%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Duper---1.0 % Problem : SEU607^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : duper %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Oct 3 08:02:01 PM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 3.62s 3.78s % Output : Proof 3.62s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU607^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : duper %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Oct 3 06:47:23 EDT 2025 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 3.62/3.78 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p % 3.62/3.78 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p % 3.62/3.78 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq setminusEL (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx (setminus A B) → in Xx A)) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (setminusEL → ∀ (A B Xx : Iota), Not (in Xx A) → Not (in Xx (setminus A B)))) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #2 (by clausification #[0]): Eq setminusEL (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx (setminus A B) → in Xx A) % 3.62/3.78 Clause #18 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (setminusEL → ∀ (A B Xx : Iota), Not (in Xx A) → Not (in Xx (setminus A B))) False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): Eq setminusEL True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #20 (by clausification #[18]): Eq (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), Not (in Xx A) → Not (in Xx (setminus A B))) False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #21 (by backward demodulation #[19, 2]): Eq True (∀ (A B Xx : Iota), in Xx (setminus A B) → in Xx A) % 3.62/3.78 Clause #25 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B Xx : Iota), in Xx (setminus a B) → in Xx a) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), in Xx (setminus a a_1) → in Xx a) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in a (setminus a_1 a_2) → in a a_1) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (in a (setminus a_1 a_2)) False) (Eq (in a a_1) True) % 3.62/3.78 Clause #29 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B Xx : Iota), Not (in Xx (skS.0 3 a)) → Not (in Xx (setminus (skS.0 3 a) B)))) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #30 (by clausification #[29]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B Xx : Iota), Not (in Xx (skS.0 3 a)) → Not (in Xx (setminus (skS.0 3 a) B))) False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #31 (by clausification #[30]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), % 3.62/3.78 Eq (Not (∀ (Xx : Iota), Not (in Xx (skS.0 3 a)) → Not (in Xx (setminus (skS.0 3 a) (skS.0 4 a a_1))))) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #32 (by clausification #[31]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), Not (in Xx (skS.0 3 a)) → Not (in Xx (setminus (skS.0 3 a) (skS.0 4 a a_1)))) False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #33 (by clausification #[32]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), % 3.62/3.78 Eq % 3.62/3.78 (Not % 3.62/3.78 (Not (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a)) → Not (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (setminus (skS.0 3 a) (skS.0 4 a a_1))))) % 3.62/3.78 True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #34 (by clausification #[33]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), % 3.62/3.78 Eq (Not (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a)) → Not (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (setminus (skS.0 3 a) (skS.0 4 a a_1)))) % 3.62/3.78 False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Not (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a))) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #36 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Not (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (setminus (skS.0 3 a) (skS.0 4 a a_1)))) False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #37 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a)) False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #38 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (setminus (skS.0 3 a) (skS.0 4 a a_1))) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #39 (by superposition #[38, 28]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a)) True) % 3.62/3.78 Clause #40 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 5 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 3 a)) True % 3.62/3.78 Clause #41 (by superposition #[40, 37]): Eq True False % 3.62/3.78 Clause #42 (by clausification #[41]): False % 3.62/3.78 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------