↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU539^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.37s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  130 (  39 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  139 (  29   ~;   7   |;  17   &;  74   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0   ^;  21   !;  16   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(f17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
     != $true )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X3 @ sK1 )
         != $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             != $true ) )
        & ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              = $true ) ) )
   => ( ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X2 @ sK1 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X3 @ sK1 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X2 @ sK1 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
       != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i] :
      ( ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             != $true ) )
       => ~ ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             != $true ) )
       => ~ ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            & ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ~ ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
             => ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            & ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ~ ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
          & ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ~ ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iBn2dxi99G/DTF2THF_16980.p',quantDeMorgan4) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X3 @ sK1 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem  : SEU539^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:26:49 EST 2026
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.29  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.18/0.38  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.18/0.38  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.18/0.38  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.38  % File     : SEU539^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.18/0.38  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.18/0.38  % Problem  : Preliminary Notions - Bounded Quantifier Laws
% 0.18/0.38  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.18/0.38  % English  : (! A:i.! phi:i>o.(? x:i.in x A & ~(phi x)) -> ~(! x:i.in x A ->
% 0.18/0.38  %            phi x))
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.18/0.38  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.18/0.38  % Names    : ZFC041l [Bro08]
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.18/0.38  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.00 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.18/0.38  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   2   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   6   @)
% 0.18/0.38  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.18/0.38  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   3   !;   1   ?;   4   :)
% 0.18/0.38  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=452
% 0.18/0.38  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.38  thf(in,type,
% 0.18/0.38      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  thf(quantDeMorgan4,conjecture,
% 0.18/0.38      ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.18/0.38        ( ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.18/0.38            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.18/0.38            & ~ ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.18/0.38       => ~ ! [Xx: $i] :
% 0.18/0.38              ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.18/0.38             => ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.38  ------------------------
% 1.37/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.37/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.37/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:26:50 EST 2026
% 1.37/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.37/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.37/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.37/1.26  
% 1.37/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iBn2dxi99G/DTF2DTF16980.p
% See solution above
% 1.37/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.37/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.37/1.27  thf(in,type,
% 1.37/1.27      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.37/1.27  
% 1.37/1.27  thf(quantDeMorgan4,conjecture,
% 1.37/1.27      ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.37/1.27        ( ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.37/1.27            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.37/1.27            & ~ ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.37/1.27       => ~ ! [Xx: $i] :
% 1.37/1.27              ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.37/1.27             => ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 1.37/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  % (17080)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16980 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17078)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16980 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16980 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17079)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16980 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16980 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17083)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16980 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17084)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16980 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17083)First to succeed.
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.37/1.29  
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  % (17081)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.37/1.29  
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  % (17082)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  % (17078)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.37/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_16980
% 1.37/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_16980
% 1.37/1.30  thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    $false),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f13])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true)),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    (((in @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ sK1) != $true) | ($true = (sK0 @ X3)))),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (? [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((X0 @ X3) = $true))) => (? [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ sK1) != $true) | ($true = (sK0 @ X3))))),
% 1.37/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ? [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ X2) != $true)) => (((in @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true))),
% 1.37/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (? [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((X0 @ X3) = $true)))),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ? [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i] : (? [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) & ((X1 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X0) != $true) | ((X1 @ X3) = $true)))),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ~! [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i] : (? [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) & ((X1 @ X2) != $true)) => ~! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true) => ((X1 @ X3) = $true)))),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) & ~((X1 @ X2) = $true)) => ~! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true) => ((X1 @ X3) = $true)))),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X2)) => ~! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X0) => (X1 @ X3)))),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.37/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X2)) => ~! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.37/1.30    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X2)) => ~! [X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.37/1.30    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iBn2dxi99G/DTF2THF_16980.p',quantDeMorgan4)).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f14])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ((in @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.37/1.30  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.37/1.30    ( ! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ sK1) != $true) | ($true = (sK0 @ X3))) )),
% 1.37/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.37/1.30  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_16980
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.37/1.30  
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.30  % (17083)------------------------------
% 1.37/1.30  % (17077)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------