↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU547^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:01:52 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.56s 3.73s
% Output   : Proof 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SEU547^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 05:11:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.56/3.73  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/3.73  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (A B : Iota), Eq A B → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx A → in Xy B)) True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (A B : Iota), Eq A B → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx A → in Xy B) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B : Iota), Eq (skS.0 0 a) B → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xy B)) True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), Eq (skS.0 0 a) B → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xy B) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.73    Eq (Not (Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xy (skS.0 1 a a_1)))
% 3.56/3.73      True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.73    Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → ∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xy (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq Xx Xy → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xy (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.73    Eq (Not (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) Xy → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in Xy (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.73    Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) Xy → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in Xy (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.73    Eq
% 3.56/3.73      (Not
% 3.56/3.73        (Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.56/3.73          in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3) (skS.0 1 a a_1)))
% 3.56/3.73      True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.73    Eq
% 3.56/3.73      (Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.56/3.73        in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3) (skS.0 1 a a_1))
% 3.56/3.73      False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3)) True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #15 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3)
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #16 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #17 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #18 (by forward demodulation #[17, 8]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2 a_3) (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #19 (by forward demodulation #[18, 15]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #20 (by superposition #[19, 16]): Eq False True
% 3.56/3.73  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): False
% 3.56/3.73  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------