%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU514^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:24:20 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.08s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 92 ( 8 ~; 7 |; 4 &; 64 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 ^; 21 !; 0 ?; 21 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
setadjoinAx: $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_27,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(setadjoinIR,conjecture,
( setadjoinAx
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sMkmL6q6L2/E---3.1_94495.p',setadjoinIR) ).
thf(setadjoinAx,axiom,
( setadjoinAx
<=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X2 ) )
<=> ( ( X3 = X1 )
| ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sMkmL6q6L2/E---3.1_94495.p',setadjoinAx) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( setadjoinAx
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[setadjoinIR]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X10: $i,X11: $i,X12: $i] :
( ( in @ X12 @ ( setadjoin @ X10 @ X11 ) )
<=> ( ( X12 = X10 )
| ( in @ X12 @ X11 ) ) )
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,setadjoinAx]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X13: $i,X14: $i,X15: $i] :
( ( ~ ( in @ X15 @ ( setadjoin @ X13 @ X14 ) )
| ( X15 = X13 )
| ( in @ X15 @ X14 ) )
& ( ( X15 != X13 )
| ( in @ X15 @ ( setadjoin @ X13 @ X14 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( in @ X15 @ X14 )
| ( in @ X15 @ ( setadjoin @ X13 @ X14 ) ) )
& ( in @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 )
& ~ ( in @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( in @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X3: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ X2 ) )
| ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
in @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU514^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:49:41 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sMkmL6q6L2/E---3.1_94495.p
% 0.08/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % sh5l with pid 94527 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.08/0.26 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.08/0.26 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFMFNN
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % SubtermCWHack with pid 94531 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.08/0.26 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.08/0.26 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFMFNN
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.26
% 0.08/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.08/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.08/0.26 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.08/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.08/0.26 % Processed clauses : 5
% 0.08/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.08/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.08/0.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.08/0.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 422
% 0.08/0.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 147
% 0.08/0.26
% 0.08/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.26 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.26 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.08/0.26
% 0.08/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.26 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.26 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------