↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU584^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:01:58 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.13s 4.31s
% Output   : Proof 4.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SEU584^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 05:43:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.13/4.31  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.13/4.31  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq setunionI (∀ (A Xx B : Iota), in Xx B → in B A → in Xx (setunion A))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq binunion fun Xx Xy => setunion (setadjoin Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq upairset2IR (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xy (setadjoin Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset)))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (setunionI → upairset2IR → ∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion A B))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (setunionI → upairset2IR → ∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion A B)) False
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): Eq setunionI True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): Eq (upairset2IR → ∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion A B)) False
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): Eq upairset2IR True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): Eq (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion A B)) False
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion (skS.0 0 a) B))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion (skS.0 0 a) B)) False
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx (skS.0 1 a a_1) → in Xx (binunion (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx (skS.0 1 a a_1) → in Xx (binunion (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1))) False
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.13/4.31    Eq (Not (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (binunion (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.13/4.31    Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (binunion (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1))) False
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #16 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (binunion (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1))) False
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #17 (by clausification #[0]): Eq setunionI (∀ (A Xx B : Iota), in Xx B → in B A → in Xx (setunion A))
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #18 (by forward demodulation #[17, 5]): Eq True (∀ (A Xx B : Iota), in Xx B → in B A → in Xx (setunion A))
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xx B : Iota), in Xx B → in B a → in Xx (setunion a)) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), in a B → in B a_1 → in a (setunion a_1)) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in a a_1 → in a_1 a_2 → in a (setunion a_2)) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a a_1) False) (Eq (in a_1 a_2 → in a (setunion a_2)) True)
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (in a_1 a_2) False) (Eq (in a (setunion a_2)) True))
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #24 (by superposition #[23, 15]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 4.13/4.31    Or (Eq (in (skS.0 1 a a_1) a_2) False) (Or (Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_3) (setunion a_2)) True) (Eq False True))
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #25 (by clausification #[2]): Eq upairset2IR (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xy (setadjoin Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset)))
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #26 (by forward demodulation #[25, 7]): Eq True (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), in Xy (setadjoin Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset)))
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), in Xy (setadjoin a (setadjoin Xy emptyset))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (in a (setadjoin a_1 (setadjoin a emptyset))) True
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #30 (by clausification #[1]): Eq binunion fun Xx Xy => setunion (setadjoin Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset))
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #31 (by argument congruence #[30]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (binunion a) ((fun Xx Xy => setunion (setadjoin Xx (setadjoin Xy emptyset))) a)
% 4.13/4.31  Clause #33 (by betaEtaReduce #[31]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (binunion a) fun Xy => setunion (setadjoin a (setadjoin Xy emptyset))
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #34 (by argument congruence #[33]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (binunion a a_1) ((fun Xy => setunion (setadjoin a (setadjoin Xy emptyset))) a_1)
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #40 (by betaEtaReduce #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (binunion a a_1) (setunion (setadjoin a (setadjoin a_1 emptyset)))
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #55 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Or (Eq (in (skS.0 1 a a_1) a_2) False) (Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_3) (setunion a_2)) True)
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #56 (by superposition #[55, 28]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 4.17/4.32    Or (Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (setunion (setadjoin a_3 (setadjoin (skS.0 1 a a_1) emptyset)))) True) (Eq False True)
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #194 (by clausification #[56]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 4.17/4.32    Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (setunion (setadjoin a_3 (setadjoin (skS.0 1 a a_1) emptyset)))) True
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #195 (by forward demodulation #[194, 40]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (binunion a_3 (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #196 (by superposition #[195, 16]): Eq True False
% 4.17/4.32  Clause #202 (by clausification #[196]): False
% 4.17/4.32  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------