%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU482^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:24:04 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 32.76s 8.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 32.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 27
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 72 ( 42 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 210 ( 146 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 949 ( 107 ~; 133 |; 37 &; 631 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 41 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 27 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 141 ( 141 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 17 ( 15 usr; 3 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 399 ( 142 ^; 236 !; 21 ?; 399 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
subrel: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_30,type,
rc: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_35,type,
trans: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_36,type,
tc: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_37,type,
trc: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_42,type,
term: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_44,type,
innf: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_45,type,
nfof: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_46,type,
norm: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_52,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_53,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_54,type,
esk3_1: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_55,type,
epred1_2: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_56,type,
esk4_2: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_57,type,
esk5_2: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(transitive_closure,axiom,
( tc
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
! [X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( trans @ X2 )
& ( subrel @ X1 @ X2 ) )
=> ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',transitive_closure) ).
thf(subrel,axiom,
( subrel
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
=> ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',subrel) ).
thf(transitive,axiom,
( trans
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
& ( X1 @ X4 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',transitive) ).
thf(transitive_reflexive_closure,axiom,
( trc
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o] : ( rc @ ( tc @ X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',transitive_reflexive_closure) ).
thf(reflexive_closure,axiom,
( rc
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X3 = X4 )
| ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',reflexive_closure) ).
thf(normal_form_of,axiom,
( nfof
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( trc @ X1 @ X4 @ X3 )
& ( innf @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',normal_form_of) ).
thf(in_normal_form,axiom,
( innf
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
~ ? [X4: $i] : ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',in_normal_form) ).
thf(normalizing,axiom,
( norm
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i] : ( nfof @ X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',normalizing) ).
thf(normalizing_does_not_imply_terminating,conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( norm @ X1 )
=> ( term @ X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',normalizing_does_not_imply_terminating) ).
thf(terminating,axiom,
( term
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X7: $i > $o] :
( ? [X3: $i] : ( X7 @ X3 )
=> ? [X3: $i] :
( ( X7 @ X3 )
& ! [X4: $i] :
( ( X7 @ X4 )
=> ~ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',terminating) ).
thf(two_individuals,hypothesis,
? [X4: $i,X6: $i] : ( X4 != X6 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p',two_individuals) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( tc
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
! [X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X18: $i,X19: $i,X20: $i] :
( ( ( X2 @ X18 @ X19 )
& ( X2 @ X19 @ X20 ) )
=> ( X2 @ X18 @ X20 ) )
& ! [X21: $i,X22: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X21 @ X22 )
=> ( X2 @ X21 @ X22 ) ) )
=> ( X2 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitive_closure]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( subrel
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X3 @ X4 )
=> ( Z1 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subrel]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( trans
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( ( Z0 @ X3 @ X4 )
& ( Z0 @ X4 @ X6 ) )
=> ( Z0 @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitive]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
( trc
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z1 = Z2 )
| ! [X23: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X24: $i,X25: $i,X26: $i] :
( ( ( X23 @ X24 @ X25 )
& ( X23 @ X25 @ X26 ) )
=> ( X23 @ X24 @ X26 ) )
& ! [X27: $i,X28: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X27 @ X28 )
=> ( X23 @ X27 @ X28 ) ) )
=> ( X23 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitive_reflexive_closure]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( rc
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z1 = Z2 )
| ( Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexive_closure]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( tc
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
! [X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X18: $i,X19: $i,X20: $i] :
( ( ( X2 @ X18 @ X19 )
& ( X2 @ X19 @ X20 ) )
=> ( X2 @ X18 @ X20 ) )
& ! [X21: $i,X22: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X21 @ X22 )
=> ( X2 @ X21 @ X22 ) ) )
=> ( X2 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( nfof
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z2
| ! [X52: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X53: $i,X54: $i,X55: $i] :
( ( ( X52 @ X53 @ X54 )
& ( X52 @ X54 @ X55 ) )
=> ( X52 @ X53 @ X55 ) )
& ! [X56: $i,X57: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X56 @ X57 )
=> ( X52 @ X56 @ X57 ) ) )
=> ( X52 @ Z2 @ Z1 ) ) )
& ~ ? [X58: $i] : ( Z0 @ Z1 @ X58 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[normal_form_of]) ).
thf(c_0_18,plain,
( trc
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z1 = Z2 )
| ! [X23: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X24: $i,X25: $i,X26: $i] :
( ( ( X23 @ X24 @ X25 )
& ( X23 @ X25 @ X26 ) )
=> ( X23 @ X24 @ X26 ) )
& ! [X27: $i,X28: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X27 @ X28 )
=> ( X23 @ X27 @ X28 ) ) )
=> ( X23 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
( innf
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ? [X4: $i] : ( Z0 @ Z1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[in_normal_form]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
( norm
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
( ( ( X3 = X4 )
| ! [X59: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X60: $i,X61: $i,X62: $i] :
( ( ( X59 @ X60 @ X61 )
& ( X59 @ X61 @ X62 ) )
=> ( X59 @ X60 @ X62 ) )
& ! [X63: $i,X64: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X63 @ X64 )
=> ( X59 @ X63 @ X64 ) ) )
=> ( X59 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
& ~ ? [X65: $i] : ( Z0 @ X4 @ X65 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[normalizing]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
( nfof
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z2
| ! [X52: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X53: $i,X54: $i,X55: $i] :
( ( ( X52 @ X53 @ X54 )
& ( X52 @ X54 @ X55 ) )
=> ( X52 @ X53 @ X55 ) )
& ! [X56: $i,X57: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X56 @ X57 )
=> ( X52 @ X56 @ X57 ) ) )
=> ( X52 @ Z2 @ Z1 ) ) )
& ~ ? [X58: $i] : ( Z0 @ Z1 @ X58 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( norm @ X1 )
=> ( term @ X1 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[normalizing_does_not_imply_terminating]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
( term
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X7: $i > $o] :
( ? [X3: $i] : ( X7 @ X3 )
=> ? [X3: $i] :
( ( X7 @ X3 )
& ! [X4: $i] :
( ( X7 @ X4 )
=> ~ ( Z0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[terminating]) ).
thf(c_0_24,plain,
( norm
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
( ( ( X3 = X4 )
| ! [X59: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X60: $i,X61: $i,X62: $i] :
( ( ( X59 @ X60 @ X61 )
& ( X59 @ X61 @ X62 ) )
=> ( X59 @ X60 @ X62 ) )
& ! [X63: $i,X64: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ X63 @ X64 )
=> ( X59 @ X63 @ X64 ) ) )
=> ( X59 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
& ~ ? [X65: $i] : ( Z0 @ X4 @ X65 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ! [X160: $i] :
? [X161: $i] :
( ( ( X160 = X161 )
| ! [X162: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ! [X163: $i,X164: $i,X165: $i] :
( ( ( X162 @ X163 @ X164 )
& ( X162 @ X164 @ X165 ) )
=> ( X162 @ X163 @ X165 ) )
& ! [X166: $i,X167: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X166 @ X167 )
=> ( X162 @ X166 @ X167 ) ) )
=> ( X162 @ X160 @ X161 ) ) )
& ~ ? [X168: $i] : ( X1 @ X161 @ X168 ) )
=> ! [X169: $i > $o] :
( ? [X170: $i] : ( X169 @ X170 )
=> ? [X171: $i] :
( ( X169 @ X171 )
& ! [X172: $i] :
( ( X169 @ X172 )
=> ~ ( X1 @ X171 @ X172 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
! [X175: $i > $i > $o,X177: $i,X179: $i,X180: $i,X181: $i,X182: $i,X183: $i,X185: $i > $o,X186: $i,X188: $i] :
( ( ( X185 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ( ( esk3_1 @ X175 )
!= X177 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( X185 @ X188 )
| ~ ( X175 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) @ X188 )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ( ( esk3_1 @ X175 )
!= X177 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) )
& ( ( X185 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X179 @ X180 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X180 @ X181 )
| ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X179 @ X181 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( X185 @ X188 )
| ~ ( X175 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) @ X188 )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X179 @ X180 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X180 @ X181 )
| ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X179 @ X181 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) )
& ( ( X185 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ~ ( X175 @ X182 @ X183 )
| ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X182 @ X183 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( X185 @ X188 )
| ~ ( X175 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) @ X188 )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ~ ( X175 @ X182 @ X183 )
| ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ X182 @ X183 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) )
& ( ( X185 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ ( esk3_1 @ X175 ) @ X177 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( X185 @ X188 )
| ~ ( X175 @ ( esk5_2 @ X175 @ X185 ) @ X188 )
| ~ ( X185 @ X186 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X175 @ X177 @ ( esk3_1 @ X175 ) @ X177 )
| ( X175 @ X177 @ ( esk4_2 @ X175 @ X177 ) ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i,X9: $i,X7: $i > $o,X6: $i] :
( ( X7 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) )
| ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X9 @ X4 @ X6 )
| ( X1 @ X9 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X9 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ X4 @ X6 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X6: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X4 @ X6 @ X9 )
| ( X1 @ X4 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ X6 @ X9 ) ),
inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_27]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X7: $i > $o,X4: $i] :
( ( X7 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) )
| ( X1 @ X4 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 )
| ( ( esk3_1 @ X1 )
!= X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X7: $i > $o,X4: $i] :
( ( X7 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) )
| ( X1 @ X4 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X3: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i > $o,X10: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X10 @ X6 @ X9 )
| ( X1 @ X10 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X10 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X4 )
| ~ ( X1 @ X6 @ X9 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( X6 = X3 )
| ( epred1_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ X3
@ X6
@ X9 ) ),
inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_28]) ).
thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) )
| ( X7 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X1 @ X4 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ X4 ) ),
inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_30]) ).
thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( X3 = X4 )
| ( epred1_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X4 )
@ X4
@ X3
@ X6 ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X3: $i,X7: $i > $o,X6: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X6 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X6 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X4 )
| ( ( esk3_1 @ X1 )
!= X6 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_33]) ).
thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 ) )
= X3 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35])])]) ).
thf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
? [X4: $i,X6: $i] : ( X4 != X6 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[two_individuals]) ).
thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X4: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X4 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X7: $i > $o,X4: $i] :
( ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X7
@ ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ X7 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X4 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_35])])]) ).
thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X3: $i,X7: $i > $o,X6: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X6 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X6 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X4 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X6 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ X6 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])])]) ).
thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X3 = X4 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X4 ) )
!= X4 ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 )
@ ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X4 )
@ ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_37]) ).
thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X7: $i > $o,X6: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ X7 )
= X3 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X4 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X6 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_35])])]) ).
thf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).
thf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X6: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X4 = X6 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 )
@ ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X6 )
@ ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) )
= X3 )
| ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ X6 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_37]) ).
thf(c_0_51,hypothesis,
! [X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 )
@ ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != esk2_0 )
@ ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49])]) ).
thf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 != X3 )
@ ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) )
= X3 )
| ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_37])]),c_0_45]) ).
thf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X6: $i,X9: $i,X10: $i,X12: $i] :
( ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X6 @ X9 @ X12 )
| ( X1 @ X6 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X6 ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( esk5_2 @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X4 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X6 @ X9 @ X10 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X6 @ X10 @ X12 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_54,hypothesis,
! [X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52])]) ).
thf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( X6 = X3 )
| ( epred1_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ X6
@ X3
@ X9 ) ),
inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_28]) ).
thf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ ( esk5_2 @ X2 @ ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) ) )
| ( X2 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) @ ( esk4_2 @ X2 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_37]) ).
thf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X4 = X6 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ X6 ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_52])]) ).
thf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i,X9: $i,X10: $i] :
( ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ esk2_0 )
| ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6 )
| ( X1 @ X3 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X3 @ X9 @ X6 )
| ~ ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X9 )
| ~ ( X1 @ X10 @ X10 ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( X3 = X4 )
| ( epred1_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 )
@ X3
@ X4
@ X6 ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_55])])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X1 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ X4 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_52])])]),c_0_57]) ).
thf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
! [X9: $i,X6: $i,X4: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X4 = X3 )
| ( epred1_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ X4
@ X6
@ X9 )
| ~ ( epred1_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ X4
@ X6
@ X3 ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2 @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( epred1_2 @ X1 @ X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) @ X6 )
| ( X1 @ X4 @ ( esk4_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_60])]) ).
thf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( X6 = X3 )
| ( epred1_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ X6
@ ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
@ X9 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62])])]) ).
thf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i > $o,X9: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 )
| ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ X7 )
!= X3 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X6 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X9 ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_63])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_60])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( esk3_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_65])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
! [X6: $i,X4: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 ) )
= X4 )
| ( X6 = X3 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_66])]),c_0_59]) ).
thf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i > $o,X9: $i] :
( ( X3 = X4 )
| ( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X4 )
@ X7 )
!= X4 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X6 )
| ~ ( X7 @ X9 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_66])]),c_0_59]) ).
thf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( esk5_2
@ ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = X3 ) )
= X3 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_67])]) ).
thf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] : ( X3 = X4 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_71,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_70]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU482^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:46:47 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.18 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.23 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eNhnb0UYB5/E---3.1_3547534.p
% 0.19/0.26 % Type mismatch for $false @ Z-2 @ Z-1 and type $o
% 0.19/0.26 eprover: Type error
% 0.19/0.26 % Type mismatch for $false @ Z-2 @ Z-1 and type $o
% 0.19/0.26 eprover: Type error
% 32.76/8.44 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 32.76/8.44 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 32.76/8.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting post_as_ho11 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % full_lambda_8 with pid 3547550 completed with status 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Result found by full_lambda_8
% 32.76/8.44 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 32.76/8.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting post_as_ho11 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 32.76/8.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 32.76/8.44 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF21-SHSSMMBN
% 32.76/8.44 % partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF22-SHSSMMBN
% 32.76/8.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3547556 completed with status 10
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 31s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % full_lambda_8 with pid 3547563 completed with status 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Result found by full_lambda_8
% 32.76/8.44 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 32.76/8.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting post_as_ho11 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 32.76/8.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 32.76/8.44 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF21-SHSSMMBN
% 32.76/8.44 % partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF22-SHSSMMBN
% 32.76/8.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3547556 completed with status 10
% 32.76/8.44 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 31s (1) cores
% 32.76/8.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 32.76/8.44 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 32.76/8.44
% 32.76/8.44 % Proof found!
% 32.76/8.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 32.76/8.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 32.76/8.44 % Parsed axioms : 60
% 32.76/8.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Initial clauses : 38
% 32.76/8.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 29
% 32.76/8.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 32.76/8.44 % Processed clauses : 1813
% 32.76/8.44 % ...of these trivial : 18
% 32.76/8.44 % ...subsumed : 1193
% 32.76/8.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 602
% 32.76/8.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3005
% 32.76/8.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Backward-subsumed : 295
% 32.76/8.44 % Backward-rewritten : 276
% 32.76/8.44 % Generated clauses : 54792
% 32.76/8.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 48520
% 32.76/8.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 35
% 32.76/8.44 % Paramodulations : 51572
% 32.76/8.44 % Factorizations : 192
% 32.76/8.44 % NegExts : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Equation resolutions : 3005
% 32.76/8.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Total rewrite steps : 4832
% 32.76/8.44 % ...of those cached : 4355
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 32.76/8.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 32.76/8.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 32.76/8.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 32.76/8.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 32.76/8.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 32.76/8.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 32.76/8.44 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 32.76/8.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40731
% 32.76/8.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 231157
% 32.76/8.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 581
% 32.76/8.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35014
% 32.76/8.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10663
% 32.76/8.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1830
% 32.76/8.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 565
% 32.76/8.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 32.76/8.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1043
% 32.76/8.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 295
% 32.76/8.44 % Condensation attempts : 1813
% 32.76/8.44 % Condensation successes : 330
% 32.76/8.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 6836750
% 32.76/8.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 912
% 32.76/8.44
% 32.76/8.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 32.76/8.44 % User time : 8.111 s
% 32.76/8.44 % System time : 0.049 s
% 32.76/8.44 % Total time : 8.161 s
% 32.76/8.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3944 pages
% 32.76/8.44
% 32.76/8.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 32.76/8.44 % User time : 8.114 s
% 32.76/8.44 % System time : 0.055 s
% 32.76/8.44 % Total time : 8.168 s
% 32.76/8.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 32.76/8.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------