @ X12 @ X13 ) )
=> ( X2 @ X11 @ X13 ) )
& ! [X14: $i,X15: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X14 @ X15 )
=> ( X2 @ X14 @ X15 ) ) )
=> ( X2 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitive_closure]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
( trans
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( ( Z0 @ X3 @ X4 )
& ( Z0 @ X4 @ X6 ) )
=> ( Z0 @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitive]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
( subrel
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X3 @ X4 )
=> ( Z1 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subrel]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
( infl
= ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X9: $i,X10: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X9 @ X10 )
=> ( Z0 @ X1 @ X9 @ X10 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inflationary]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( infl @ tc ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[transitive_closure_op_is_inflationary]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( tc
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
! [X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X11: $i,X12: $i,X13: $i] :
( ( ( X2 @ X11 @ X12 )
& ( X2 @ X12 @ X13 ) )
=> ( X2 @ X11 @ X13 ) )
& ! [X14: $i,X15: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X14 @ X15 )
=> ( X2 @ X14 @ X15 ) ) )
=> ( X2 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( infl
= ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X9: $i,X10: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X9 @ X10 )
=> ( Z0 @ X1 @ X9 @ X10 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X85: $i > $i > $o,X86: $i,X87: $i] :
( ( X85 @ X86 @ X87 )
=> ! [X79: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X80: $i,X81: $i,X82: $i] :
( ( ( X79 @ X80 @ X81 )
& ( X79 @ X81 @ X82 ) )
=> ( X79 @ X80 @ X82 ) )
& ! [X83: $i,X84: $i] :
( ( X85 @ X83 @ X84 )
=> ( X79 @ X83 @ X84 ) ) )
=> ( X79 @ X86 @ X87 ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X92: $i,X93: $i,X94: $i,X95: $i,X96: $i] :
( ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
& ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ X92 @ X93 )
| ~ ( epred2_0 @ X93 @ X94 )
| ( epred2_0 @ X92 @ X94 ) )
& ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X95 @ X96 )
| ( epred2_0 @ X95 @ X96 ) )
& ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( epred2_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SEU467^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.18 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:42:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.18 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mdEBNUmknp/E---3.1_4009193.p
% 0.27/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.27/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHHN.
% 0.27/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting pre_casc_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho11 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % pre_casc_5 with pid 4009222 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Result found by pre_casc_5
% 0.27/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHHN.
% 0.27/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting pre_casc_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.27/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.27/0.26 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SHHSMFNN
% 0.27/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4009226 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHHN.
% 0.27/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting pre_casc_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.27/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.27/0.26 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SHHSMFNN
% 0.27/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.27/0.26
% 0.27/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 59
% 0.27/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 45
% 0.27/0.26 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.27/0.26 % Processed clauses : 3
% 0.27/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.27/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.27/0.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.27/0.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.27/0.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.27/0.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1748
% 0.27/0.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 637
% 0.27/0.26
% 0.27/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.26 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.27/0.26 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/0.26 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 3940 pages
% 0.27/0.26
% 0.27/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.26 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/0.26 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/0.26 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.27/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------