↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU506^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:32:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.25s
% Output   : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU506^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:52:05 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.25  % (378381)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.09/0.25  % (378395)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=4264260504:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.09/0.25  % (378395) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-378381-378395"...
% 0.09/0.25  % (378391)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.09/0.25  % (378395)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.25  % (378395)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.09/0.25  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.25  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.25  thf(type_def_5, type, sTfun: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_0, type, in: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_2, type, emptysetE: $o).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_4, type, setext: $o).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_5, type, vPI: !>[X0: $tType]:(((X0 > $o) > $o))).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_6, type, vIMP: ($o > $o > $o)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_7, type, db0: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_8, type, vLAM: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1) > (X0 > X1))).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_9, type, db1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_10, type, db2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_11, type, vEQ: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > X0 > $o))).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_15, type, vNOT: ($o > $o)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_16, type, sK1: ($i > $i > $i)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(func_def_17, type, sK2: ($i > $i > $i)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.09/0.25    (emptysetE = ! [X0 : $i] : ((in @ X0 @ emptyset) => ! [X1 : $o] : X1))),
% 0.09/0.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',emptysetE)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 0.09/0.25    (setext = ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (in @ X2 @ X1)) => (! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X1) => (in @ X2 @ X0)) => (X0 = X1))))),
% 0.09/0.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setext)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f3,conjecture,(
% 0.09/0.25    emptysetE => (setext => ! [X0 : $i] : (! [X1 : $i] : ~(in @ X1 @ X0) => (X0 = emptyset)))),
% 0.09/0.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',emptyI)).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.09/0.25    ~(emptysetE => (setext => ! [X0 : $i] : (! [X1 : $i] : ~(in @ X1 @ X0) => (X0 = emptyset))))),
% 0.09/0.25    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3])).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.09/0.25    (emptysetE = ! [X0 : $i] : ((in @ X0 @ emptyset) => ! [X1 : $o] : X1))),
% 0.09/0.25    inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.09/0.25    (emptysetE = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ emptyset) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y1 : $o]: (Y1))))))))),
% 0.09/0.25    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.09/0.25    (setext = ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (in @ X2 @ X1)) => (! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X1) => (in @ X3 @ X0)) => (X0 = X1))))),
% 0.09/0.25    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.09/0.25    (setext = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y1) => (in @ Y2 @ Y0)))) => ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y0) => (in @ Y2 @ Y1)))) => (Y1 = Y0)))))))))),
% 0.09/0.25    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.09/0.25    ~(emptysetE => (setext => ! [X0 : $i] : (! [X1 : $i] : ~(in @ X1 @ X0) => (X0 = emptyset))))),
% 0.09/0.25    inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.09/0.25    ~((emptysetE = $true) => ((setext = $true) => ! [X0 : $i] : (! [X1 : $i] : ~ (((in @ X1 @ X0)) = $true) => (emptyset = X0))))),
% 0.09/0.25    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9])).
% 0.09/0.25  thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.09/0.25    ~((emptysetE = $true) => ((setext = $true) => ! [X0 : $i] : (! [X1 : $i] : (((in @ X1 @ X0)) != $true) => (emptyset = X0))))),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(flattening,[],[f10])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (? [X0 : $i] : ((emptyset != X0) & ! [X1 : $i] : (((in @ X1 @ X0)) != $true)) & (setext = $true)) & (emptysetE = $true)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ? [X0 : $i] : ((emptyset != X0) & ! [X1 : $i] : (((in @ X1 @ X0)) != $true)) & (setext = $true) & (emptysetE = $true)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(flattening,[],[f12])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ((emptyset != sK0) & ! [X1 : $i] : ($true != ((in @ X1 @ sK0)))) & (setext = $true) & (emptysetE = $true)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f13])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (emptysetE = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ emptyset) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y1 : $o]: (Y1))))))))),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (setext = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y1) => (in @ Y2 @ Y0)))) => ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y0) => (in @ Y2 @ Y1)))) => (Y1 = Y0)))))))))),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (emptysetE = $true)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (setext = $true)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true != ((in @ X1 @ sK0)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (emptyset != sK0)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f22,definition,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X0 : $o] : (($true = X0) | ($false = X0)) )),
% 0.09/0.26    introduced(theory,[fool_exhaustiveness_axiom])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ emptyset) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y1 : $o]: (Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f15,f17])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y1) => (in @ Y2 @ Y0)))) => ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y0) => (in @ Y2 @ Y1)))) => (Y1 = Y0)))))))) = $true)),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f16,f18])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f25,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = (((^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y1) => (in @ Y2 @ Y0)))) => ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y2 @ Y0) => (in @ Y2 @ Y1)))) => (Y1 = Y0)))))) @ X1)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f24])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f26,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ Y0) => (in @ Y1 @ X1)))) => ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ X1) => (in @ Y1 @ Y0)))) => (Y0 = X1)))))))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f25])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f27,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ Y0) => (in @ Y1 @ X1)))) => ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ X1) => (in @ Y1 @ Y0)))) => (Y0 = X1)))) @ X2)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f26])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f28,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X2) => (in @ Y0 @ X1)))) => ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => (in @ Y0 @ X2)))) => (X2 = X1)))))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f27])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f29,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X2) => (in @ Y0 @ X1)))))) | ($true = (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => (in @ Y0 @ X2)))) => (X2 = X1))))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f28])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f30,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X2) => (in @ Y0 @ X1))) @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2)))) | ($true = (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => (in @ Y0 @ X2)))) => (X2 = X1))))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f29])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f31,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X2) => (in @ Y0 @ X1))) @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2)))) | ($false = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => (in @ Y0 @ X2)))))) | ($true = ((X2 = X1)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f30])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f32,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X2) => (in @ Y0 @ X1))) @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2)))) | ($false = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => (in @ Y0 @ X2))) @ (sK2 @ X1 @ X2)))) | ($true = ((X2 = X1)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f31])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f33,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X2) => (in @ Y0 @ X1))) @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2)))) | ($false = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => (in @ Y0 @ X2))) @ (sK2 @ X1 @ X2)))) | (X1 = X2)) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f32])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f34,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (((in @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2) @ X2) => (in @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2) @ X1)))) | ($false = (((in @ (sK2 @ X1 @ X2) @ X1) => (in @ (sK2 @ X1 @ X2) @ X2)))) | (X1 = X2)) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f33])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f36,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = ((in @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2) @ X2))) | ($false = (((in @ (sK2 @ X1 @ X2) @ X1) => (in @ (sK2 @ X1 @ X2) @ X2)))) | (X1 = X2)) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f34])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f38,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = ((in @ (sK2 @ X1 @ X2) @ X1))) | ($true = ((in @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X2) @ X2))) | (X1 = X2)) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f36])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f41,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ emptyset) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y1 : $o]: (Y1))))) @ X1)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f23])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f42,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = (((in @ X1 @ emptyset) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y0 : $o]: (Y0))))))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f41])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f43,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = ((in @ X1 @ emptyset))) | (((!! @ $o @ (^[Y0 : $o]: (Y0)))) = $true)) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f42])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f44,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $o,X1 : $i] : (($false = ((in @ X1 @ emptyset))) | ($true = (((^[Y0 : $o]: (Y0)) @ X2)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f43])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f45,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $o,X1 : $i] : (($false = ((in @ X1 @ emptyset))) | ($true = X2)) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f44])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f47,definition,(
% 0.09/0.26    spl3_1 <=> ! [X2 : $o] : ($true = X2)),
% 0.09/0.26    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f48,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X2 : $o] : (($true = X2)) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f47])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f50,definition,(
% 0.09/0.26    spl3_2 <=> ! [X1 : $i] : ($false = ((in @ X1 @ emptyset)))),
% 0.09/0.26    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f51,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = ((in @ X1 @ emptyset)))) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f50])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f52,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    spl3_1 | spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f45,f50,f47])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f56,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ($false = ((in @ X0 @ sK0)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f19,f22])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f62,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false = ((in @ X0 @ sK0)))) )),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f56])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f74,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = $false) | ($true = ((in @ (sK1 @ emptyset @ X0) @ X0))) | (emptyset = X0)) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f51,f38])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f75,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = ((in @ (sK1 @ emptyset @ X0) @ X0))) | (emptyset = X0)) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f74])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f80,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ($true = $false) | (emptyset = sK0) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f75,f62])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f85,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    (emptyset = sK0) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f80])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f90,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    $false | ~spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f85,f20])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f91,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ~spl3_2),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f90])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f96,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ($true = $false) | ~spl3_1),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f62,f48])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f102,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    $false | ~spl3_1),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f96])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f103,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    ~spl3_1),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f102])).
% 0.09/0.26  cnf(s1, plain, spl3_1 | spl3_2, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f52])).
% 0.09/0.26  cnf(s4, plain, ~spl3_2, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f91])).
% 0.09/0.26  cnf(s6, plain, ~spl3_1, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f103])).
% 0.09/0.26  cnf(s7, plain, $false, inference(rat,[],[s1,s4,s6])).
% 0.09/0.26  thf(f112,plain,(
% 0.09/0.26    $false),
% 0.09/0.26    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s7])).
% 0.09/0.26  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.09/0.26  % (378395)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.09/0.26  % (378381)Success in time 0.031 s
% 0.09/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------