↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU607^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.49s 1.23s
% Output   : Refutation 1.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  176 (  39 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  239 (  20   ~;   3   |;   6   &; 173   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   6 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  15  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (  18   ^;  36   !;   6   ?;  60   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    setminus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(f40,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f26,f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK0 @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false = $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f24,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( setminus @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( setminusEL = $true )
    & ( ( in @ sK0 @ sK1 )
     != $true )
    & ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( setminus @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f10,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X2 ) )
          = $true ) )
   => ( ( ( in @ sK0 @ sK1 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( setminus @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( setminusEL = $true )
    & ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X2 ) )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( ( setminusEL = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
           != $true )
         => ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ( ( setminusEL = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
           != $true )
         => ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( setminusEL
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
         => ~ ( in @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setminusEL
     => ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( setminusEL
   => ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
       => ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FFeJN88kP1/DTF2THF_13138.p',setminusILneg) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X1 ) )
       => ( in @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
           => ( in @ X2 @ Y0 ) )
        @ X3 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
           => ( in @ X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y1 @ X1 ) )
               => ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y1 @ X1 ) )
               => ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                   => ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                 => ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f16,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    setminusEL = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( setminusEL
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                 => ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( setminusEL
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                 => ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( setminusEL
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
         => ( in @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( setminusEL
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         => ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FFeJN88kP1/DTF2THF_13138.p',setminusEL) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK0 @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(fool_paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK0 @ sK1 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEU607^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:28:27 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.30/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.30/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  % File     : SEU607^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.30/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.30/0.46  % Problem  : Preliminary Notions - Operations on Sets - Set Difference
% 0.30/0.46  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.30/0.46  % English  : (! A:i.! B:i.! x:i.~(in x A) -> ~(in x (setminus A B)))
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.30/0.46  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.30/0.46  % Names    : ZFC109l [Bro08]
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.30/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.30/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   1 unt;   3 typ;   1 def)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    7 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  12   @)
% 0.30/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^;   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)
% 0.30/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=462
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  thf(in_type,type,
% 0.30/0.46      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(setminus_type,type,
% 0.30/0.46      setminus: $i > $i > $i ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(setminusEL_type,type,
% 0.30/0.46      setminusEL: $o ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(setminusEL,definition,
% 0.30/0.46      ( setminusEL
% 0.30/0.46      = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 0.30/0.46            ( ( in @ Xx @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) )
% 0.30/0.46           => ( in @ Xx @ A ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(setminusILneg,conjecture,
% 0.30/0.46      ( setminusEL
% 0.30/0.46     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 0.30/0.46          ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.30/0.46         => ~ ( in @ Xx @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.21  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.49/1.21  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.49/1.21  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:28:28 EST 2026
% 1.49/1.21  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.49/1.21  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.49/1.21  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.49/1.21  
% 1.49/1.21  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FFeJN88kP1/DTF2DTF13138.p
% See solution above
% 1.49/1.21  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.21  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.49/1.22  thf(in_type,type,
% 1.49/1.22      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.49/1.22  
% 1.49/1.22  thf(setminus_type,type,
% 1.49/1.22      setminus: $i > $i > $i ).
% 1.49/1.22  
% 1.49/1.22  thf(setminusEL_type,type,
% 1.49/1.22      setminusEL: $o ).
% 1.49/1.22  
% 1.49/1.22  thf(setminusEL,definition,
% 1.49/1.22      ( setminusEL
% 1.49/1.22      = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 1.49/1.22            ( ( in @ Xx @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) )
% 1.49/1.22           => ( in @ Xx @ A ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.22  
% 1.49/1.22  thf(setminusILneg,conjecture,
% 1.49/1.22      ( setminusEL
% 1.49/1.22     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 1.49/1.22          ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.49/1.22         => ~ ( in @ Xx @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.22  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_13138 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)First to succeed.
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.49/1.23  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_13138
% 1.49/1.23  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_13138
% 1.49/1.23  thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(func_def_1, type, setminus: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    $false),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ($false = $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f26,f36])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ((in @ sK0 @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ((in @ sK0 @ sK1) = $true) | ($false = $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f24,f13])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ((in @ sK0 @ (setminus @ sK1 @ sK2)) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    (setminusEL = $true) & (((in @ sK0 @ sK1) != $true) & ((in @ sK0 @ (setminus @ sK1 @ sK2)) = $true))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f10,f11])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X0 @ X1) != $true) & ((in @ X0 @ (setminus @ X1 @ X2)) = $true)) => (((in @ sK0 @ sK1) != $true) & ((in @ sK0 @ (setminus @ sK1 @ sK2)) = $true))),
% 1.49/1.23    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    (setminusEL = $true) & ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X0 @ X1) != $true) & ((in @ X0 @ (setminus @ X1 @ X2)) = $true))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ~((setminusEL = $true) => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X0 @ X1) != $true) => ((in @ X0 @ (setminus @ X1 @ X2)) != $true)))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ~((setminusEL = $true) => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (~((in @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ~((in @ X0 @ (setminus @ X1 @ X2)) = $true)))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ~(setminusEL => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (~(in @ X0 @ X1) => ~(in @ X0 @ (setminus @ X1 @ X2))))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.23    ~(setminusEL => ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (~(in @ X2 @ X0) => ~(in @ X2 @ (setminus @ X0 @ X1))))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.23    setminusEL => ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (~(in @ X2 @ X0) => ~(in @ X2 @ (setminus @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 1.49/1.23    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FFeJN88kP1/DTF2THF_13138.p',setminusILneg)).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ (setminus @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | ((in @ X2 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((in @ X2 @ (setminus @ X3 @ X1)) => (in @ X2 @ X3)) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ X2 @ (setminus @ Y0 @ X1)) => (in @ X2 @ Y0))) @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ X2 @ (setminus @ Y0 @ X1)) => (in @ X2 @ Y0)))) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ (setminus @ Y1 @ X1)) => (in @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X2))) )),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ (setminus @ Y1 @ X1)) => (in @ Y0 @ Y1)))))) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (setminus @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (in @ Y1 @ Y2))))))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (setminus @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (in @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f16,f15])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    (setminusEL = $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    (setminusEL = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (setminus @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (in @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    (setminusEL = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (setminus @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (in @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    (setminusEL = ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((in @ X1 @ (setminus @ X0 @ X2)) => (in @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.49/1.23    (setminusEL = ! [X0 : $i,X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ (setminus @ X0 @ X1)) => (in @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 1.49/1.23    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FFeJN88kP1/DTF2THF_13138.p',setminusEL)).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ((in @ sK0 @ sK1) = $false)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ((in @ sK0 @ sK1) = $false) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(fool_paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.49/1.23  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.49/1.23    ((in @ sK0 @ sK1) != $true)),
% 1.49/1.23    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.23  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_13138
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.49/1.23  
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.23  % (13356)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.23  % (13354)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------