↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU557^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.48s 1.29s
% Output   : Refutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   70 (  27 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  402 ( 121 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  387 (  46   ~;  45   |;  33   &; 199   @)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  40  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   20 (  20   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   21 (  16 usr;  13 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  11  !!;   6  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  112 (  68   ^;  36   !;   8   ?; 112   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    descr: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK1: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    sK5: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    sK6: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    ph7: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f185,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f98,f107,f113,f142,f179,f182]) ).

thf(f182,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f181]) ).

thf(f181,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f150,f92]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK8 )
     != $true )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f91]) ).

thf(f91,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK8 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f150,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK8 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f144]) ).

thf(f144,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK8 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f97,f42]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
      = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
        = ( sK1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X2 != X3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( descrp = $true )
    & ( exuEu = $true )
    & ( ( descr
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
     != ( descr
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( exu
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
    & ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
          = ( sK1 @ X2 ) )
        | ( X2 != X3 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( exu
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f16,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( descr
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
         != ( descr
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = ( X0 @ X3 ) )
            | ( X2 != X3 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ( descr
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
       != ( descr
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( exu
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
      & ! [X3: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
            = ( sK1 @ X2 ) )
          | ( X2 != X3 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( exu
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( descrp = $true )
    & ( exuEu = $true )
    & ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( descr
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
         != ( descr
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = ( X0 @ X3 ) )
            | ( X2 != X3 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( descr
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
         != ( descr
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( exu
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = ( X0 @ X3 ) )
            | ( X2 != X3 ) ) )
    & ( exuEu = $true )
    & ( descrp = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ~ ( ( descrp = $true )
     => ( ( exuEu = $true )
       => ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
            ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
                ( ( X2 = X3 )
               => ( ( X1 @ X2 )
                  = ( X0 @ X3 ) ) )
           => ( ( $true
                = ( exu
                  @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
             => ( ( $true
                  = ( exu
                    @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
               => ( ( descr
                    @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                  = ( descr
                    @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ~ ( descrp
     => ( exuEu
       => ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
            ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
                ( ( X2 = X3 )
               => ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                <=> ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
           => ( ( exu
                @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( X0 @ X4 ) )
             => ( ( exu
                  @ ^ [X5: $i] : ( X1 @ X5 ) )
               => ( ( descr
                    @ ^ [X6: $i] : ( X1 @ X6 ) )
                  = ( descr
                    @ ^ [X7: $i] : ( X0 @ X7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( descrp
     => ( exuEu
       => ! [X0: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
            ( ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
                ( ( X1 = X2 )
               => ( ( X0 @ X1 )
                <=> ( X3 @ X2 ) ) )
           => ( ( exu
                @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
             => ( ( exu
                  @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X3 @ X1 ) )
               => ( ( descr
                    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X3 @ X1 ) )
                  = ( descr
                    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    ( descrp
   => ( exuEu
     => ! [X0: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
              ( ( X1 = X2 )
             => ( ( X0 @ X1 )
              <=> ( X3 @ X2 ) ) )
         => ( ( exu
              @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
           => ( ( exu
                @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X3 @ X1 ) )
             => ( ( descr
                  @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X3 @ X1 ) )
                = ( descr
                  @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XUDcyInC6O/DTF2THF_13331.p',descr__Cong) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK8 ) )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f95]) ).

thf(f95,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK8 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f179,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f178]) ).

thf(f178,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f175]) ).

thf(f175,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f93,f106]) ).

thf(f106,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK8 ) )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f104]) ).

thf(f104,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK8 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK8 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f91]) ).

thf(f142,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f141]) ).

thf(f141,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f140,f124]) ).

thf(f124,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f96,f120]) ).

thf(f120,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = sK8 )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f118]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( sK3 = sK8 )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f93,f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
      | ( sK3 = X1 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK3 = X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
       => ( sK3 = X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK3 = Y0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
         => ( sK3 = Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      & ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK3 = Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK1 @ Y1 )
               => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK3 )
    = $true ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK1 @ Y1 )
               => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f19,f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X1 = X2 ) )
          & ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( exu
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X1 = X2 ) )
          & ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XUDcyInC6O/DTF2THF_13331.p',exu_def) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( exu
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK8 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f95]) ).

thf(f140,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f49,f138]) ).

thf(f138,plain,
    sK3 = sK4,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f135]) ).

thf(f135,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( sK3 = sK4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f134,f41]) ).

thf(f134,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f129]) ).

thf(f129,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $false = $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f42,f49]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
    = $true ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
      & ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK4 = Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
               => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
               => ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( Y1 = Y2 ) ) ) ) )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f21,f26]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( exu
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f112]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f109]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f97,f102]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK8 ) )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f100]) ).

thf(f100,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK8 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f89,f104,f100]) ).

thf(f89,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK8 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK8 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f87]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ sK8 )
   != ( sK0 @ sK8 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f86]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( descr @ sK0 )
   != ( descr @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( descr
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
   != ( descr
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f88,f95,f91]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK8 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK8 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f87]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU557^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:27:20 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  % File     : SEU557^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.19/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.47  % Problem  : A simple congruence property of descr
% 0.19/0.47  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.47  % English  : (forall phi:i>o.forall psi:i>o.(forall x:i.forall y:i.x = y ->
% 0.19/0.47  %            (phi x <-> psi y)) -> exu (lambda x:i.phi x) ->
% 0.19/0.47  %            exu (lambda x:i.psi x) -> descr (lambda x:i.phi x) =
% 0.19/0.47  %            descr (lambda x:i.psi x))
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.47  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.19/0.47  % Names    : ZFC059l [Bro08]
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.80 v5.2.0
% 0.19/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   4 typ;   3 def)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :   16 (   7 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of connectives :   34 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;  21   @)
% 0.19/0.47  %                                         (   1 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    5 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of variables   :   18 (   8   ^;   9   !;   1   ?;  18   :)
% 0.19/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=43
% 0.19/0.47  % Bugfixes : v5.2.0 - Added missing type declarations.
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  thf(exu_type,type,
% 0.19/0.47      exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(exuEu_type,type,
% 0.19/0.47      exuEu: $o ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(descr_type,type,
% 0.19/0.47      descr: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(descrp_type,type,
% 0.19/0.47      descrp: $o ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(exu_def,definition,
% 0.19/0.47      ( exu
% 0.19/0.47      = ( ^ [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.19/0.47          ? [Xx: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 0.19/0.47            & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47                ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.19/0.47               => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(exuEu_def,definition,
% 0.19/0.47      ( exuEu
% 0.19/0.47      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( ( exu
% 0.19/0.47              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.19/0.47           => ! [Xx: $i,Xy: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47                ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 0.19/0.47               => ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 0.19/0.47                 => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(descrp_def,definition,
% 0.19/0.47      ( descrp
% 0.19/0.47      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( ( exu
% 0.19/0.47              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.19/0.47           => ( Xphi
% 0.19/0.47              @ ( descr
% 0.19/0.47                @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(descr__Cong,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.47      ( descrp
% 0.19/0.47     => ( exuEu
% 0.19/0.47       => ! [Xphi: $i > $o,Xpsi: $i > $o] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( ! [Xx: $i,Xy: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47                ( ( Xx = Xy )
% 0.19/0.47               => ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 0.19/0.47                <=> ( Xpsi @ Xy ) ) )
% 0.19/0.47           => ( ( exu
% 0.19/0.47                @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.19/0.47             => ( ( exu
% 0.19/0.47                  @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xpsi @ Xx ) )
% 0.19/0.47               => ( ( descr
% 0.19/0.47                    @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 0.19/0.47                  = ( descr
% 0.19/0.47                    @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xpsi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.48/1.25  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.48/1.25  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:27:21 EST 2026
% 1.48/1.25  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.48/1.25  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.48/1.25  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.48/1.25  
% 1.48/1.25  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XUDcyInC6O/DTF2DTF13331.p
% See solution above
% 1.48/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.26  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.48/1.27  thf(exu_type,type,
% 1.48/1.27      exu: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(exuEu_type,type,
% 1.48/1.27      exuEu: $o ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(descr_type,type,
% 1.48/1.27      descr: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(descrp_type,type,
% 1.48/1.27      descrp: $o ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(exu_def,definition,
% 1.48/1.27      ( exu
% 1.48/1.27      = ( ^ [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.48/1.27          ? [Xx: $i] :
% 1.48/1.27            ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 1.48/1.27            & ! [Xy: $i] :
% 1.48/1.27                ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.48/1.27               => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(exuEu_def,definition,
% 1.48/1.27      ( exuEu
% 1.48/1.27      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.48/1.27            ( ( exu
% 1.48/1.27              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.48/1.27           => ! [Xx: $i,Xy: $i] :
% 1.48/1.27                ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 1.48/1.27               => ( ( Xphi @ Xy )
% 1.48/1.27                 => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(descrp_def,definition,
% 1.48/1.27      ( descrp
% 1.48/1.27      = ( ! [Xphi: $i > $o] :
% 1.48/1.27            ( ( exu
% 1.48/1.27              @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.48/1.27           => ( Xphi
% 1.48/1.27              @ ( descr
% 1.48/1.27                @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(descr__Cong,conjecture,
% 1.48/1.27      ( descrp
% 1.48/1.27     => ( exuEu
% 1.48/1.27       => ! [Xphi: $i > $o,Xpsi: $i > $o] :
% 1.48/1.27            ( ! [Xx: $i,Xy: $i] :
% 1.48/1.27                ( ( Xx = Xy )
% 1.48/1.27               => ( ( Xphi @ Xx )
% 1.48/1.27                <=> ( Xpsi @ Xy ) ) )
% 1.48/1.27           => ( ( exu
% 1.48/1.27                @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.48/1.27             => ( ( exu
% 1.48/1.27                  @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xpsi @ Xx ) )
% 1.48/1.27               => ( ( descr
% 1.48/1.27                    @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xx ) )
% 1.48/1.27                  = ( descr
% 1.48/1.27                    @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xpsi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_13331 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_13331 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13471)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_13331 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.28  % (13474)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.28  % (13477)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_13331 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)Termination phase: shuffling
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.28  % (13475)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.28  % (13471)First to succeed.
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.48/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_13331
% 1.48/1.29  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_13331
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_0, type, exu: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_2, type, descr: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_16, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_17, type, sK1: $i > $o).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_22, type, sK5: $i > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_23, type, sK6: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_25, type, ph7: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f185,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    $false),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f98,f107,f113,f142,f179,f182])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f182,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    spl2_1 | ~spl2_2),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f181])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f181,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    $false | (spl2_1 | ~spl2_2)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f150,f92])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f92,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ sK8) != $true) | spl2_1),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f91])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f91,definition,(
% 1.48/1.29    spl2_1 <=> ((sK1 @ sK8) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f150,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ sK8) = $true) | ~spl2_2),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f144])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f144,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ sK8) = $true) | ($false = $true) | ~spl2_2),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f97,f42])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X3 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ X3)) | ((sK1 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X3 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X3) = (sK0 @ X3))) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X3) = (sK1 @ X2)) | (X2 != X3)) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (descrp = $true) & (exuEu = $true) & (((descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ Y0))) != (descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0)))) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X3) = (sK1 @ X2)) | (X2 != X3)) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ Y0)))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f16,f17])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) != (descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0)))) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = (X0 @ X3)) | (X2 != X3)) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0))))) => (((descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ Y0))) != (descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0)))) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X3 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X3) = (sK1 @ X2)) | (X2 != X3)) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ Y0)))))),
% 1.48/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (descrp = $true) & (exuEu = $true) & ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) != (descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0)))) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = (X0 @ X3)) | (X2 != X3)) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0)))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((((descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) != (descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0)))) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0))))) & ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))))) & ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = (X0 @ X3)) | (X2 != X3))) & (exuEu = $true)) & (descrp = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~((descrp = $true) => ((exuEu = $true) => ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X2 = X3) => ((X1 @ X2) = (X0 @ X3))) => (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) => (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0)))) => ((descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0))) = (descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 @ Y0)))))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~(descrp => (exuEu => ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X2 = X3) => ((X0 @ X3) <=> (X1 @ X2))) => ((exu @ (^[X4 : $i] : (X0 @ X4))) => ((exu @ (^[X5 : $i] : (X1 @ X5))) => ((descr @ (^[X6 : $i] : (X1 @ X6))) = (descr @ (^[X7 : $i] : (X0 @ X7)))))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~(descrp => (exuEu => ! [X0 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((X1 = X2) => ((X0 @ X1) <=> (X3 @ X2))) => ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X3 @ X1))) => ((descr @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X3 @ X1))) = (descr @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1)))))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.29    descrp => (exuEu => ! [X0 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((X1 = X2) => ((X0 @ X1) <=> (X3 @ X2))) => ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X3 @ X1))) => ((descr @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X3 @ X1))) = (descr @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XUDcyInC6O/DTF2THF_13331.p',descr__Cong)).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f97,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (sK0 @ sK8)) | ~spl2_2),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f95])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f95,definition,(
% 1.48/1.29    spl2_2 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK8))),
% 1.48/1.29    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f179,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~spl2_1 | ~spl2_4),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f178])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f178,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    $false | (~spl2_1 | ~spl2_4)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f175])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f175,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($false = $true) | (~spl2_1 | ~spl2_4)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f93,f106])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f106,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($false = (sK1 @ sK8)) | ~spl2_4),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f104])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f104,definition,(
% 1.48/1.29    spl2_4 <=> ($false = (sK1 @ sK8))),
% 1.48/1.29    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f93,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ sK8) = $true) | ~spl2_1),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f91])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f142,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~spl2_1 | spl2_2),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f141])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f141,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    $false | (~spl2_1 | spl2_2)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f140,f124])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f124,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true != (sK0 @ sK3)) | (~spl2_1 | spl2_2)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f96,f120])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f120,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (sK3 = sK8) | ~spl2_1),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f118])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f118,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($false = $true) | (sK3 = sK8) | ~spl2_1),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f93,f41])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK1 @ X1)) | (sK3 = X1)) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK3 = X1) = $true) | ($false = (sK1 @ X1))) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((sK1 @ X1) => (sK3 = X1)) = $true)) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f38])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) => (sK3 = Y0))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) => (sK3 = Y0)))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f35])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = ((sK1 @ sK3) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) => (sK3 = Y0))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f34])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1)))))) @ sK3) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f33])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ Y0))) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f19,f26])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (exu = (^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2)) & (X0 @ X1)))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.48/1.29    (exu = (^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2)) & (X0 @ X1)))))),
% 1.48/1.29    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XUDcyInC6O/DTF2THF_13331.p',exu_def)).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ Y0))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f96,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true != (sK0 @ sK8)) | spl2_2),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f95])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f140,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (sK0 @ sK3))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f49,f138])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f138,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (sK3 = sK4)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f135])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f135,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($false = $true) | (sK3 = sK4)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f134,f41])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f134,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (sK1 @ sK4))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f129])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f129,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | ($false = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f42,f49])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f49,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK0 @ sK4) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f47])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (((sK0 @ sK4) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (sK4 = Y0))))) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f46])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f46,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1)))))) @ sK4))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f45])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1) & (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))))))) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f21,f26])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f113,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~spl2_2 | ~spl2_3),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f112])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f112,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    $false | (~spl2_2 | ~spl2_3)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f109])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f109,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($false = $true) | (~spl2_2 | ~spl2_3)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f97,f102])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f102,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($false = (sK0 @ sK8)) | ~spl2_3),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f100])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f100,definition,(
% 1.48/1.29    spl2_3 <=> ($false = (sK0 @ sK8))),
% 1.48/1.29    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f107,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    spl2_3 | spl2_4),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f89,f104,f100])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f89,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($false = (sK0 @ sK8)) | ($false = (sK1 @ sK8))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f87])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f87,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ sK8) != (sK0 @ sK8))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f86])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f86,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (sK0 != sK1)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f44])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((descr @ sK0) != (descr @ sK1))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ Y0))) != (descr @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f98,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    spl2_1 | spl2_2),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f88,f95,f91])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f88,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (sK0 @ sK8)) | ((sK1 @ sK8) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f87])).
% 1.48/1.29  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_13331
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.48/1.29  
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (13471)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (13470)Success in time 0.007 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------