↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SEU601^2 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n111.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32286.75MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 17 13:32:34 EDT 2014

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s
% Output   : Proof 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % Problem  : SEU601^2 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % Computer : n111.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% % Memory   : 32286.75MB
% % OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% % CPULimit : 300
% % DateTime : Thu Jul 17 10:51:31 CDT 2014
% % CPUTime  : 0.42 
% Python 2.7.5
% Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2381248>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2381b48>) of role type named in_type
% Using role type
% Declaring in:(fofType->(fofType->Prop))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x219f440>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x23817a0>) of role type named dsetconstr_type
% Using role type
% Declaring dsetconstr:(fofType->((fofType->Prop)->fofType))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2381950>, <kernel.Sort object at 0x2065f38>) of role type named dsetconstrI_type
% Using role type
% Declaring dsetconstrI:Prop
% FOF formula (((eq Prop) dsetconstrI) (forall (A:fofType) (Xphi:(fofType->Prop)) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((Xphi Xx)->((in Xx) ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xy:fofType)=> (Xphi Xy)))))))) of role definition named dsetconstrI
% A new definition: (((eq Prop) dsetconstrI) (forall (A:fofType) (Xphi:(fofType->Prop)) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((Xphi Xx)->((in Xx) ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xy:fofType)=> (Xphi Xy))))))))
% Defined: dsetconstrI:=(forall (A:fofType) (Xphi:(fofType->Prop)) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((Xphi Xx)->((in Xx) ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xy:fofType)=> (Xphi Xy)))))))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x231a560>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2381cb0>) of role type named setminus_type
% Using role type
% Declaring setminus:(fofType->(fofType->fofType))
% FOF formula (((eq (fofType->(fofType->fofType))) setminus) (fun (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xx:fofType)=> (((in Xx) B)->False))))) of role definition named setminus
% A new definition: (((eq (fofType->(fofType->fofType))) setminus) (fun (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xx:fofType)=> (((in Xx) B)->False)))))
% Defined: setminus:=(fun (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xx:fofType)=> (((in Xx) B)->False))))
% FOF formula (dsetconstrI->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B)))))) of role conjecture named setminusI
% Conjecture to prove = (dsetconstrI->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B)))))):Prop
% Parameter fofType_DUMMY:fofType.
% We need to prove ['(dsetconstrI->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))))))']
% Parameter fofType:Type.
% Parameter in:(fofType->(fofType->Prop)).
% Parameter dsetconstr:(fofType->((fofType->Prop)->fofType)).
% Definition dsetconstrI:=(forall (A:fofType) (Xphi:(fofType->Prop)) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((Xphi Xx)->((in Xx) ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xy:fofType)=> (Xphi Xy))))))):Prop.
% Definition setminus:=(fun (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xx:fofType)=> (((in Xx) B)->False)))):(fofType->(fofType->fofType)).
% Trying to prove (dsetconstrI->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))))))
% Found x00:=(x0 (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B)))):(forall (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((not ((in Xx) B))->((in Xx) ((dsetconstr A) (fun (Xy:fofType)=> (not ((in Xy) B))))))))
% Found (x0 (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B)))) as proof of (forall (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((not ((in Xx) B))->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B)))))
% Found ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B)))) as proof of (forall (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((not ((in Xx) B))->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B)))))
% Found (fun (B:fofType)=> ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B))))) as proof of (forall (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((not ((in Xx) B))->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B)))))
% Found (fun (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B))))) as proof of (forall (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((not ((in Xx) B))->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B)))))
% Found (fun (x:dsetconstrI) (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B))))) as proof of (forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((not ((in Xx) B))->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B)))))
% Found (fun (x:dsetconstrI) (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B))))) as proof of (dsetconstrI->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((not ((in Xx) B))->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))))))
% Found (fun (x:dsetconstrI) (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B))))) as proof of (dsetconstrI->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), (((in Xx) A)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))))))
% Got proof (fun (x:dsetconstrI) (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B)))))
% Time elapsed = 0.094708s
% node=14 cost=-126.000000 depth=6
% ::::::::::::::::::::::
% % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% (fun (x:dsetconstrI) (A:fofType) (B:fofType)=> ((x A) (fun (x3:fofType)=> (not ((in x3) B)))))
% % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% EOF
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------