↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU614^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:35:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.61s 1.36s
% Output   : Refutation 1.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  19 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  412 (  90 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  673 (  60   ~;  39   |;  13   &; 406   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>; 128  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  25  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  121 (  29   ^;  83   !;   9   ?; 121   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    symdiff: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(f124,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f83,f101,f123]) ).

thf(f123,plain,
    ~ spl3_8,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f122]) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f119]) ).

thf(f119,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f15,f116]) ).

thf(f116,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f115]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f113,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( symdiffE = $true )
    & ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( in @ sK1 @ ( symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
      = $true )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f11,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        & ( ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( in @ sK1 @ ( symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
        = $true )
      & ( $true
        = ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( symdiffE = $true )
    & ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        & ( ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
    & ( symdiffE = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( ( symdiffE = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
         => ( ( $true
              = ( in @ X1 @ X0 ) )
           => ( ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) )
             != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ( ( symdiffE = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
         => ( ( $true
              = ( in @ X1 @ X0 ) )
           => ( ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) )
             != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( symdiffE
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
         => ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
           => ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( symdiffE
     => ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
           => ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( symdiffE
   => ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
       => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
         => ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gK8q6H94QX/DTF2THF_15416.p',symdiffIneg1) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f109]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( in @ sK1 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f82,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK1 @ ( symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
          = $false )
        | ( $false
          = ( in @ X2 @ X3 ) )
        | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f81]) ).

thf(f81,definition,
    ( spl3_8
  <=> ! [X2: $i,X1: $i,X3: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( $false
          = ( in @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ sK1 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ~ spl3_7,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f100]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f97]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $o] : ( $false != X0 )
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f4,f78]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( ! [X4: $o] : ( $true = X4 )
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f77]) ).

thf(f77,definition,
    ( spl3_7
  <=> ! [X4: $o] : ( $true = X4 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    $true != $false,
    introduced(definition,[],[fool_axiom]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( spl3_8
    | spl3_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f44,f77,f81]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( $true = X4 )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true = X4 )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true = X4 )
      | ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
         => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
           => X4 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
           => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             => X4 ) )
         => X4 ) )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
           => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             => X4 ) )
         => X4 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
         => X4 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
           => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             => X4 ) )
         => X4 ) )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
         => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
           => X4 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
           => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             => X4 ) )
         => X4 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
           => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             => X4 ) )
         => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
             => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
               => X4 ) )
           => X4 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i,X4: $o] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: $o] :
              ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
               => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                 => Y0 ) )
             => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                   => Y0 ) )
               => Y0 ) )
          @ X4 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( !! @ $o
          @ ^ [Y0: $o] :
              ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
               => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                 => Y0 ) )
             => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                   => Y0 ) )
               => Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X3 @ X1 ) )
       => ( !! @ $o
          @ ^ [Y0: $o] :
              ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
               => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                 => Y0 ) )
             => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                   => Y0 ) )
               => Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
           => ( !! @ $o
              @ ^ [Y1: $o] :
                  ( ( ( in @ X2 @ Y0 )
                   => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                     => Y1 ) )
                 => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ Y0 )
                     => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                       => Y1 ) )
                   => Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ X3 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
           => ( !! @ $o
              @ ^ [Y1: $o] :
                  ( ( ( in @ X2 @ Y0 )
                   => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                     => Y1 ) )
                 => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ Y0 )
                     => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                       => Y1 ) )
                   => Y1 ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( symdiff @ Y1 @ X1 ) )
               => ( !! @ $o
                  @ ^ [Y2: $o] :
                      ( ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                       => ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ X1 )
                         => Y2 ) )
                     => ( ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                         => ( ( in @ Y0 @ X1 )
                           => Y2 ) )
                       => Y2 ) ) ) ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( symdiff @ Y1 @ X1 ) )
               => ( !! @ $o
                  @ ^ [Y2: $o] :
                      ( ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                       => ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ X1 )
                         => Y2 ) )
                     => ( ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                         => ( ( in @ Y0 @ X1 )
                           => Y2 ) )
                       => Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                   => ( !! @ $o
                      @ ^ [Y3: $o] :
                          ( ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                           => ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                             => Y3 ) )
                         => ( ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                             => ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                               => Y3 ) )
                           => Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                 => ( !! @ $o
                    @ ^ [Y3: $o] :
                        ( ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                         => ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                           => Y3 ) )
                       => ( ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                           => ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                             => Y3 ) )
                         => Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f18,f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( symdiffE
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                 => ( !! @ $o
                    @ ^ [Y3: $o] :
                        ( ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                         => ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                           => Y3 ) )
                       => ( ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                           => ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                             => Y3 ) )
                         => Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( symdiffE
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0 ) )
                 => ( !! @ $o
                    @ ^ [Y3: $o] :
                        ( ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                         => ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                           => Y3 ) )
                       => ( ( ~ ( in @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                           => ( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                             => Y3 ) )
                         => Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( symdiffE
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ ( symdiff @ X0 @ X2 ) )
         => ! [X3: $o] :
              ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
               => ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
                 => X3 ) )
             => ( ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
                 => ( ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
                   => X3 ) )
               => X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( symdiffE
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ ( symdiff @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         => ! [X3: $o] :
              ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
               => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                 => X3 ) )
             => ( ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                 => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                   => X3 ) )
               => X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gK8q6H94QX/DTF2THF_15416.p',symdiffE) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    symdiffE = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU614^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:30:03 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.27/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.27/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.27/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.46  % File     : SEU614^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.27/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.27/0.46  % Problem  : Preliminary Notions - Operations on Sets - Symmetric Difference
% 0.27/0.46  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.27/0.46  % English  : (! A:i.! B:i.! x:i.in x A -> in x B -> ~(in x (symdiff A B)))
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.27/0.46  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.27/0.46  % Names    : ZFC116l [Bro08]
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.27/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.14 v6.1.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.27/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   1 unt;   3 typ;   1 def)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :   11 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   33 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  20   @)
% 0.27/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    7 (   0   ^;   7   !;   0   ?;   7   :)
% 0.27/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=492
% 0.27/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.46  thf(in_type,type,
% 0.27/0.46      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  thf(symdiff_type,type,
% 0.27/0.46      symdiff: $i > $i > $i ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  thf(symdiffE_type,type,
% 0.27/0.46      symdiffE: $o ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  thf(symdiffE,definition,
% 0.27/0.46      ( symdiffE
% 0.27/0.46      = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 0.27/0.46            ( ( in @ Xx @ ( symdiff @ A @ B ) )
% 0.27/0.46           => ! [Xphi: $o] :
% 0.27/0.46                ( ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.27/0.46                 => ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 0.27/0.46                   => Xphi ) )
% 0.27/0.46               => ( ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.27/0.46                   => ( ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 0.27/0.46                     => Xphi ) )
% 0.27/0.46                 => Xphi ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  thf(symdiffIneg1,conjecture,
% 0.27/0.46      ( symdiffE
% 0.27/0.46     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 0.27/0.46          ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.27/0.46         => ( ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 0.27/0.46           => ~ ( in @ Xx @ ( symdiff @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.61/1.32  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.61/1.32  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:30:04 EST 2026
% 1.61/1.32  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.61/1.32  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.61/1.32  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.61/1.32  
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gK8q6H94QX/DTF2DTF15416.p
% See solution above
% 1.61/1.32  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.33  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.61/1.33  thf(in_type,type,
% 1.61/1.33      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.61/1.33  
% 1.61/1.33  thf(symdiff_type,type,
% 1.61/1.33      symdiff: $i > $i > $i ).
% 1.61/1.33  
% 1.61/1.33  thf(symdiffE_type,type,
% 1.61/1.33      symdiffE: $o ).
% 1.61/1.33  
% 1.61/1.33  thf(symdiffE,definition,
% 1.61/1.33      ( symdiffE
% 1.61/1.33      = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 1.61/1.33            ( ( in @ Xx @ ( symdiff @ A @ B ) )
% 1.61/1.33           => ! [Xphi: $o] :
% 1.61/1.33                ( ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.61/1.33                 => ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 1.61/1.33                   => Xphi ) )
% 1.61/1.33               => ( ( ~ ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.61/1.33                   => ( ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 1.61/1.33                     => Xphi ) )
% 1.61/1.33                 => Xphi ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.61/1.33  
% 1.61/1.33  thf(symdiffIneg1,conjecture,
% 1.61/1.33      ( symdiffE
% 1.61/1.33     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xx: $i] :
% 1.61/1.33          ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.61/1.33         => ( ( in @ Xx @ B )
% 1.61/1.33           => ~ ( in @ Xx @ ( symdiff @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.61/1.33  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.34  % (15687)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.35  
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15687)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15681)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15682)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15683)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15686)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.61/1.35  
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15684)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.61/1.35  
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.35  % (15685)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.36  
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.36  % (15682)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)First to succeed.
% 1.61/1.36  % (15686)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.61/1.36  % (15688)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15416 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.61/1.36  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_15416
% 1.61/1.36  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_15416
% 1.61/1.36  thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(func_def_1, type, symdiff: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(func_def_4, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f124,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    $false),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f83,f101,f123])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f123,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f122])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f122,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    $false | ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f119])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f119,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ($true = $false) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f15,f116])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f116,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f115])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f115,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ($true = $false) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f113,f17])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ((in @ sK1 @ sK0) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    (symdiffE = $true) & (((in @ sK1 @ sK0) = $true) & ((in @ sK1 @ (symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0)) = $true) & ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK2)))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f11,f12])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X1 @ X0)) & ((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)) = $true) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ X2))) => (((in @ sK1 @ sK0) = $true) & ((in @ sK1 @ (symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0)) = $true) & ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK2)))),
% 1.61/1.36    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    (symdiffE = $true) & ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X1 @ X0)) & ((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)) = $true) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)) = $true) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ X0))) & ($true = (in @ X1 @ X2))) & (symdiffE = $true)),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ~((symdiffE = $true) => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)) => (($true = (in @ X1 @ X0)) => ((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)) != $true))))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ~((symdiffE = $true) => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (in @ X1 @ X2)) => (($true = (in @ X1 @ X0)) => ~((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)) = $true))))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ~(symdiffE => ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((in @ X1 @ X2) => ((in @ X1 @ X0) => ~(in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X2 @ X0)))))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.36    ~(symdiffE => ! [X1 : $i,X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => ~(in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X0 @ X1)))))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.36    symdiffE => ! [X1 : $i,X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => ~(in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X0 @ X1))))),
% 1.61/1.36    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gK8q6H94QX/DTF2THF_15416.p',symdiffIneg1)).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f113,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK0) = $false) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f109])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f109,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ($true = $false) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | ((in @ sK1 @ sK0) = $false) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f82,f16])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ((in @ sK1 @ (symdiff @ sK2 @ sK0)) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f82,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | ($false = (in @ X2 @ X3)) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $false)) ) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f81])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f81,definition,(
% 1.61/1.36    spl3_8 <=> ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i,X3 : $i] : (((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $false) | ($false = (in @ X2 @ X3)))),
% 1.61/1.36    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_8])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ($true = (in @ sK1 @ sK2))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f101,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ~spl3_7),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f100])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f100,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    $false | ~spl3_7),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f97])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f97,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X0 : $o] : (($false != X0)) ) | ~spl3_7),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f4,f78])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f78,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X4 : $o] : (($true = X4)) ) | ~spl3_7),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f77])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f77,definition,(
% 1.61/1.36    spl3_7 <=> ! [X4 : $o] : ($true = X4)),
% 1.61/1.36    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_7])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ($true != $false)),
% 1.61/1.36    introduced(definition,[],[fool_axiom])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f83,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    spl3_8 | spl3_7),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f44,f77,f81])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : (($true = X4) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | ($false = (in @ X2 @ X3)) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f43])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $false) | ($true = X4) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : (((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $false) | ($true = X4) | (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => X4)) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : (($true = (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => X4)) => X4)) | ((in @ X2 @ X1) = $false) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : (((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | ($true = (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => X4)) => X4))) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : ((((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => X4) = $false) | ($true = (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => X4)) => X4)) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : ((((in @ X2 @ X3) => ((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => X4)) = $false) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | ($true = (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => X4)) => X4))) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : (((((in @ X2 @ X3) => ((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => X4)) => (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => X4)) => X4)) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i,X4 : $o] : (((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false) | (((^[Y0 : $o]: (((in @ X2 @ X3) => ((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => Y0)) => (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => Y0)) => Y0))) @ X4) = $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (!! @ $o @ (^[Y0 : $o]: (((in @ X2 @ X3) => ((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => Y0)) => (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => Y0)) => Y0))))) | ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X1)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y0 : $o]: (((in @ X2 @ X3) => ((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => Y0)) => (((~ (in @ X2 @ X3)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => Y0)) => Y0))))))) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ Y0 @ X1)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y1 : $o]: (((in @ X2 @ Y0) => ((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => Y1)) => (((~ (in @ X2 @ Y0)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => Y1)) => Y1)))))) @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ Y0 @ X1)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y1 : $o]: (((in @ X2 @ Y0) => ((~ (in @ X2 @ X1)) => Y1)) => (((~ (in @ X2 @ Y0)) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => Y1)) => Y1))))))) = $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ (symdiff @ Y1 @ X1)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y2 : $o]: (((in @ Y0 @ Y1) => ((~ (in @ Y0 @ X1)) => Y2)) => (((~ (in @ Y0 @ Y1)) => ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => Y2)) => Y2)))))))) @ X2))) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((in @ Y0 @ (symdiff @ Y1 @ X1)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y2 : $o]: (((in @ Y0 @ Y1) => ((~ (in @ Y0 @ X1)) => Y2)) => (((~ (in @ Y0 @ Y1)) => ((in @ Y0 @ X1) => Y2)) => Y2))))))))) = $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y3 : $o]: (((in @ Y1 @ Y2) => ((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y0)) => Y3)) => (((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y2)) => ((in @ Y1 @ Y0) => Y3)) => Y3)))))))))) @ X1))) )),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y3 : $o]: (((in @ Y1 @ Y2) => ((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y0)) => Y3)) => (((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y2)) => ((in @ Y1 @ Y0) => Y3)) => Y3))))))))))) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f18,f14])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    (symdiffE = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y3 : $o]: (((in @ Y1 @ Y2) => ((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y0)) => Y3)) => (((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y2)) => ((in @ Y1 @ Y0) => Y3)) => Y3))))))))))))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    (symdiffE = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((in @ Y1 @ (symdiff @ Y2 @ Y0)) => (!! @ $o @ (^[Y3 : $o]: (((in @ Y1 @ Y2) => ((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y0)) => Y3)) => (((~ (in @ Y1 @ Y2)) => ((in @ Y1 @ Y0) => Y3)) => Y3))))))))))))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    (symdiffE = ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X0 @ X2)) => ! [X3 : $o] : (((in @ X1 @ X0) => (~(in @ X1 @ X2) => X3)) => ((~(in @ X1 @ X0) => ((in @ X1 @ X2) => X3)) => X3))))),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.36    (symdiffE = ! [X0 : $i,X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((in @ X2 @ (symdiff @ X0 @ X1)) => ! [X3 : $o] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) => (~(in @ X2 @ X1) => X3)) => ((~(in @ X2 @ X0) => ((in @ X2 @ X1) => X3)) => X3))))),
% 1.61/1.36    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gK8q6H94QX/DTF2THF_15416.p',symdiffE)).
% 1.61/1.36  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.61/1.36    (symdiffE = $true)),
% 1.61/1.36    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.61/1.36  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_15416
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.61/1.36  
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.36  % (15683)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.36  % (15680)Success in time 0.023 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------