↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU546^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.63s 1.31s
% Output   : Refutation 1.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  229 (  91 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  218 (  28   ~;  25   |;  22   &; 106   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  21  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   7  !!;   4  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (  29   ^;  29   !;  14   ?;  72   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    sK3: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    sK4: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    sK5: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    sK6: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i ).

thf(f83,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f81]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f26,f80]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f79]) ).

thf(f79,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $false )
    | ( sK1 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f35,f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( sK3 @ sK1 )
    = sK1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f69]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK1 )
      = sK1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f68,f26]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK3 @ X0 )
        = sK1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f67]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK3 @ X0 )
        = sK1 )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK3 @ X1 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK3 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X1
            = ( sK3 @ X1 ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 = Y0 ) )
          @ ( sK3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 = Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
        & ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 = Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $false ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $false ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
               => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f21,f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X1 = X2 ) )
          & ( X0 @ X1 ) ) )
    = exu ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X1 = X2 ) )
          & ( X0 @ X1 ) ) )
    = exu ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L5SDdB5SSQ/DTF2THF_26446.p',exu) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( exu
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( exu
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
     != $true )
    & ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK1 = X2 )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
        & ( ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
          | ( sK1 != X2 ) ) )
    & ( exuI1 = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f13,f15,f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ? [X1: $i] :
          ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
              | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
               != $true ) )
            & ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
              | ( X1 != X2 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ( exu
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
       != $true )
      & ? [X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
            | ( $true
             != ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
          & ( ( $true
              = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
            | ( X1 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ? [X1: $i] :
      ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
        & ( ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
          | ( X1 != X2 ) ) )
   => ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK1 = X2 )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
        & ( ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
          | ( sK1 != X2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ? [X1: $i] :
          ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
              | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
               != $true ) )
            & ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
              | ( X1 != X2 ) ) ) )
    & ( exuI1 = $true ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ? [X1: $i] :
          ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( X1 = X2 )
          <=> ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) ) )
    & ( exuI1 = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( ( exuI1 = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
          ( ? [X1: $i] :
            ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X1 = X2 )
            <=> ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true ) )
         => ( $true
            = ( exu
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ( exuI1
     => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
          ( ? [X1: $i] :
            ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            <=> ( X1 = X2 ) )
         => ( exu
            @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( exuI1
     => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
          ( ? [X1: $i] :
            ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            <=> ( X1 = X2 ) )
         => ( exu
            @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ( exuI1
   => ! [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X1: $i] :
          ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          <=> ( X1 = X2 ) )
       => ( exu
          @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L5SDdB5SSQ/DTF2THF_26446.p',exuI2) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( sK1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK3 @ X1 )
       != X1 )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( X1
          = ( sK3 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( sK1 != X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU546^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:26:18 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.32/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.32/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.32/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.47  % File     : SEU546^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.32/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.32/0.47  % Problem  : Preliminary Notions - Equivalence Laws
% 0.32/0.47  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.32/0.47  % English  : (! phi:i>o.(? x:i.! y:i.phi y <-> y = x) -> exu (^ x:i.phi x))
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.32/0.47  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.32/0.47  % Names    : ZFC048l [Bro08]
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.32/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.15 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v5.1.0, 0.40 v5.0.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.32/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   2 unt;   2 typ;   2 def)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :   10 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &;   9   @)
% 0.32/0.47  %                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    3 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.32/0.47  %            Number of variables   :   11 (   3   ^;   5   !;   3   ?;  11   :)
% 0.32/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=409
% 0.32/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.47  thf(exu_type,type,
% 0.32/0.47      exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  thf(exu,definition,
% 0.32/0.47      ( exu
% 0.32/0.47      = ( ^ [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.32/0.47          ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.32/0.47            ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 0.32/0.47            & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 0.32/0.47                ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.32/0.47               => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  thf(exuI1_type,type,
% 0.32/0.47      exuI1: $o ).
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  thf(exuI1,definition,
% 0.32/0.47      ( exuI1
% 0.32/0.47      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.32/0.47            ( ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.32/0.47                ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 0.32/0.47                & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 0.32/0.47                    ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.32/0.47                   => ( Xx = Xy ) ) )
% 0.32/0.47           => ( exu
% 0.32/0.47              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  thf(exuI2,conjecture,
% 0.32/0.47      ( exuI1
% 0.32/0.47     => ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.32/0.47          ( ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.32/0.47            ! [Xy: $i] :
% 0.32/0.47              ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.32/0.47            <=> ( Xy = Xx ) )
% 0.32/0.47         => ( exu
% 0.32/0.47            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.32/0.47  
% 0.32/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.27  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.47/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.47/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:26:19 EST 2026
% 1.47/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.47/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.47/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.47/1.28  
% 1.47/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L5SDdB5SSQ/DTF2DTF26446.p
% See solution above
% 1.47/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.47/1.29  thf(exu_type,type,
% 1.47/1.29      exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 1.47/1.29  
% 1.47/1.29  thf(exu,definition,
% 1.47/1.29      ( exu
% 1.47/1.29      = ( ^ [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.47/1.29          ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.47/1.29            ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 1.47/1.29            & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 1.47/1.29                ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.47/1.29               => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.47/1.29  
% 1.47/1.29  thf(exuI1_type,type,
% 1.47/1.29      exuI1: $o ).
% 1.47/1.29  
% 1.47/1.29  thf(exuI1,definition,
% 1.47/1.29      ( exuI1
% 1.47/1.29      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.47/1.29            ( ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.47/1.29                ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 1.47/1.29                & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 1.47/1.29                    ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.47/1.29                   => ( Xx = Xy ) ) )
% 1.47/1.29           => ( exu
% 1.47/1.29              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.47/1.29  
% 1.47/1.29  thf(exuI2,conjecture,
% 1.47/1.29      ( exuI1
% 1.47/1.29     => ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.47/1.29          ( ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.47/1.29            ! [Xy: $i] :
% 1.47/1.29              ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.47/1.29            <=> ( Xy = Xx ) )
% 1.47/1.29         => ( exu
% 1.47/1.29            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.47/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26446 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.63/1.30  
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.30  % (26777)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.30  % (26775)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26446 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)First to succeed.
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.63/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_26446
% 1.63/1.31  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_26446
% 1.63/1.31  thf(func_def_0, type, exu: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(func_def_3, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(func_def_15, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(func_def_18, type, sK3: $i > $i).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(func_def_20, type, sK4: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(func_def_21, type, sK5: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(func_def_22, type, sK6: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f83,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    $false),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f81])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f81,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ($false = $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f26,f80])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f80,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((sK0 @ sK1) = $false)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f79])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f79,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((sK0 @ sK1) = $false) | (sK1 != sK1)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f35,f74])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f74,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((sK3 @ sK1) = sK1)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f69])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f69,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ($false = $true) | ((sK3 @ sK1) = sK1)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f68,f26])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f68,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ X0)) | ((sK3 @ X0) = sK1)) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f67])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f67,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ X0)) | ((sK3 @ X0) = sK1) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f34])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ (sK3 @ X1)) = $true) | ($false = (sK0 @ X1))) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ X1)) | (((sK0 @ (sK3 @ X1)) => (X1 = (sK3 @ X1))) = $false)) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (X1 = Y0))) @ (sK3 @ X1)) = $false) | ($false = (sK0 @ X1))) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ X1)) | ($false = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (X1 = Y0)))))) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((sK0 @ X1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (X1 = Y0))))) = $false)) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1)))))) @ X1) = $false)) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1))))))) != $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) != $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f21,f22])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))))),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))))),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2)) & (X0 @ X1)))) = exu)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2)) & (X0 @ X1)))) = exu)),
% 1.63/1.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L5SDdB5SSQ/DTF2THF_26446.p',exu)).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) != $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) != $true) & ! [X2 : $i] : (((sK1 = X2) | ($true != (sK0 @ X2))) & (($true = (sK0 @ X2)) | (sK1 != X2)))) & (exuI1 = $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f13,f15,f14])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true != (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : (((X1 = X2) | ((X0 @ X2) != $true)) & (((X0 @ X2) = $true) | (X1 != X2)))) => (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) != $true) & ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : (((X1 = X2) | ($true != (sK0 @ X2))) & (($true = (sK0 @ X2)) | (X1 != X2))))),
% 1.63/1.31    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : (((X1 = X2) | ($true != (sK0 @ X2))) & (($true = (sK0 @ X2)) | (X1 != X2))) => ! [X2 : $i] : (((sK1 = X2) | ($true != (sK0 @ X2))) & (($true = (sK0 @ X2)) | (sK1 != X2)))),
% 1.63/1.31    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true != (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : (((X1 = X2) | ((X0 @ X2) != $true)) & (((X0 @ X2) = $true) | (X1 != X2)))) & (exuI1 = $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true != (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X1 = X2) <=> ((X0 @ X2) = $true))) & (exuI1 = $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ~((exuI1 = $true) => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X1 = X2) <=> ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) => ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))))))),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ~(exuI1 => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) <=> (X1 = X2)) => (exu @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X3)))))),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.63/1.31    ~(exuI1 => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) <=> (X1 = X2)) => (exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1)))))),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f3,conjecture,(
% 1.63/1.31    exuI1 => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : ! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) <=> (X1 = X2)) => (exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))))),
% 1.63/1.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L5SDdB5SSQ/DTF2THF_26446.p',exuI2)).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X2 : $i] : (($true != (sK0 @ X2)) | (sK1 = X2)) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK3 @ X1) != X1) | ($false = (sK0 @ X1))) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f33])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (X1 = (sK3 @ X1))) | ($false = (sK0 @ X1))) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ((sK0 @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.63/1.31  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.63/1.31    ( ! [X2 : $i] : (($true = (sK0 @ X2)) | (sK1 != X2)) )),
% 1.63/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.63/1.31  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_26446
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.63/1.31  
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.31  % (26775)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.31  % (26772)Success in time 0.014 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------