↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU536^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.48s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  130 (  39 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  139 (  29   ~;   7   |;  17   &;  74   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0   ^;  21   !;  16   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(f17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X2 @ sK1 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ( ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( $true
             != ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
            | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
        & ? [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             != $true ) ) )
   => ( ! [X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X2 @ sK1 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X3 @ sK1 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X3: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X3 @ sK1 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
       != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ! [X2: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
          | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
             => ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true ) )
       => ? [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
              = $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
             => ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true ) )
       => ? [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             != $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             => ( X0 @ X2 ) )
       => ? [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
            & ~ ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             => ( X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            & ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i] :
      ( ~ ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           => ( X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
          & ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WKFqfdQlZF/DTF2THF_32729.p',quantDeMorgan1) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ sK1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU536^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:26:14 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  % File     : SEU536^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.19/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.47  % Problem  : Preliminary Notions - Bounded Quantifier Laws
% 0.19/0.47  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.47  % English  : (! A:i.! phi:i>o.~(! x:i.in x A -> phi x) ->
% 0.19/0.47  %            (? x:i.in x A & ~(phi x)))
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.47  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.19/0.47  % Names    : ZFC038l [Bro08]
% 0.19/0.47  %          : ZFC045l [Bro08]
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  % Rating   : 0.17 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.17 v8.2.0, 0.18 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.19/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   2   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   6   @)
% 0.19/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   3   !;   1   ?;   4   :)
% 0.19/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=449
% 0.19/0.47  %          : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=120
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  thf(in,type,
% 0.19/0.47      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(quantDeMorgan1,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.47      ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.19/0.47        ( ~ ! [Xx: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47              ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.19/0.47             => ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.19/0.47       => ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.19/0.47            & ~ ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.24  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.48/1.24  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.48/1.24  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:26:15 EST 2026
% 1.48/1.24  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.48/1.24  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.48/1.24  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.48/1.24  
% 1.48/1.24  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WKFqfdQlZF/DTF2DTF32729.p
% See solution above
% 1.48/1.24  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.48/1.25  thf(in,type,
% 1.48/1.25      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.48/1.25  
% 1.48/1.25  thf(quantDeMorgan1,conjecture,
% 1.48/1.25      ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.48/1.25        ( ~ ! [Xx: $i] :
% 1.48/1.25              ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.48/1.25             => ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.48/1.25       => ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.48/1.25            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.48/1.25            & ~ ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.26  % (401)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_32729 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_32729 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.48/1.27  % (399)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_32729 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.27  % (401)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)First to succeed.
% 1.48/1.27  % (399)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.48/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_32729
% 1.48/1.27  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_32729
% 1.48/1.27  thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    $false),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f12])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true)),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ! [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ sK1) != $true) | ((sK0 @ X2) = $true)) & (((in @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true))),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : (($true != (in @ X2 @ X1)) | ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) & ? [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ X3) != $true))) => (! [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ sK1) != $true) | ((sK0 @ X2) = $true)) & ? [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ X3) != $true)))),
% 1.48/1.27    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ? [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ X3) != $true)) => (((in @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true))),
% 1.48/1.27    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : (($true != (in @ X2 @ X1)) | ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) & ? [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ X3) != $true)))),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((X0 @ X3) = $true)) & ? [X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X2 @ X1)) & ((X0 @ X2) != $true)))),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (~! [X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X2 @ X1)) => ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) => ? [X3 : $i] : (((X0 @ X3) != $true) & ((in @ X3 @ X1) = $true)))),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (~! [X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X2 @ X1)) => ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) => ? [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X1) = $true) & ~((X0 @ X3) = $true)))),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (~! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X1) => (X0 @ X2)) => ? [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X1) & ~(X0 @ X3)))),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.27    ~! [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i] : (~! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (X1 @ X2)) => ? [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.27    ! [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i] : (~! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (X1 @ X2)) => ? [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.48/1.27    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WKFqfdQlZF/DTF2THF_32729.p',quantDeMorgan1)).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ($true != $true) | ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f13])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ((in @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.48/1.27  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.48/1.27    ( ! [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ sK1) != $true) | ((sK0 @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 1.48/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.48/1.27  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_32729
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.27  % (397)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.27  % (396)Success in time 0.005 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------