↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU505^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:32:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.24s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  330 ( 110 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  353 (  24   ~;  34   |;  12   &; 236   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  29  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  15 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  16  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (  20   ^;  56   !;   6   ?;  82   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    setextAx: $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vIFF: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( setextAx
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            <=> ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setextAx) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( setextAx
   => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
       => ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             => ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) )
         => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setext) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setextAx
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         => ( ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
               => ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) )
           => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( setextAx
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            <=> ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( setextAx
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                    = ( in @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
             => ( Y1 = Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ( setextAx
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         => ( ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
               => ( in @ X3 @ X0 ) )
           => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( ( setextAx = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                = $true ) )
         => ( ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
                  = $true )
               => ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                  = $true ) )
           => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
             != $true ) )
        & ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ( setextAx = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
             != $true ) )
        & ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ( setextAx = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             != $true ) )
        & ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ( setextAx = $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != sK1 )
    & ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ X2 @ sK0 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( in @ X2 @ sK1 ) ) )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( in @ X3 @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( setextAx = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( setextAx
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                    = ( in @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
             => ( Y1 = Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    setextAx = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( in @ X3 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X2 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ X2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                    = ( in @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
             => ( Y1 = Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f12,f13]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                      = ( in @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
               => ( Y1 = Y0 ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                  = ( in @ Y1 @ X1 ) ) )
           => ( Y0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                  = ( in @ Y1 @ X1 ) ) )
           => ( Y0 = X1 ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y0 @ X2 )
              = ( in @ Y0 @ X1 ) ) )
       => ( X2 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y0 @ X2 )
              = ( in @ Y0 @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X2 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y0 @ X2 )
              = ( in @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
          @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X2 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y0 @ X2 )
              = ( in @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
          @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
          = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
       != ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ sK0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) )
      | ( sK1 = X0 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f15,f29]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ sK0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) )
      | ( sK1 = X0 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true = $false )
      | ( $true
       != ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ sK0 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) )
      | ( sK1 = X0 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f14,f30]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ sK0 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) )
      | ( sK1 = X0 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f71]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) @ sK0 ) )
    | ( sK0 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(equality_factoring,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) @ sK0 ) )
    | ( sK0 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f93,f16]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ( sK0 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f77,f99]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    sK0 = sK1,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f118]) ).

thf(f134,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f126,f16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU505^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.17  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:49:43 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.24  % (616155)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1092423506:i=116_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/116Mi)
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-616155-616168"...
% 0.08/0.24  % (616165)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.08/0.24  % (616168)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.08/0.24  % (616155)Success in time 0.019 s
% 0.08/0.24  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------