↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SEU533^2 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n096.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32286.75MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 17 13:32:23 EDT 2014

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % Problem  : SEU533^2 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % Computer : n096.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% % Memory   : 32286.75MB
% % OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% % CPULimit : 300
% % DateTime : Thu Jul 17 10:32:36 CDT 2014
% % CPUTime  : 0.38 
% Python 2.7.5
% Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x13b0320>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x13b05f0>) of role type named in_type
% Using role type
% Declaring in:(fofType->(fofType->Prop))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x140c3f8>, <kernel.Single object at 0x13b0f80>) of role type named emptyset_type
% Using role type
% Declaring emptyset:fofType
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x13b05f0>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x13b0440>) of role type named setadjoin_type
% Using role type
% Declaring setadjoin:(fofType->(fofType->fofType))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x13b0908>, <kernel.Sort object at 0xe9f1b8>) of role type named setadjoinIL_type
% Using role type
% Declaring setadjoinIL:Prop
% FOF formula (((eq Prop) setadjoinIL) (forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xx) ((setadjoin Xx) Xy)))) of role definition named setadjoinIL
% A new definition: (((eq Prop) setadjoinIL) (forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xx) ((setadjoin Xx) Xy))))
% Defined: setadjoinIL:=(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xx) ((setadjoin Xx) Xy)))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1410290>, <kernel.Sort object at 0xe9f1b8>) of role type named setadjoinIR_type
% Using role type
% Declaring setadjoinIR:Prop
% FOF formula (((eq Prop) setadjoinIR) (forall (Xx:fofType) (A:fofType) (Xy:fofType), (((in Xy) A)->((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) A))))) of role definition named setadjoinIR
% A new definition: (((eq Prop) setadjoinIR) (forall (Xx:fofType) (A:fofType) (Xy:fofType), (((in Xy) A)->((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) A)))))
% Defined: setadjoinIR:=(forall (Xx:fofType) (A:fofType) (Xy:fofType), (((in Xy) A)->((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) A))))
% FOF formula (setadjoinIL->(setadjoinIR->(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))))) of role conjecture named upairsetIR
% Conjecture to prove = (setadjoinIL->(setadjoinIR->(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))))):Prop
% We need to prove ['(setadjoinIL->(setadjoinIR->(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))))))']
% Parameter fofType:Type.
% Parameter in:(fofType->(fofType->Prop)).
% Parameter emptyset:fofType.
% Parameter setadjoin:(fofType->(fofType->fofType)).
% Definition setadjoinIL:=(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xx) ((setadjoin Xx) Xy))):Prop.
% Definition setadjoinIR:=(forall (Xx:fofType) (A:fofType) (Xy:fofType), (((in Xy) A)->((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) A)))):Prop.
% Trying to prove (setadjoinIL->(setadjoinIR->(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))))))
% Found x10:=(x1 emptyset):((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))
% Found (x1 emptyset) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))
% Found ((x Xy) emptyset) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))
% Found ((x Xy) emptyset) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))
% Found (x0000 ((x Xy) emptyset)) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))
% Found ((x000 Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset)) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))
% Found (((x00 ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset)) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))
% Found ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset)) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))
% Found (fun (Xy:fofType)=> ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset))) as proof of ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))
% Found (fun (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType)=> ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset))) as proof of (forall (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))))
% Found (fun (x0:setadjoinIR) (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType)=> ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset))) as proof of (forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))))
% Found (fun (x:setadjoinIL) (x0:setadjoinIR) (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType)=> ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset))) as proof of (setadjoinIR->(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)))))
% Found (fun (x:setadjoinIL) (x0:setadjoinIR) (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType)=> ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset))) as proof of (setadjoinIL->(setadjoinIR->(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((in Xy) ((setadjoin Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset))))))
% Got proof (fun (x:setadjoinIL) (x0:setadjoinIR) (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType)=> ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset)))
% Time elapsed = 0.064539s
% node=11 cost=-85.000000 depth=11
% ::::::::::::::::::::::
% % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% (fun (x:setadjoinIL) (x0:setadjoinIR) (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType)=> ((((x0 Xx) ((setadjoin Xy) emptyset)) Xy) ((x Xy) emptyset)))
% % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% EOF
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------