↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU525^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.49s 1.28s
% Output   : Refutation 1.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  218 (  92 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  221 (  26   ~;  24   |;  22   &; 109   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  23  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   5 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   7  !!;   4  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (  30   ^;  29   !;  15   ?;  74   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sK1: $i > $i ).

thf(f59,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f56]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( sK3 != sK3 )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f54,f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
    = $true ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      & ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK3 = Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
               => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK3 )
    = $true ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
               => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f22,f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X1 = X2 ) )
          & ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X1 = X2 ) )
          & ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1qSkGFMI77/DTF2THF_22173.p',exu) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( exu
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( exu
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
    & ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
           != X1 ) )
        & ( ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
            = X1 ) ) )
    & ( exuE1 = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f14,f16,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ! [X1: $i] :
          ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
               != $true )
              | ( X1 != X2 ) )
            & ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
              | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( exu
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
      & ! [X1: $i] :
        ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
             != $true )
            | ( X1 != X2 ) )
          & ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
             != $true )
            | ( X1 != X2 ) )
          & ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( X1 = X2 ) ) )
     => ( ( ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
           != X1 ) )
        & ( ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
            = X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ! [X1: $i] :
          ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
               != $true )
              | ( X1 != X2 ) )
            & ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
              | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) )
    & ( exuE1 = $true ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ! [X1: $i] :
          ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( X1 = X2 )
          <~> ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) ) )
    & ( exuE1 = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ~ ( ( exuE1 = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( exu
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
            = $true )
         => ? [X1: $i] :
            ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X1 = X2 )
            <=> ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ~ ( ( exuE1 = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( exu
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
            = $true )
         => ? [X2: $i] :
            ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                = $true )
            <=> ( X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ~ ( exuE1
     => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( exu
            @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
         => ? [X2: $i] :
            ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            <=> ( X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( exuE1
     => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( exu
            @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
         => ? [X1: $i] :
            ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            <=> ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ( exuE1
   => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( exu
          @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
       => ? [X1: $i] :
          ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          <=> ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1qSkGFMI77/DTF2THF_22173.p',exuE2) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( sK3 != X0 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 != X0 )
      | ( sK3 != X0 )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X0 )
        = X0 )
      | ( sK3 != X0 ) ),
    inference(equality_factoring,[status(thm)],[f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X0 )
        = sK3 )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X0 )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $false = $true )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X0 )
        = sK3 )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X0 )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( sK3 = X1 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( sK3 = X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
       => ( sK3 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK3 = Y0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
         => ( sK3 = Y0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
       != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem  : SEU525^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:25:08 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.26/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.26/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.26/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.47  % File     : SEU525^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.26/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.26/0.47  % Problem  : Preliminary Notions - Equality Laws
% 0.26/0.47  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.26/0.47  % English  : (! phi:i>o.exu (^ x:i.phi x) -> (? x:i.! y:i.phi y <-> y = x))
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.26/0.47  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.26/0.47  % Names    : ZFC027l [Bro08]
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.26/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.15 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.12 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.33 v3.7.0
% 0.26/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   2 unt;   2 typ;   2 def)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :   10 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &;   9   @)
% 0.26/0.47  %                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    3 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.26/0.47  %            Number of variables   :   11 (   3   ^;   5   !;   3   ?;  11   :)
% 0.26/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=405
% 0.26/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.47  thf(exu_type,type,
% 0.26/0.47      exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  thf(exu,definition,
% 0.26/0.47      ( exu
% 0.26/0.47      = ( ^ [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.26/0.47          ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.26/0.47            ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 0.26/0.47            & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 0.26/0.47                ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.26/0.47               => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  thf(exuE1_type,type,
% 0.26/0.47      exuE1: $o ).
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  thf(exuE1,definition,
% 0.26/0.47      ( exuE1
% 0.26/0.47      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.26/0.47            ( ( exu
% 0.26/0.47              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.26/0.47           => ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.26/0.47                ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 0.26/0.47                & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 0.26/0.47                    ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.26/0.47                   => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  thf(exuE2,conjecture,
% 0.26/0.47      ( exuE1
% 0.26/0.47     => ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.26/0.47          ( ( exu
% 0.26/0.47            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.26/0.47         => ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.26/0.47            ! [Xy: $i] :
% 0.26/0.47              ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.26/0.47            <=> ( Xy = Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.26/0.47  
% 0.26/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.25  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.49/1.25  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.49/1.25  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:25:09 EST 2026
% 1.49/1.25  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.49/1.25  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.49/1.25  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.49/1.25  
% 1.49/1.25  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1qSkGFMI77/DTF2DTF22173.p
% See solution above
% 1.49/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.26  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.49/1.26  thf(exu_type,type,
% 1.49/1.26      exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 1.49/1.26  
% 1.49/1.26  thf(exu,definition,
% 1.49/1.26      ( exu
% 1.49/1.26      = ( ^ [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.49/1.26          ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.49/1.26            ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.26            & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 1.49/1.26                ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.49/1.26               => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.26  
% 1.49/1.26  thf(exuE1_type,type,
% 1.49/1.26      exuE1: $o ).
% 1.49/1.26  
% 1.49/1.26  thf(exuE1,definition,
% 1.49/1.26      ( exuE1
% 1.49/1.26      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.49/1.26            ( ( exu
% 1.49/1.26              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.49/1.26           => ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.49/1.26                ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.26                & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 1.49/1.26                    ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.49/1.26                   => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.26  
% 1.49/1.26  thf(exuE2,conjecture,
% 1.49/1.26      ( exuE1
% 1.49/1.26     => ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.49/1.26          ( ( exu
% 1.49/1.26            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.49/1.26         => ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.49/1.26            ! [Xy: $i] :
% 1.49/1.26              ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.49/1.26            <=> ( Xy = Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (22294)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_22173 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.49/1.27  % (22288)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_22173 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_22173 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/1.27  
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (22289)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (22288)First to succeed.
% 1.49/1.28  % (22294)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.49/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_22173
% 1.49/1.28  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_22173
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_0, type, exu: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_14, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_15, type, sK1: $i > $i).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f59,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    $false),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f56])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f56,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (sK3 != sK3) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f54,f34])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ((sK0 @ sK3) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (((sK0 @ sK3) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (sK3 = Y0))))) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1)))))) @ sK3) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f22,f18])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (exu = (^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2)) & (X0 @ X1)))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.49/1.28    (exu = (^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2)) & (X0 @ X1)))))),
% 1.49/1.28    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1qSkGFMI77/DTF2THF_22173.p',exu)).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X1 : $i] : ((($true != (sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1))) | ((sK1 @ X1) != X1)) & (($true = (sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1))) | ((sK1 @ X1) = X1)))) & (exuE1 = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f14,f16,f15])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) = $true) & ! [X1 : $i] : ? [X2 : $i] : ((((X0 @ X2) != $true) | (X1 != X2)) & (((X0 @ X2) = $true) | (X1 = X2)))) => (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X1 : $i] : ? [X2 : $i] : ((((sK0 @ X2) != $true) | (X1 != X2)) & (((sK0 @ X2) = $true) | (X1 = X2))))),
% 1.49/1.28    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ! [X1 : $i] : (? [X2 : $i] : ((((sK0 @ X2) != $true) | (X1 != X2)) & (((sK0 @ X2) = $true) | (X1 = X2))) => ((($true != (sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1))) | ((sK1 @ X1) != X1)) & (($true = (sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1))) | ((sK1 @ X1) = X1))))),
% 1.49/1.28    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) = $true) & ! [X1 : $i] : ? [X2 : $i] : ((((X0 @ X2) != $true) | (X1 != X2)) & (((X0 @ X2) = $true) | (X1 = X2)))) & (exuE1 = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) = $true) & ! [X1 : $i] : ? [X2 : $i] : ((X1 = X2) <~> ((X0 @ X2) = $true))) & (exuE1 = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~((exuE1 = $true) => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) = $true) => ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X1 = X2) <=> ((X0 @ X2) = $true))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~((exuE1 = $true) => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) = $true) => ? [X2 : $i] : ! [X3 : $i] : (((X0 @ X3) = $true) <=> (X2 = X3))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~(exuE1 => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ? [X2 : $i] : ! [X3 : $i] : ((X0 @ X3) <=> (X2 = X3))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~(exuE1 => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) <=> (X1 = X2))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f3,conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.28    exuE1 => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) <=> (X1 = X2)))),
% 1.49/1.28    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1qSkGFMI77/DTF2THF_22173.p',exuE2)).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f54,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X0) != $true) | (sK3 != X0)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f50])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f50,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((X0 != X0) | (sK3 != X0) | ((sK0 @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f46])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f46,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X0) = X0) | (sK3 != X0)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(equality_factoring,[status(thm)],[f44])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X0) = sK3) | ((sK1 @ X0) = X0)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false = $true) | ((sK1 @ X0) = sK3) | ((sK1 @ X0) = X0)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f38])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ X1)) | (sK3 = X1)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f37])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ X1)) | ((sK3 = X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = ((sK0 @ X1) => (sK3 = X1)))) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f35])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (sK3 = Y0))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f33])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (sK3 = Y0)))) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = (sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1))) | ((sK1 @ X1) = X1)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true != (sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1))) | ((sK1 @ X1) != X1)) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.49/1.28  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_22173
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.49/1.28  
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.28  % (22288)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.28  % (22287)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------