↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU611^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.58s 1.39s
% Output   : Refutation 1.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   97 (  22 unt;   0 typ;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       : 1015 ( 272 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (  10 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1020 ( 147   ~; 138   |;  57   &; 602   @)
%                                         (  12 <=>;  64  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   28 (  28   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   29 (  26 usr;  21 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  208 (  48   ^; 119   !;  41   ?; 208   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    binunion: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    symdiff: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    sK6: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    sK12: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_30,type,
    ph14: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f128,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f87,f88,f89,f106,f116,f119,f122,f126]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( spl13_3
    | ~ spl13_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f125]) ).

thf(f125,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl13_3
    | ~ spl13_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f124]) ).

thf(f124,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | spl13_3
    | ~ spl13_5 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f123,f105]) ).

thf(f105,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl13_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f103]) ).

thf(f103,definition,
    ( spl13_5
  <=> ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f123,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | spl13_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f109,f85]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | spl13_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f84]) ).

thf(f84,definition,
    ( spl13_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f108]) ).

thf(f108,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f71,f97]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ sK1 @ ( binunion @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f90]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ ( binunion @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f73,f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK1
      @ ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ sK2 @ sK0 )
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ sK2 )
            | ~ ( in @ Y0 @ sK0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f58]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK1
      @ ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
            ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ Y0 @ Y1 )
            @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                ( ~ ( in @ Y2 @ Y0 )
                | ~ ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
        @ sK2
        @ sK0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f41,f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( symdiff
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ Y0 @ Y1 )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
              ( ~ ( in @ Y2 @ Y0 )
              | ~ ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( symdiff
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ Y0 @ Y1 )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
              ( ~ ( in @ Y2 @ Y0 )
              | ~ ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X1 )
          @ ^ [X2: $i] :
              ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
              | ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
    = symdiff ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X4: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X4 )
          @ ^ [X2: $i] :
              ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X4 )
              | ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
    = symdiff ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',symdiff) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ sK1 @ ( symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
    & ( binunionE = $true )
    & ( $true != sK3 )
    & ( ( $true
        = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true = sK3 ) )
    & ( ( $true
       != ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( $true = sK3 )
      | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
        = $true ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ ( symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( dsetconstrER = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f20,f26,f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ? [X3: $o] :
            ( ( $true != X3 )
            & ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                = $true )
              | ( $true
               != ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
              | ( $true = X3 ) )
            & ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
               != $true )
              | ( $true = X3 )
              | ( $true
                = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
   => ( ? [X3: $o] :
          ( ( $true != X3 )
          & ( ( $true
              = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
            | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
             != $true )
            | ( $true = X3 ) )
          & ( ( $true
             != ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
            | ( $true = X3 )
            | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
              = $true ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( in @ sK1 @ ( symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ? [X3: $o] :
        ( ( $true != X3 )
        & ( ( $true
            = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
          | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true = X3 ) )
        & ( ( $true
           != ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
          | ( $true = X3 )
          | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
            = $true ) ) )
   => ( ( $true != sK3 )
      & ( ( $true
          = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
        | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
         != $true )
        | ( $true = sK3 ) )
      & ( ( $true
         != ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
        | ( $true = sK3 )
        | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
          = $true ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
    & ( binunionE = $true )
    & ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ? [X3: $o] :
            ( ( $true != X3 )
            & ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                = $true )
              | ( $true
               != ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
              | ( $true = X3 ) )
            & ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
               != $true )
              | ( $true = X3 )
              | ( $true
                = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
    & ( dsetconstrER = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ? [X3: $o] :
            ( ( $true != X3 )
            & ( ( $true = X3 )
              | ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
               != $true )
              | ( $true
                = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
            & ( ( $true = X3 )
              | ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                = $true )
              | ( $true
               != ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
    & ( binunionE = $true )
    & ( dsetconstrER = $true )
    & ( dsetconstrEL = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ~ ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
     => ( ( dsetconstrER = $true )
       => ( ( binunionE = $true )
         => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) ) )
             => ! [X3: $o] :
                  ( ( ( $true
                      = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                   => ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                       != $true )
                     => ( $true = X3 ) ) )
                 => ( ( ( $true
                       != ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                     => ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                          = $true )
                       => ( $true = X3 ) ) )
                   => ( $true = X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ~ ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
     => ( ( dsetconstrER = $true )
       => ( ( binunionE = $true )
         => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) ) )
             => ! [X3: $o] :
                  ( ( ( $true
                      = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                   => ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                       != $true )
                     => ( $true = X3 ) ) )
                 => ( ( ( $true
                       != ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                     => ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                          = $true )
                       => ( $true = X3 ) ) )
                   => ( $true = X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ~ ( dsetconstrEL
     => ( dsetconstrER
       => ( binunionE
         => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) )
             => ! [X3: $o] :
                  ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
                   => ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                     => X3 ) )
                 => ( ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
                     => ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                       => X3 ) )
                   => X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( dsetconstrEL
     => ( dsetconstrER
       => ( binunionE
         => ! [X4: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X0 @ X4 ) )
             => ! [X1: $o] :
                  ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                   => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X4 )
                     => X1 ) )
                 => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                     => ( ( in @ X2 @ X4 )
                       => X1 ) )
                   => X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,conjecture,
    ( dsetconstrEL
   => ( dsetconstrER
     => ( binunionE
       => ! [X4: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X0 @ X4 ) )
           => ! [X1: $o] :
                ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                 => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X4 )
                   => X1 ) )
               => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                   => ( ( in @ X2 @ X4 )
                     => X1 ) )
                 => X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',symdiffE) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X4 @ ( dsetconstr @ X3 @ X5 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f72]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( in @ X4
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X3
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f61]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( in @ X4
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X3
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f47,f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    dsetconstrEL = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( in @ X4
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X3
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != $true )
      | ( dsetconstrEL != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
      | ( ( ( in @ sK5 @ sK4 )
         != $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ sK5
            @ ( dsetconstr @ sK4
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK6 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          | ( ( in @ X4
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X3
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) )
           != $true ) )
      | ( dsetconstrEL != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f29,f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ( in @ sK5 @ sK4 )
       != $true )
      & ( $true
        = ( in @ sK5
          @ ( dsetconstr @ sK4
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK6 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( in @ X1
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          | ( ( in @ X4
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X3
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) )
           != $true ) )
      | ( dsetconstrEL != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( in @ X1
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( in @ X1
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( dsetconstrEL != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( dsetconstrEL = $true )
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( in @ X1
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ X1
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
       => ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) )
  <=> ( dsetconstrEL = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( in @ X1
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
            @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
       => ( in @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      = dsetconstrEL ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
            @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
       => ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) )
      = dsetconstrEL ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',dsetconstrEL) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X5 @ ( binunion @ X4 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( ( in @ X5 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( in @ X5 @ X4 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f65]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( in @ X5 @ X4 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( in @ X5 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( in @ X5 @ ( binunion @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f51,f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    binunionE = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X5 @ X4 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( in @ X5 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( in @ X5 @ ( binunion @ X4 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( binunionE != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( ( binunionE = $true )
      | ( ( $true
         != ( in @ sK9 @ sK8 ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( in @ sK9 @ sK7 ) )
        & ( ( in @ sK9 @ ( binunion @ sK8 @ sK7 ) )
          = $true ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X5 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( in @ X5 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( in @ X5 @ ( binunion @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ) )
      | ( binunionE != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7,sK8,sK9])],[f33,f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
       != ( in @ sK9 @ sK8 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( in @ sK9 @ sK7 ) )
      & ( ( in @ sK9 @ ( binunion @ sK8 @ sK7 ) )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( binunionE = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X5 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( in @ X5 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( in @ X5 @ ( binunion @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ) )
      | ( binunionE != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( ( binunionE = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) )
      | ( binunionE != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( binunionE = $true )
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( binunionE = $true )
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( binunionE = $true )
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
       => ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
            = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
          | ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
      = binunionE ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X4: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X4 ) )
       => ( ( in @ X2 @ X4 )
          | ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) ) )
      = binunionE ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',binunionE) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    ( ~ spl13_2
    | ~ spl13_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f121]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl13_2
    | ~ spl13_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f120]) ).

thf(f120,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl13_2
    | ~ spl13_5 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f81,f105]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl13_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f80]) ).

thf(f80,definition,
    ( spl13_2
  <=> ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f119,plain,
    ( spl13_2
    | ~ spl13_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f118,f99,f80]) ).

thf(f99,definition,
    ( spl13_4
  <=> ( $false
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl13_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f117]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl13_4 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f109,f101]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl13_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f99]) ).

thf(f116,plain,
    ( ~ spl13_3
    | ~ spl13_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f115]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl13_3
    | ~ spl13_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f114]) ).

thf(f114,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl13_3
    | ~ spl13_4 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f86,f101]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl13_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f84]) ).

thf(f106,plain,
    ( spl13_4
    | spl13_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f96,f103,f99]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f95]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f94]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f93]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ~ ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      | ~ ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f92]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ sK2 )
          | ~ ( in @ Y0 @ sK0 ) )
      @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f91]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ sK2 )
            | ~ ( in @ Y0 @ sK0 ) )
        @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f70,f74]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X3 @ ( dsetconstr @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
      | ( ( X5 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f69]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X3
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X4
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( X5 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f68]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( X5 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( in @ X3
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X4
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f55,f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    dsetconstrER = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X5 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( in @ X3
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X4
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( dsetconstrER != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( ( dsetconstrER = $true )
      | ( ( $true
         != ( sK12 @ sK10 ) )
        & ( ( in @ sK10
            @ ( dsetconstr @ sK11
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK12 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = $true ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X5 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( in @ X3
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X4
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( dsetconstrER != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK10,sK11,sK12])],[f37,f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( X2 @ X0 ) )
        & ( ( in @ X0
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = $true ) )
   => ( ( $true
       != ( sK12 @ sK10 ) )
      & ( ( in @ sK10
          @ ( dsetconstr @ sK11
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK12 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( ( dsetconstrER = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X2 @ X0 ) )
          & ( ( in @ X0
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
            = $true ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X5 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( in @ X3
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X4
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X5 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( dsetconstrER != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( dsetconstrER = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X2 @ X0 ) )
          & ( ( in @ X0
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
            = $true ) ) )
    & ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( X2 @ X0 ) )
          | ( ( in @ X0
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
           != $true ) )
      | ( dsetconstrER != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( dsetconstrER = $true )
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( X2 @ X0 ) )
        | ( ( in @ X0
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( in @ X0
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = $true )
       => ( $true
          = ( X2 @ X0 ) ) )
  <=> ( dsetconstrER = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( dsetconstrER
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( in @ X0
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
              @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
         => ( X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ( dsetconstrER
    = ( ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ( in @ X2
            @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
              @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
         => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',dsetconstrER) ).

thf(f89,plain,
    ~ spl13_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f44,f76]) ).

thf(f76,definition,
    ( spl13_1
  <=> ( $true = sK3 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    $true != sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( spl13_1
    | spl13_2
    | ~ spl13_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f42,f84,f80,f76]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true = sK3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( spl13_1
    | ~ spl13_2
    | spl13_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f43,f84,f80,f76]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
     != $true )
    | ( $true = sK3 )
    | ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEU611^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:28:59 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.20/0.44  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.20/0.44  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.20/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.44  % File     : SEU611^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.20/0.44  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.20/0.44  % Problem  : Preliminary Notions - Operations on Sets - Symmetric Difference
% 0.20/0.44  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.20/0.44  % English  : (! A:i.! B:i.! x:i.in x (symdiff A B) -> (! phi:o.(in x A ->
% 0.20/0.44  %            ~(in x B) -> phi) -> (~(in x A) -> in x B -> phi) -> phi))
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.44  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.20/0.44  % Names    : ZFC113l [Bro08]
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.44  % Rating   : 0.22 v9.1.0, 0.25 v9.0.0, 0.30 v8.2.0, 0.46 v8.1.0, 0.45 v7.5.0, 0.43 v7.4.0, 0.33 v7.2.0, 0.25 v7.1.0, 0.50 v7.0.0, 0.43 v6.4.0, 0.50 v6.3.0, 0.60 v6.2.0, 0.57 v5.5.0, 0.50 v5.4.0, 0.60 v4.1.0, 0.67 v4.0.1, 1.00 v4.0.0, 0.67 v3.7.0
% 0.20/0.44  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   4 unt;   7 typ;   4 def)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of atoms       :   23 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of connectives :   60 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &;  41   @)
% 0.20/0.44  %                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of variables   :   18 (   5   ^;  13   !;   0   ?;  18   :)
% 0.20/0.44  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=489
% 0.20/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.44  thf(in_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(dsetconstr_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(dsetconstrEL_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      dsetconstrEL: $o ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(dsetconstrEL,definition,
% 0.20/0.44      ( dsetconstrEL
% 0.20/0.44      = ( ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o,Xx: $i] :
% 0.20/0.44            ( ( in @ Xx
% 0.20/0.44              @ ( dsetconstr @ A
% 0.20/0.44                @ ^ [Xy: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xy ) ) )
% 0.20/0.44           => ( in @ Xx @ A ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(dsetconstrER_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      dsetconstrER: $o ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(dsetconstrER,definition,
% 0.20/0.44      ( dsetconstrER
% 0.20/0.44      = ( ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o,Xx: $i] :
% 0.20/0.44            ( ( in @ Xx
% 0.20/0.44              @ ( dsetconstr @ A
% 0.20/0.44                @ ^ [Xy: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xy ) ) )
% 0.20/0.44           => ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(binunion_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      binunion: $i > $i > $i ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(binunionE_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      binunionE: $o ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(binunionE,definition,
% 0.20/0.44      ( binunionE
% 0.20/0.44      = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 0.20/0.44            ( ( in @ Xx @ ( binunion @ A @ B ) )
% 0.20/0.44           => ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.20/0.44              | ( in @ Xx @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(symdiff_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      symdiff: $i > $i > $i ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(symdiff,definition,
% 0.20/0.44      ( symdiff
% 0.20/0.44      = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
% 0.20/0.44            ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ A @ B )
% 0.20/0.44            @ ^ [Xx: $i] :
% 0.20/0.44                ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.20/0.44                | ~ ( in @ Xx @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(symdiffE,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.44      ( dsetconstrEL
% 0.20/0.44     => ( dsetconstrER
% 0.20/0.44       => ( binunionE
% 0.20/0.44         => ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 0.20/0.44              ( ( in @ Xx @ ( symdiff @ A @ B ) )
% 0.20/0.44             => ! [Xphi: $o] :
% 0.20/0.44                  ( ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.20/0.44                   => ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 0.20/0.44                     => Xphi ) )
% 0.20/0.44                 => ( ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.20/0.44                     => ( ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 0.20/0.44                       => Xphi ) )
% 0.20/0.44                   => Xphi ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.44  ------------------------
% 1.58/1.35  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.58/1.35  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.58/1.35  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:29:00 EST 2026
% 1.58/1.35  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.58/1.35  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.58/1.35  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.58/1.35  
% 1.58/1.35  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2DTF10084.p
% See solution above
% 1.58/1.35  ------------------------
% 1.58/1.36  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.58/1.36  thf(in_type,type,
% 1.58/1.36      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(dsetconstr_type,type,
% 1.58/1.36      dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(dsetconstrEL_type,type,
% 1.58/1.36      dsetconstrEL: $o ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(dsetconstrEL,definition,
% 1.58/1.36      ( dsetconstrEL
% 1.58/1.36      = ( ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o,Xx: $i] :
% 1.58/1.36            ( ( in @ Xx
% 1.58/1.36              @ ( dsetconstr @ A
% 1.58/1.36                @ ^ [Xy: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xy ) ) )
% 1.58/1.36           => ( in @ Xx @ A ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(dsetconstrER_type,type,
% 1.58/1.36      dsetconstrER: $o ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(dsetconstrER,definition,
% 1.58/1.36      ( dsetconstrER
% 1.58/1.36      = ( ! [A: $i,Xphi: $i > $o,Xx: $i] :
% 1.58/1.36            ( ( in @ Xx
% 1.58/1.36              @ ( dsetconstr @ A
% 1.58/1.36                @ ^ [Xy: $i] : ( Xphi @ Xy ) ) )
% 1.58/1.36           => ( Xphi @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(binunion_type,type,
% 1.58/1.36      binunion: $i > $i > $i ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(binunionE_type,type,
% 1.58/1.36      binunionE: $o ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(binunionE,definition,
% 1.58/1.36      ( binunionE
% 1.58/1.36      = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 1.58/1.36            ( ( in @ Xx @ ( binunion @ A @ B ) )
% 1.58/1.36           => ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.58/1.36              | ( in @ Xx @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(symdiff_type,type,
% 1.58/1.36      symdiff: $i > $i > $i ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(symdiff,definition,
% 1.58/1.36      ( symdiff
% 1.58/1.36      = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
% 1.58/1.36            ( dsetconstr @ ( binunion @ A @ B )
% 1.58/1.36            @ ^ [Xx: $i] :
% 1.58/1.36                ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.58/1.36                | ~ ( in @ Xx @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.58/1.36  
% 1.58/1.36  thf(symdiffE,conjecture,
% 1.58/1.36      ( dsetconstrEL
% 1.58/1.36     => ( dsetconstrER
% 1.58/1.36       => ( binunionE
% 1.58/1.36         => ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 1.58/1.36              ( ( in @ Xx @ ( symdiff @ A @ B ) )
% 1.58/1.36             => ! [Xphi: $o] :
% 1.58/1.36                  ( ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.58/1.36                   => ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 1.58/1.36                     => Xphi ) )
% 1.58/1.36                 => ( ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.58/1.36                     => ( ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 1.58/1.36                       => Xphi ) )
% 1.58/1.36                   => Xphi ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.58/1.36  ------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10183)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10084 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10084 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10181)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10084 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10084 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10084 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10084 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10187)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10084 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.58/1.38  
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10185)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10184)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.58/1.38  
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10182)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.58/1.38  
% 1.58/1.38  
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10186)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.38  % (10187)First to succeed.
% 1.58/1.39  % (10181)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.58/1.39  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_10084
% 1.58/1.39  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_10084
% 1.58/1.39  thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(func_def_1, type, dsetconstr: $i > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(func_def_5, type, binunion: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(func_def_7, type, symdiff: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(func_def_22, type, sK6: $i > $o).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(func_def_28, type, sK12: $i > $o).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(func_def_30, type, ph14: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f128,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    $false),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f87,f88,f89,f106,f116,f119,f122,f126])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f126,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_3 | ~spl13_5),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f125])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f125,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    $false | (spl13_3 | ~spl13_5)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f124])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f124,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($false = $true) | (spl13_3 | ~spl13_5)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f123,f105])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f105,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | ~spl13_5),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f103])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f103,definition,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_5 <=> ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false)),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_5])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f123,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | spl13_3),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f109,f85])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f85,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true != (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | spl13_3),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f84])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f84,definition,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_3 <=> ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f109,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f108])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f108,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f71,f97])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f97,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true = (in @ sK1 @ (binunion @ sK2 @ sK0)))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f90])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f90,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true != $true) | ($true = (in @ sK1 @ (binunion @ sK2 @ sK0)))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f73,f74])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f74,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ (dsetconstr @ (binunion @ sK2 @ sK0) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((~ (in @ Y0 @ sK2)) | (~ (in @ Y0 @ sK0)))))) = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f58])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f58,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (dsetconstr @ (binunion @ Y0 @ Y1) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((~ (in @ Y2 @ Y0)) | (~ (in @ Y2 @ Y1)))))))) @ sK2 @ sK0)) = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f41,f50])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f50,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (symdiff = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (dsetconstr @ (binunion @ Y0 @ Y1) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((~ (in @ Y2 @ Y0)) | (~ (in @ Y2 @ Y1)))))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (symdiff = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (dsetconstr @ (binunion @ Y0 @ Y1) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((~ (in @ Y2 @ Y0)) | (~ (in @ Y2 @ Y1)))))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((^[X0 : $i, X1 : $i] : (dsetconstr @ (binunion @ X0 @ X1) @ (^[X2 : $i] : (~(in @ X2 @ X1) | ~(in @ X2 @ X0))))) = symdiff)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f4,axiom,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((^[X0 : $i, X4 : $i] : (dsetconstr @ (binunion @ X0 @ X4) @ (^[X2 : $i] : (~(in @ X2 @ X4) | ~(in @ X2 @ X0))))) = symdiff)),
% 1.58/1.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',symdiff)).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true = (in @ sK1 @ (symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0)))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrEL = $true) & (binunionE = $true) & ((($true != sK3) & (($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) != $true) | ($true = sK3)) & (($true != (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ($true = sK3) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true))) & ($true = (in @ sK1 @ (symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0)))) & (dsetconstrER = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f20,f26,f25])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (? [X3 : $o] : (($true != X3) & (((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X1 @ X2)) | ($true = X3)) & (((in @ X1 @ X0) != $true) | ($true = X3) | ($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)))) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)))) => (? [X3 : $o] : (($true != X3) & (($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) != $true) | ($true = X3)) & (($true != (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ($true = X3) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true))) & ($true = (in @ sK1 @ (symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0))))),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ? [X3 : $o] : (($true != X3) & (($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) != $true) | ($true = X3)) & (($true != (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ($true = X3) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true))) => (($true != sK3) & (($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) != $true) | ($true = sK3)) & (($true != (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ($true = sK3) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true)))),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrEL = $true) & (binunionE = $true) & ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (? [X3 : $o] : (($true != X3) & (((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X1 @ X2)) | ($true = X3)) & (((in @ X1 @ X0) != $true) | ($true = X3) | ($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)))) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)))) & (dsetconstrER = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (? [X3 : $o] : ((($true != X3) & ((($true = X3) | ((in @ X1 @ X0) != $true)) | ($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)))) & ((($true = X3) | ((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) | ($true != (in @ X1 @ X2)))) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)))) & (binunionE = $true)) & (dsetconstrER = $true)) & (dsetconstrEL = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ~((dsetconstrEL = $true) => ((dsetconstrER = $true) => ((binunionE = $true) => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0))) => ! [X3 : $o] : ((($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)) => (((in @ X1 @ X0) != $true) => ($true = X3))) => ((($true != (in @ X1 @ X2)) => (((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true) => ($true = X3))) => ($true = X3)))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ~((dsetconstrEL = $true) => ((dsetconstrER = $true) => ((binunionE = $true) => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0))) => ! [X3 : $o] : ((($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)) => (~((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true) => ($true = X3))) => ((~($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)) => (((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true) => ($true = X3))) => ($true = X3)))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ~(dsetconstrEL => (dsetconstrER => (binunionE => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)) => ! [X3 : $o] : (((in @ X1 @ X2) => (~(in @ X1 @ X0) => X3)) => ((~(in @ X1 @ X2) => ((in @ X1 @ X0) => X3)) => X3))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f6,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.58/1.39    ~(dsetconstrEL => (dsetconstrER => (binunionE => ! [X4 : $i,X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X0 @ X4)) => ! [X1 : $o] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) => (~(in @ X2 @ X4) => X1)) => ((~(in @ X2 @ X0) => ((in @ X2 @ X4) => X1)) => X1))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f5,conjecture,(
% 1.58/1.39    dsetconstrEL => (dsetconstrER => (binunionE => ! [X4 : $i,X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X0 @ X4)) => ! [X1 : $o] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) => (~(in @ X2 @ X4) => X1)) => ((~(in @ X2 @ X0) => ((in @ X2 @ X4) => X1)) => X1)))))),
% 1.58/1.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',symdiffE)).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f73,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true != (in @ X4 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ X5))) | ($true = (in @ X4 @ X3))) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f72])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f72,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true = (in @ X4 @ X3)) | ((in @ X4 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))) != $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f61])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f61,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (((in @ X4 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))) != $true) | ($true = (in @ X4 @ X3)) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f47,f46])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f46,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrEL = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true = (in @ X4 @ X3)) | ((in @ X4 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))) != $true) | (dsetconstrEL != $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((dsetconstrEL = $true) | (((in @ sK5 @ sK4) != $true) & ($true = (in @ sK5 @ (dsetconstr @ sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK6 @ Y0))))))) & (! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true = (in @ X4 @ X3)) | ((in @ X4 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))) != $true)) | (dsetconstrEL != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f29,f30])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (((in @ X1 @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))))) => (((in @ sK5 @ sK4) != $true) & ($true = (in @ sK5 @ (dsetconstr @ sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK6 @ Y0))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((dsetconstrEL = $true) | ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (((in @ X1 @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0))))))) & (! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true = (in @ X4 @ X3)) | ((in @ X4 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))) != $true)) | (dsetconstrEL != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((dsetconstrEL = $true) | ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (((in @ X1 @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0))))))) & (! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))))) | (dsetconstrEL != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrEL = $true) <=> ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0))))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (($true = (in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0))))) => ((in @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) <=> (dsetconstrEL = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : ((in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ X3)))) => (in @ X1 @ X0)) = dsetconstrEL)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.58/1.39    (! [X0 : $i,X2 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : ((in @ X2 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X1 @ X3)))) => (in @ X2 @ X0)) = dsetconstrEL)),
% 1.58/1.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',dsetconstrEL)).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f71,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i] : (($true != (in @ X5 @ (binunion @ X4 @ X3))) | ((in @ X5 @ X3) = $true) | ((in @ X5 @ X4) = $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f65])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f65,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ((in @ X5 @ X4) = $true) | ((in @ X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X5 @ (binunion @ X4 @ X3)))) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f51,f45])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (binunionE = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f51,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i] : (((in @ X5 @ X4) = $true) | ((in @ X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X5 @ (binunion @ X4 @ X3))) | (binunionE != $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f35])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((binunionE = $true) | (($true != (in @ sK9 @ sK8)) & ($true != (in @ sK9 @ sK7)) & ((in @ sK9 @ (binunion @ sK8 @ sK7)) = $true))) & (! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i] : (((in @ X5 @ X4) = $true) | ((in @ X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X5 @ (binunion @ X4 @ X3)))) | (binunionE != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7,sK8,sK9])],[f33,f34])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X1) != $true) & ((in @ X2 @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0)))) => (($true != (in @ sK9 @ sK8)) & ($true != (in @ sK9 @ sK7)) & ((in @ sK9 @ (binunion @ sK8 @ sK7)) = $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((binunionE = $true) | ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X1) != $true) & ((in @ X2 @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0))))) & (! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i] : (((in @ X5 @ X4) = $true) | ((in @ X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X5 @ (binunion @ X4 @ X3)))) | (binunionE != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((binunionE = $true) | ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X1) != $true) & ((in @ X2 @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0))))) & (! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X1) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0)))) | (binunionE != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (binunionE = $true) <=> ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ X1) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (binunionE = $true) <=> ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $true)) | ($true != (in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (binunionE = $true) <=> ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0))) => (((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $true)))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X0)) => ((in @ X2 @ X0) | (in @ X2 @ X1))) = binunionE)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.58/1.39    (! [X4 : $i,X0 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ (binunion @ X0 @ X4)) => ((in @ X2 @ X4) | (in @ X2 @ X0))) = binunionE)),
% 1.58/1.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',binunionE)).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f122,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ~spl13_2 | ~spl13_5),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f121])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f121,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    $false | (~spl13_2 | ~spl13_5)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f120])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f120,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($false = $true) | (~spl13_2 | ~spl13_5)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f81,f105])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f81,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ~spl13_2),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f80])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f80,definition,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_2 <=> ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f119,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_2 | ~spl13_4),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f118,f99,f80])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f99,definition,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_4 <=> ($false = (in @ sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f118,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ~spl13_4),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f117])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f117,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ($false = $true) | ~spl13_4),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f109,f101])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f101,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($false = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ~spl13_4),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f99])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f116,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ~spl13_3 | ~spl13_4),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f115])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f115,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    $false | (~spl13_3 | ~spl13_4)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f114])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f114,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($false = $true) | (~spl13_3 | ~spl13_4)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f86,f101])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f86,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ~spl13_3),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f84])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f106,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_4 | spl13_5),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f96,f103,f99])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f96,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($false = (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f95])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f95,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | ((~ (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f94])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f94,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true = (~ (in @ sK1 @ sK2))) | ((~ (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f93])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f93,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true = ((~ (in @ sK1 @ sK2)) | (~ (in @ sK1 @ sK0))))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f92])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f92,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((~ (in @ Y0 @ sK2)) | (~ (in @ Y0 @ sK0)))) @ sK1))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f91])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f91,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true != $true) | ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((~ (in @ Y0 @ sK2)) | (~ (in @ Y0 @ sK0)))) @ sK1))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f70,f74])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f70,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true != (in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X4 @ X5))) | ((X5 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f69])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f69,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true != (in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X4 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0))))) | ((X5 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f68])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f68,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (($true != $true) | ((X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X4 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))))) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f55,f40])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrER = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f55,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X4 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0))))) | (dsetconstrER != $true)) )),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((dsetconstrER = $true) | (($true != (sK12 @ sK10)) & ((in @ sK10 @ (dsetconstr @ sK11 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK12 @ Y0)))) = $true))) & (! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X4 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))))) | (dsetconstrER != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK10,sK11,sK12])],[f37,f38])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ X0)) & ((in @ X0 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) = $true)) => (($true != (sK12 @ sK10)) & ((in @ sK10 @ (dsetconstr @ sK11 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK12 @ Y0)))) = $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((dsetconstrER = $true) | ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ X0)) & ((in @ X0 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) = $true))) & (! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X5 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X4 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X5 @ Y0)))))) | (dsetconstrER != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((dsetconstrER = $true) | ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ X0)) & ((in @ X0 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) = $true))) & (! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (($true = (X2 @ X0)) | ((in @ X0 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) != $true)) | (dsetconstrER != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrER = $true) <=> ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (($true = (X2 @ X0)) | ((in @ X0 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) != $true))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : (((in @ X0 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) = $true) => ($true = (X2 @ X0))) <=> (dsetconstrER = $true)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrER = ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $o] : ((in @ X0 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ X3)))) => (X2 @ X0)))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.58/1.39    (dsetconstrER = ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : ((in @ X2 @ (dsetconstr @ X0 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X1 @ X3)))) => (X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.58/1.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Xc5ErJGZtb/DTF2THF_10084.p',dsetconstrER)).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f89,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ~spl13_1),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f44,f76])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f76,definition,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_1 <=> ($true = sK3)),
% 1.58/1.39    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl13_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ($true != sK3)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f88,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_1 | spl13_2 | ~spl13_3),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f42,f84,f80,f76])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ($true != (in @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ($true = sK3)),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f87,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    spl13_1 | ~spl13_2 | spl13_3),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f43,f84,f80,f76])).
% 1.58/1.39  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.58/1.39    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) != $true) | ($true = sK3) | ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.58/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.58/1.39  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_10084
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.58/1.39  
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.39  % (10187)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.39  % (10180)Success in time 0.023 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------