↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU530^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:01:50 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.43s 3.67s
% Output   : Proof 3.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SEU530^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 04:49:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.43/3.67  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.43/3.67  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq uniqinunit (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → Eq Xx Xy)) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq eqinunit (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset))) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (uniqinunit → eqinunit → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → in Xy (setadjoin Xx emptyset))) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #3 (by clausification #[0]): Eq uniqinunit (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → Eq Xx Xy)
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #17 (by clausification #[1]): Eq eqinunit (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset))
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #21 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (uniqinunit → eqinunit → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → in Xy (setadjoin Xx emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): Eq uniqinunit True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #23 (by clausification #[21]): Eq (eqinunit → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → in Xy (setadjoin Xx emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #24 (by backward demodulation #[22, 3]): Eq True (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → Eq Xx Xy)
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #27 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), in a (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → Eq a Xy) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (in a (setadjoin a_1 emptyset) → Eq a a_1) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #29 (by clausification #[28]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a (setadjoin a_1 emptyset)) False) (Eq (Eq a a_1) True)
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #30 (by clausification #[29]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a (setadjoin a_1 emptyset)) False) (Eq a a_1)
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #31 (by clausification #[23]): Eq eqinunit True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #32 (by clausification #[23]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → in Xy (setadjoin Xx emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #33 (by backward demodulation #[31, 17]): Eq True (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset))
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #34 (by clausification #[33]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq a Xy → in a (setadjoin Xy emptyset)) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq a a_1 → in a (setadjoin a_1 emptyset)) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #36 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (Eq a a_1) False) (Eq (in a (setadjoin a_1 emptyset)) True)
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a (setadjoin a_1 emptyset)) True) (Ne a a_1)
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #38 (by destructive equality resolution #[37]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (in a (setadjoin a emptyset)) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #39 (by clausification #[32]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.43/3.67    Eq (Not (∀ (Xy : Iota), in (skS.0 2 a) (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → in Xy (setadjoin (skS.0 2 a) emptyset))) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #40 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), in (skS.0 2 a) (setadjoin Xy emptyset) → in Xy (setadjoin (skS.0 2 a) emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #41 (by clausification #[40]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.43/3.67    Eq (Not (in (skS.0 2 a) (setadjoin (skS.0 3 a a_1) emptyset) → in (skS.0 3 a a_1) (setadjoin (skS.0 2 a) emptyset)))
% 3.43/3.67      True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #42 (by clausification #[41]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.43/3.67    Eq (in (skS.0 2 a) (setadjoin (skS.0 3 a a_1) emptyset) → in (skS.0 3 a a_1) (setadjoin (skS.0 2 a) emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #43 (by clausification #[42]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a) (setadjoin (skS.0 3 a a_1) emptyset)) True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #44 (by clausification #[42]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1) (setadjoin (skS.0 2 a) emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #45 (by superposition #[43, 30]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #62 (by clausification #[45]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1)
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #64 (by forward demodulation #[44, 62]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a) (setadjoin (skS.0 2 a) emptyset)) False
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #65 (by superposition #[64, 38]): Eq False True
% 3.43/3.67  Clause #66 (by clausification #[65]): False
% 3.43/3.67  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------