↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU513^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:01:47 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.43s 3.60s
% Output   : Proof 3.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SEU513^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 05:18:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.43/3.60  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.43/3.60  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq setadjoinIL (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xx Xy))) True
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (setadjoinIL → in emptyset (setadjoin emptyset emptyset))) True
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (setadjoinIL → in emptyset (setadjoin emptyset emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Eq setadjoinIL True
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (in emptyset (setadjoin emptyset emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #5 (by clausification #[0]): Eq setadjoinIL (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xx Xy))
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #6 (by forward demodulation #[5, 3]): Eq True (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xx Xy))
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), in a (setadjoin a Xy)) True
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (in a (setadjoin a a_1)) True
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #9 (by superposition #[8, 4]): Eq True False
% 3.43/3.60  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): False
% 3.43/3.60  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------