↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU509^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:28:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.27s 2.47s
% Output   : Refutation 4.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   84 (  25 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  209 (  28   ~;  19   |;   6   &; 126   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  30  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   5   ^;  43   !;   6   ?;  57   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(emptyset_decl,type,
    emptyset: $i ).

thf(emptysetE_decl,type,
    emptysetE: $o ).

thf(setext_decl,type,
    setext: $o ).

thf(nonempty_decl,type,
    nonempty: $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(emptysetE_def,definition,
    ( emptysetE
    = ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( in @ A @ emptyset )
         => ! [B: $o] : B ) ) ) ).

thf(setext_def,definition,
    ( setext
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ A )
             => ( in @ C @ B ) )
         => ( ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ B )
               => ( in @ C @ A ) )
           => ( A = B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(nonempty_def,definition,
    ( nonempty
    = ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A != emptyset ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
        @+[C: $i] :
          ~ ( ( in @ C @ B )
           => ( in @ C @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
        @+[C: $i] :
          ~ ( ( in @ C @ A )
           => ( in @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( A != emptyset )
           => ? [B: $i] : ( in @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( emptysetE
   => ( setext
     => ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( nonempty @ A )
         => ? [B: $i] : ( in @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nonemptyE1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( emptysetE
     => ( setext
       => ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( nonempty @ A )
           => ? [B: $i] : ( in @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( in @ A @ emptyset )
         => ! [B: $o] : B )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ A )
               => ( in @ C @ B ) )
           => ( ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ C @ B )
                 => ( in @ C @ A ) )
             => ( A = B ) ) )
       => ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A != emptyset )
           => ? [B: $i] : ( in @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( ( ? [A: $i] : ( in @ A @ emptyset )
       => ! [A: $o] : A )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ A )
               => ( in @ C @ B ) )
           => ( ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ C @ B )
                 => ( in @ C @ A ) )
             => ( A = B ) ) )
       => ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A != emptyset )
           => ? [B: $i] : ( in @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
        | B )
      & ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ D @ C ) @ C )
        | ( in @ ( sk2 @ D @ C ) @ D )
        | ( C = D ) )
      & ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ D @ C ) @ C )
        | ~ ( in @ ( sk2 @ D @ C ) @ C )
        | ( C = D ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ D @ C ) @ D )
        | ( in @ ( sk2 @ D @ C ) @ D )
        | ( C = D ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ D @ C ) @ D )
        | ~ ( in @ ( sk2 @ D @ C ) @ C )
        | ( C = D ) )
      & ( sk3 != emptyset )
      & ~ ( in @ E @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
      | B ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( in @ A @ sk3 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( in @ A @ sk3 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
      | ~ $true
      | ( B
       != ( in @ C @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,22]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
      | ( B
       != ( in @ C @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[24:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( in @ D @ sk3 )),bind(C,$thf( D ))]]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ A )
      | ( in @ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) @ B )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ A )
      | ( in @ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) @ B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ A )
      | ( in @ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    sk3 != emptyset,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    sk3 != emptyset,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(123,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,14,21,22,3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU509^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.08/0.22  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:45:10 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.99/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (170ms). 
% 1.17/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.74/1.39  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.74/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.08/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.08/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.08/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.08/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.08/1.55  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.27/2.46  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.27/2.47  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.27/2.47  % Time passed: 2097ms (effective reasoning time: 1474ms)
% 4.27/2.47  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.27/2.47  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.27/2.47  % No. of inferences in proof: 17
% 4.27/2.47  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2097 ms resp. 1474 ms w/o parsing
% 4.58/2.52  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.58/2.52  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------