↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU564^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:01:55 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 11.91s 12.11s
% Output   : Proof 11.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SEU564^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 06:21:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 11.91/12.11  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 11.91/12.11  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq subset fun A B => ∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx A → in Xx B) True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), subset A B → in Xx A → in Xx B)) True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), subset A B → in Xx A → in Xx B) False
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B Xx : Iota), subset (skS.0 0 a) B → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xx B)) True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B Xx : Iota), subset (skS.0 0 a) B → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xx B) False
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 11.91/12.11    Eq (Not (∀ (Xx : Iota), subset (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xx (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 11.91/12.11    Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), subset (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → in Xx (skS.0 0 a) → in Xx (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 11.91/12.11    Eq
% 11.91/12.11      (Not
% 11.91/12.11        (subset (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) →
% 11.91/12.11          in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_1)))
% 11.91/12.11      True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 11.91/12.11    Eq (subset (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_1))
% 11.91/12.11      False
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (subset (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #10 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #11 (by clausification #[0]): Eq subset fun A B => ∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx A → in Xx B
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #12 (by argument congruence #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (subset a) ((fun A B => ∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx A → in Xx B) a)
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #14 (by betaEtaReduce #[12]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (subset a) fun B => ∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx B
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #15 (by argument congruence #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (subset a a_1) ((fun B => ∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx B) a_1)
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #18 (by betaEtaReduce #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (subset a a_1) (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx a_1)
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #20 (by clausify Prop equality #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) False) (Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx a_1) True)
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #22 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #23 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #25 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) False) (Eq (in a_2 a → in a_2 a_1) True)
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (in a_2 a) False) (Eq (in a_2 a_1) True))
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #27 (by superposition #[26, 9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a (skS.0 0 a_1)) False) (Or (Eq (in a (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2)) True) (Eq False True))
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #105 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a (skS.0 0 a_1)) False) (Eq (in a (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2)) True)
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #106 (by superposition #[105, 22]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Or (Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_3)) True) (Eq False True)
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #2089 (by clausification #[106]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_3)) True
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #2090 (by superposition #[2089, 23]): Eq True False
% 11.91/12.11  Clause #2100 (by clausification #[2090]): False
% 11.91/12.11  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------