↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU588^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:01:59 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.47s 4.63s
% Output   : Proof 4.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SEU588^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.03/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 04:41:08 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.47/4.63  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.47/4.63  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq subsetI2 (∀ (A B : Iota), (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx A → in Xx B) → subset A B)) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq binunionIR (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion A B))) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (subsetI2 → binunionIR → ∀ (A B : Iota), subset B (binunion A B))) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #3 (by clausification #[0]): Eq subsetI2 (∀ (A B : Iota), (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx A → in Xx B) → subset A B)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #22 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (subsetI2 → binunionIR → ∀ (A B : Iota), subset B (binunion A B)) False
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): Eq subsetI2 True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #24 (by clausification #[22]): Eq (binunionIR → ∀ (A B : Iota), subset B (binunion A B)) False
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #25 (by backward demodulation #[23, 3]): Eq True (∀ (A B : Iota), (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx A → in Xx B) → subset A B)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #28 (by clausification #[1]): Eq binunionIR (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion A B))
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #32 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx B) → subset a B) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #33 (by clausification #[32]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq ((∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx a_1) → subset a a_1) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #34 (by clausification #[33]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx a_1) False) (Eq (subset a a_1) True)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.47/4.63    Or (Eq (subset a a_1) True) (Eq (Not (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) a → in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) a_1)) True)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #36 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) True) (Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) a → in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) a_1) False)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) True) (Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) a) True)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #38 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) True) (Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) a_1) False)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #39 (by clausification #[24]): Eq binunionIR True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #40 (by clausification #[24]): Eq (∀ (A B : Iota), subset B (binunion A B)) False
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #41 (by backward demodulation #[39, 28]): Eq True (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion A B))
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #42 (by clausification #[40]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B : Iota), subset B (binunion (skS.0 4 a) B))) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #43 (by clausification #[42]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), subset B (binunion (skS.0 4 a) B)) False
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #44 (by clausification #[43]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (subset (skS.0 5 a a_1) (binunion (skS.0 4 a) (skS.0 5 a a_1)))) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #45 (by clausification #[44]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (subset (skS.0 5 a a_1) (binunion (skS.0 4 a) (skS.0 5 a a_1))) False
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #46 (by clausification #[41]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B Xx : Iota), in Xx B → in Xx (binunion a B)) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #47 (by clausification #[46]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx a → in Xx (binunion a_1 a)) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #48 (by clausification #[47]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in a a_1 → in a (binunion a_2 a_1)) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #49 (by clausification #[48]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a a_1) False) (Eq (in a (binunion a_2 a_1)) True)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #50 (by superposition #[49, 37]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 4.47/4.63    Or (Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) (binunion a_3 a)) True) (Or (Eq (subset a a_1) True) (Eq False True))
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #74 (by clausification #[50]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Or (Eq (in (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2) (binunion a_3 a)) True) (Eq (subset a a_1) True)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #75 (by superposition #[74, 38]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a (binunion a_1 a)) True) (Or (Eq (subset a (binunion a_1 a)) True) (Eq True False))
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #77 (by clausification #[75]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a (binunion a_1 a)) True) (Eq (subset a (binunion a_1 a)) True)
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #78 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[77]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (subset a (binunion a_1 a)) True
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #79 (by superposition #[78, 45]): Eq True False
% 4.47/4.63  Clause #80 (by clausification #[79]): False
% 4.47/4.63  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------