↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU579^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:24:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  299 (  18   ~;  24   |;   7   &; 215   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  31  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   9 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   0   ^;  64   !;   0   ?;  64   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    powersetI: $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    powersetE: $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    subsetI2: $o ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    subsetE: $o ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    esk1_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    esk2_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_33,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(powersetsubset,conjecture,
    ( powersetI
   => ( powersetE
     => ( subsetI2
       => ( subsetE
         => ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
              ( ( subset @ X1 @ X2 )
             => ( subset @ ( powerset @ X1 ) @ ( powerset @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p33oSvgEZV/E---3.1_109867.p',powersetsubset) ).

thf(powersetI,axiom,
    ( powersetI
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
           => ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) )
       => ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p33oSvgEZV/E---3.1_109867.p',powersetI) ).

thf(powersetE,axiom,
    ( powersetE
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X1 ) )
       => ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
         => ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p33oSvgEZV/E---3.1_109867.p',powersetE) ).

thf(subsetI2,axiom,
    ( subsetI2
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           => ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
       => ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p33oSvgEZV/E---3.1_109867.p',subsetI2) ).

thf(subsetE,axiom,
    ( subsetE
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
        ( ( subset @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
         => ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p33oSvgEZV/E---3.1_109867.p',subsetE) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( powersetI
     => ( powersetE
       => ( subsetI2
         => ( subsetE
           => ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
                ( ( subset @ X1 @ X2 )
               => ( subset @ ( powerset @ X1 ) @ ( powerset @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[powersetsubset]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X18: $i,X19: $i] :
          ( ! [X20: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X20 @ X19 )
             => ( in @ X20 @ X18 ) )
         => ( in @ X19 @ ( powerset @ X18 ) ) )
     => ( ! [X21: $i,X22: $i,X23: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X22 @ ( powerset @ X21 ) )
           => ( ( in @ X23 @ X22 )
             => ( in @ X23 @ X21 ) ) )
       => ( ! [X24: $i,X25: $i] :
              ( ! [X26: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X26 @ X24 )
                 => ( in @ X26 @ X25 ) )
             => ( subset @ X24 @ X25 ) )
         => ( ! [X27: $i,X28: $i,X29: $i] :
                ( ( subset @ X27 @ X28 )
               => ( ( in @ X29 @ X27 )
                 => ( in @ X29 @ X28 ) ) )
           => ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
                ( ( subset @ X1 @ X2 )
               => ( subset @ ( powerset @ X1 ) @ ( powerset @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,powersetI]),powersetE]),subsetI2]),subsetE]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X30: $i,X31: $i,X33: $i,X34: $i,X35: $i,X36: $i,X37: $i,X39: $i,X40: $i,X41: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X30 @ X31 ) @ X31 )
        | ( in @ X31 @ ( powerset @ X30 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X30 @ X31 ) @ X30 )
        | ( in @ X31 @ ( powerset @ X30 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X34 @ ( powerset @ X33 ) )
        | ~ ( in @ X35 @ X34 )
        | ( in @ X35 @ X33 ) )
      & ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X36 @ X37 ) @ X36 )
        | ( subset @ X36 @ X37 ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X36 @ X37 ) @ X37 )
        | ( subset @ X36 @ X37 ) )
      & ( ~ ( subset @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( in @ X41 @ X39 )
        | ( in @ X41 @ X40 ) )
      & ( subset @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
      & ~ ( subset @ ( powerset @ esk3_0 ) @ ( powerset @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      | ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( subset @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    subset @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ ( powerset @ X1 ) @ X2 )
      | ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X3 @ ( esk2_2 @ ( powerset @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
      | ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X1 @ esk4_0 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ ( esk2_2 @ ( powerset @ X2 ) @ X3 ) ) @ X2 )
      | ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ ( powerset @ X2 ) @ X3 ) @ ( powerset @ X1 ) )
      | ( subset @ ( powerset @ X2 ) @ X3 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ ( esk2_2 @ ( powerset @ esk3_0 ) @ X2 ) ) @ esk4_0 )
      | ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ ( powerset @ esk3_0 ) @ X2 ) @ ( powerset @ X1 ) )
      | ( subset @ ( powerset @ esk3_0 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ ( powerset @ esk3_0 ) @ X1 ) @ ( powerset @ esk4_0 ) )
      | ( subset @ ( powerset @ esk3_0 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( subset @ ( powerset @ esk3_0 ) @ ( powerset @ esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU579^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.24  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.24  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.24  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.24  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:54:11 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.24  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.28  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.29  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p33oSvgEZV/E---3.1_109867.p
% 0.16/0.31  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.16/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % lpo6_lambda_fix with pid 109890 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Result found by lpo6_lambda_fix
% 0.16/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/0.31  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.31  % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF21-SFFFMFNN
% 0.16/0.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % SubtermCWHack with pid 109894 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/0.31  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.31  % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF21-SFFFMFNN
% 0.16/0.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.31  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.31  
% 0.16/0.31  % Proof found!
% 0.16/0.31  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.31  % Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.16/0.31  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.16/0.31  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.16/0.31  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.16/0.31  % Processed clauses                    : 31
% 0.16/0.31  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.16/0.31  % ...remaining for further processing  : 26
% 0.16/0.31  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Generated clauses                    : 43
% 0.16/0.31  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 39
% 0.16/0.31  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Paramodulations                      : 43
% 0.16/0.31  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.16/0.31  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.31  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.31  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.31  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.31  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.31  % Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 0.16/0.31  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.16/0.31  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.31  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.16/0.31  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.16/0.31  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.16/0.31  % ...number of literals in the above   : 57
% 0.16/0.31  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 95
% 0.16/0.31  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.16/0.31  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.16/0.31  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.16/0.31  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.16/0.31  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.31  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2004
% 0.16/0.31  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 387
% 0.16/0.31  
% 0.16/0.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.31  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.31  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.31  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.31  % Maximum resident set size: 3584 pages
% 0.16/0.31  
% 0.16/0.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.31  % User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.31  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.31  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.16/0.31  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/0.31  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------