↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SEU606^2 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32286.75MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 17 13:32:35 EDT 2014

% Result   : Theorem 0.50s
% Output   : Proof 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % Problem  : SEU606^2 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% % Memory   : 32286.75MB
% % OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% % CPULimit : 300
% % DateTime : Thu Jul 17 10:52:31 CDT 2014
% % CPUTime  : 0.50 
% Python 2.7.5
% Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x12ddcb0>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x12dd830>) of role type named in_type
% Using role type
% Declaring in:(fofType->(fofType->Prop))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x12db3f8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x12dd830>) of role type named setminus_type
% Using role type
% Declaring setminus:(fofType->(fofType->fofType))
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x12db3f8>, <kernel.Sort object at 0xfc0bd8>) of role type named setminusERneg_type
% Using role type
% Declaring setminusERneg:Prop
% FOF formula (((eq Prop) setminusERneg) (forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->(((in Xx) A)->((in Xx) B))))) of role definition named setminusERneg
% A new definition: (((eq Prop) setminusERneg) (forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->(((in Xx) A)->((in Xx) B)))))
% Defined: setminusERneg:=(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->(((in Xx) A)->((in Xx) B))))
% FOF formula (setminusERneg->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False))))) of role conjecture named setminusELneg
% Conjecture to prove = (setminusERneg->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False))))):Prop
% Parameter fofType_DUMMY:fofType.
% We need to prove ['(setminusERneg->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False)))))']
% Parameter fofType:Type.
% Parameter in:(fofType->(fofType->Prop)).
% Parameter setminus:(fofType->(fofType->fofType)).
% Definition setminusERneg:=(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->(((in Xx) A)->((in Xx) B)))):Prop.
% Trying to prove (setminusERneg->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False)))))
% Found x30000:=(x3000 x2):((in Xx) B)
% Found (x3000 x2) as proof of ((in Xx) B)
% Found ((x300 x0) x2) as proof of ((in Xx) B)
% Found (((x30 A) x0) x2) as proof of ((in Xx) B)
% Found ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x3 A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2) as proof of ((in Xx) B)
% Found ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2) as proof of ((in Xx) B)
% Found ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2) as proof of ((in Xx) B)
% Found (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2)) as proof of False
% Found (fun (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of False
% Found (fun (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of (((in Xx) A)->False)
% Found (fun (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of ((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False))
% Found (fun (Xx:fofType) (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False)))
% Found (fun (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType) (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of (forall (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False))))
% Found (fun (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType) (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of (forall (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False))))
% Found (fun (x:setminusERneg) (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType) (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of (forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False))))
% Found (fun (x:setminusERneg) (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType) (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2))) as proof of (setminusERneg->(forall (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType), ((((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)->((((in Xx) B)->False)->(((in Xx) A)->False)))))
% Got proof (fun (x:setminusERneg) (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType) (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2)))
% Time elapsed = 0.182636s
% node=47 cost=537.000000 depth=14
% ::::::::::::::::::::::
% % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% (fun (x:setminusERneg) (A:fofType) (B:fofType) (Xx:fofType) (x0:(((in Xx) ((setminus A) B))->False)) (x1:(((in Xx) B)->False)) (x2:((in Xx) A))=> (x1 ((((fun (A0:fofType)=> (((fun (A0:fofType)=> ((x A0) B)) A0) Xx)) A) x0) x2)))
% % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% EOF
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------