↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU519^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:28:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.32s 3.04s
% Output   : Refutation 5.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  173 (  20   ~;  12   |;   3   &; 120   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   2   ^;  41   !;   1   ?;  46   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(emptyset_decl,type,
    emptyset: $i ).

thf(powerset_decl,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

thf(emptysetE_decl,type,
    emptysetE: $o ).

thf(powersetI_decl,type,
    powersetI: $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(emptysetE_def,definition,
    ( emptysetE
    = ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( in @ A @ emptyset )
         => ! [B: $o] : B ) ) ) ).

thf(powersetI_def,definition,
    ( powersetI
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ B )
             => ( in @ C @ A ) )
         => ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
        @+[C: $i] :
          ~ ( ( in @ C @ A )
           => ( in @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( emptysetE
   => ( powersetI
     => ! [A: $i] : ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',emptyinPowerset) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( emptysetE
     => ( powersetI
       => ! [A: $i] : ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( in @ A @ emptyset )
         => ! [B: $o] : B )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ B )
               => ( in @ C @ A ) )
           => ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) )
       => ! [A: $i] : ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( ( ? [A: $i] : ( in @ A @ emptyset )
       => ! [A: $o] : A )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ B )
               => ( in @ C @ A ) )
           => ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) )
       => ! [A: $i] : ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
        | B )
      & ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ D @ C ) @ D )
        | ( in @ D @ ( powerset @ C ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ D @ C ) @ C )
        | ( in @ D @ ( powerset @ C ) ) )
      & ~ ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
      | ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
      | ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
      | B ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
      | ~ $true
      | ( B
       != ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ sk2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6,9]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset )
      | ( B
       != ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ sk2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( in @ A @ emptyset ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[16:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ sk2 ) ))]]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
       != ( in @ C @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[10,17]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
      | ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
       != ( in @ C @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[37:[bind(A,$thf( E )),bind(B,$thf( emptyset )),bind(C,$thf( sk1 @ emptyset @ E ))]]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( in @ emptyset @ ( powerset @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[9,45]) ).

thf(49,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU519^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:50:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.20/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.74/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (272ms). 
% 1.74/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.85/1.91  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.85/1.92  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.14/2.07  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.14/2.12  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.14/2.13  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 3.14/2.13  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.14/2.14  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.32/3.03  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.32/3.03  % Time passed: 2623ms (effective reasoning time: 1722ms)
% 5.32/3.03  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.32/3.03  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.32/3.03  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 5.32/3.04  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2623 ms resp. 1722 ms w/o parsing
% 5.77/3.11  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.77/3.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------