%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU592^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:24:38 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 3 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 161 ( 8 ~; 7 |; 3 &; 128 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 16 ^; 38 !; 0 ?; 54 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
subsetI2: $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
binintersect: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
binintersectEL: $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
esk1_2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_30,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_31,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(binintersect,axiom,
( binintersect
= ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [X3: $i] : ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L3KQ8jmGcS/E---3.1_4036118.p',binintersect) ).
thf(binintersectLsub,conjecture,
( subsetI2
=> ( binintersectEL
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( subset @ ( binintersect @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L3KQ8jmGcS/E---3.1_4036118.p',binintersectLsub) ).
thf(binintersectEL,axiom,
( binintersectEL
<=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ ( binintersect @ X1 @ X2 ) )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L3KQ8jmGcS/E---3.1_4036118.p',binintersectEL) ).
thf(subsetI2,axiom,
( subsetI2
<=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L3KQ8jmGcS/E---3.1_4036118.p',subsetI2) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
( binintersect
= ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
( dsetconstr @ Z0
@ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( in @ Z2 @ Z1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[binintersect]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( subsetI2
=> ( binintersectEL
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( subset @ ( binintersect @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[binintersectLsub]) ).
thf(c_0_6,axiom,
( binintersectEL
= ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3
@ ( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X2 ) ) )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[binintersectEL,c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X12: $i,X13: $i] :
( ! [X14: $i] :
( ( in @ X14 @ X12 )
=> ( in @ X14 @ X13 ) )
=> ( subset @ X12 @ X13 ) )
=> ( ! [X15: $i,X16: $i,X17: $i] :
( ( in @ X17
@ ( dsetconstr @ X15
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X16 ) ) )
=> ( in @ X17 @ X15 ) )
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( subset
@ ( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X2 ) )
@ X1 ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,subsetI2]),c_0_4]),c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: $i,X19: $i,X21: $i,X22: $i,X23: $i] :
( ( ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19 ) @ X18 )
| ( subset @ X18 @ X19 ) )
& ( ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19 ) @ X19 )
| ( subset @ X18 @ X19 ) )
& ( ~ ( in @ X23
@ ( dsetconstr @ X21
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X22 ) ) )
| ( in @ X23 @ X21 ) )
& ~ ( subset
@ ( dsetconstr @ esk2_0
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ esk3_0 ) )
@ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( in @ X1
@ ( dsetconstr @ X2
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
| ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( subset @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( in
@ ( esk1_2
@ ( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X2 ) )
@ X3 )
@ X1 )
| ( subset
@ ( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X2 ) )
@ X3 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ( subset
@ ( dsetconstr @ esk2_0
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ esk3_0 ) )
@ esk2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( subset
@ ( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( in @ Z0 @ X2 ) )
@ X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU592^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:53:45 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L3KQ8jmGcS/E---3.1_4036118.p
% 0.26/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.26/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNSFN.
% 0.26/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 4036134 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda
% 0.26/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNSFN.
% 0.26/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.26 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.26 % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF22-MSFFMFNN
% 0.26/0.26 % partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF22-SSFFMFNN
% 0.26/0.26 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4036135 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNSFN.
% 0.26/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.26 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.26 % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF22-MSFFMFNN
% 0.26/0.26 % partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF22-SSFFMFNN
% 0.26/0.26 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/0.26
% 0.26/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.26/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.26/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.26/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.26/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.26/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.26/0.26 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.26/0.26 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.26/0.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.26/0.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.26/0.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.26/0.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.26/0.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.26/0.26 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 751
% 0.26/0.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 188
% 0.26/0.26
% 0.26/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.26 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.26 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.26/0.26 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.26/0.26
% 0.26/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.26 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.26 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.26 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.26/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------