↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU513^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.24s
% Output   : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  144 (  29 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  128 (  21   ~;  15   |;   4   &;  80   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  10 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  18   !;   4   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    setadjoinIL: $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( setadjoinIL
    = ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] : ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setadjoinIL) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( setadjoinIL
   => ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',emptyinunitempty) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setadjoinIL
     => ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( setadjoinIL
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( $true
        = ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ( setadjoinIL
     => ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
     => ( ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) )
     != $true )
    & ( setadjoinIL = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
      | ? [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( $true
         != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         != $true ) )
    & ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ X3 ) )
          = $true )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
      | ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( setadjoin @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
       != $true ) )
    & ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ X3 ) )
          = $true )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    setadjoinIL = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ X3 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f18,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ emptyset @ ( setadjoin @ emptyset @ emptyset ) )
     != $true )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ~ spl2_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f18]) ).

thf(f23,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ( setadjoinIL = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f32,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ X3 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ X3 ) )
        = $true )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f32,f23]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f23]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f20,f33]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f37]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ~ spl2_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f21]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f34]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f38]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    spl2_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s4]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s6]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s7]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU513^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.16  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.16  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.16  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.16  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.16  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.16  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.16  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:46:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.16  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.16  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.20  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138764)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=2695181161:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2138764-2138772"...
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.09/0.24  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.24  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138772)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.09/0.24  % (2138764)Success in time 0.032 s
% 0.09/0.24  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------