↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU527_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:39:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.00s 12.75s
% Output   : Refutation 5.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  20 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   96 (  33 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  230 (  28   ~;  35   |;   6   &; 126   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  35  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   0   ^;  62   !;   0   ?;  64   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(emptyset_decl,type,
    emptyset: $i ).

thf(setadjoin_decl,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(emptysetE_decl,type,
    emptysetE: $o ).

thf(setadjoinE_decl,type,
    setadjoinE: $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( emptyset @ ( B @ setadjoin ) @ ( A @ in ) )
             => ( A = B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( emptyset @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( sk1 @ in ) )
           => ( sk1 = A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ( emptysetE
    = ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) )
         => ! [B: $o] : B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',emptysetE) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( emptysetE
    = ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) )
         => ! [B: $o] : B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( emptysetE
    = ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) )
         => ! [B: $o] : B ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( emptysetE
   => ( setadjoinE
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( emptyset @ ( B @ setadjoin ) @ ( A @ in ) )
         => ( A = B ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',uniqinunit) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( emptysetE
     => ( setadjoinE
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( emptyset @ ( B @ setadjoin ) @ ( A @ in ) )
           => ( A = B ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ( emptysetE
     => ( setadjoinE
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( emptyset @ ( B @ setadjoin ) @ ( A @ in ) )
           => ( A = B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( sk1 != sk2 )
    & ( emptyset @ ( sk2 @ setadjoin ) @ ( sk1 @ in ) )
    & setadjoinE
    & emptysetE ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    emptysetE,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ! [B: $o] : B ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[15,7]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( B
      | ~ ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[16]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( B
       != ( ~ ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[23:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( ~ ( emptyset @ ( D @ in ) ) ))]]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( emptyset @ ( A @ in ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    emptyset @ ( sk2 @ setadjoin ) @ ( sk1 @ in ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( setadjoinE
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) )
         => ! [D: $o] :
              ( ( ( C = A )
               => D )
             => ( ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
                 => D )
               => D ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setadjoinE) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( setadjoinE
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) )
         => ! [D: $o] :
              ( ( ( C = A )
               => D )
             => ( ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
                 => D )
               => D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( setadjoinE
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) )
         => ! [D: $o] :
              ( ( ( C = A )
               => D )
             => ( ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
                 => D )
               => D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    setadjoinE,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) )
     => ! [D: $o] :
          ( ( ( C = A )
           => D )
         => ( ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => D )
           => D ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[13,8]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [D: $o,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D
        | ~ D
        | ~ D
        | ~ ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) ) )
      & ( D
        | ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
        | ~ D
        | ~ ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) ) )
      & ( D
        | ~ D
        | ( C = A )
        | ~ ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) ) )
      & ( D
        | ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
        | ( C = A )
        | ~ ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[44]) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [D: $o,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( D
      | ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
      | ( C = A )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ! [D: $o,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( D
      | ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) )
      | ( C = A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[46]) ).

thf(102,plain,
    ! [D: $o,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( emptyset @ ( sk2 @ setadjoin ) @ ( sk1 @ in ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) ) )
      | D
      | ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( C = A ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,78]) ).

thf(103,plain,
    ! [D: $o,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( emptyset @ ( sk2 @ setadjoin ) @ ( sk1 @ in ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ setadjoin ) @ ( C @ in ) ) )
      | D
      | ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
      | ( C = A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[102]) ).

thf(104,plain,
    ! [A: $o] :
      ( A
      | ( emptyset @ ( sk1 @ in ) )
      | ( sk2 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[103:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 )),bind(B,$thf( emptyset )),bind(C,$thf( sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(160,plain,
    ! [A: $o] :
      ( A
      | ( emptyset @ ( sk1 @ in ) )
      | ( sk2 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[104]) ).

thf(241,plain,
    ! [A: $o] :
      ( A
      | $false
      | ( sk2 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[160,35]) ).

thf(242,plain,
    ! [A: $o] :
      ( A
      | ( sk2 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[241]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    sk1 != sk2,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    sk2 != sk1,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(243,plain,
    ! [A: $o] : A,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[242,11]) ).

thf(246,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[35,243]) ).

thf(247,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[246]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU527_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/10.41  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/10.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/10.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/10.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/10.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/10.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/10.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/10.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 10:09:07 UTC 2026
% 0.15/10.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/10.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.18/11.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.27/11.20  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (190ms). 
% 1.40/11.21  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.00/11.62  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.00/11.63  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.00/11.70  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.20/11.71  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.20/11.75  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.20/11.79  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.20/11.79  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.20/11.80  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.37/11.80  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 2.37/11.80  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.37/11.81  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.00/12.75  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.00/12.75  % Time passed: 2189ms (effective reasoning time: 1529ms)
% 5.00/12.75  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.00/12.75  % Axioms used in derivation (2): emptysetE, setadjoinE
% 5.00/12.75  % No. of inferences in proof: 33
% 5.00/12.75  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2189 ms resp. 1529 ms w/o parsing
% 5.00/12.78  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.00/12.78  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------