↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU498^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:28:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.89s 2.03s
% Output   : Refutation 3.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  11   ~;   0   |;  18   &;  51   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  18   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (  10   ^;  22   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(refl_decl,type,
    refl: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(antisymm_decl,type,
    antisymm: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(asymm_decl,type,
    asymm: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(trans_decl,type,
    trans: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(po_decl,type,
    po: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(so_decl,type,
    so: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(refl_def,definition,
    ( refl
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] : ( A @ B @ B ) ) ) ).

thf(antisymm_def,definition,
    ( antisymm
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
            & ( A @ C @ B ) )
         => ( B = C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(asymm_def,definition,
    ( asymm
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ B @ C )
         => ~ ( A @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(trans_def,definition,
    ( trans
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
            & ( A @ C @ D ) )
         => ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ).

thf(po_def,definition,
    ( po
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ( refl @ A )
          & ( antisymm @ A )
          & ( trans @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(so_def,definition,
    ( so
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ( asymm @ A )
          & ( trans @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( po @ A )
     => ( so
        @ ^ [B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ B @ C )
            & ( B != C ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',partial_order_induces_strict_order) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( po @ A )
       => ( so
          @ ^ [B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ B @ C )
              & ( B != C ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ! [B: $i] : ( A @ B @ B )
          & ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( A @ C @ B ) )
             => ( B = C ) )
          & ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( A @ C @ D ) )
             => ( A @ B @ D ) ) )
       => ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( B != C ) )
             => ~ ( ( A @ C @ B )
                  & ( C != B ) ) )
          & ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( B != C )
                & ( A @ C @ D )
                & ( C != D ) )
             => ( ( A @ B @ D )
                & ( B != D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU498^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:46:32 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.70/0.57  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.47/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (236ms). 
% 1.47/0.82  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.08/1.21  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.08/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.26/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.50/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.50/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.50/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.50/1.43  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.53/2.03  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.89/2.03  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.89/2.03  % Time passed: 1722ms (effective reasoning time: 1205ms)
% 3.89/2.03  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.89/2.03  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.89/2.03  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 3.89/2.03  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1722 ms resp. 1205 ms w/o parsing
% 3.89/2.08  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.89/2.08  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------