↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU632^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:02:05 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.51s 4.71s
% Output   : Proof 4.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEU632^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 06:35:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.51/4.71  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.51/4.71  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq kpairp (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), iskpair (kpair Xx Xy))) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 4.51/4.71    (Eq cartprodmempair1
% 4.51/4.71      (∀ (A B Xu : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71        in Xu (cartprod A B) → Exists fun Xx => And (in Xx A) (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy B) (Eq Xu (kpair Xx Xy)))))
% 4.51/4.71    True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (kpairp → cartprodmempair1 → ∀ (A B Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod A B) → iskpair Xu)) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): Eq (kpairp → cartprodmempair1 → ∀ (A B Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod A B) → iskpair Xu) False
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): Eq kpairp True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (cartprodmempair1 → ∀ (A B Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod A B) → iskpair Xu) False
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): Eq cartprodmempair1 True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): Eq (∀ (A B Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod A B) → iskpair Xu) False
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod (skS.0 0 a) B) → iskpair Xu)) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod (skS.0 0 a) B) → iskpair Xu) False
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) → iskpair Xu)) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xu : Iota), in Xu (cartprod (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) → iskpair Xu) False
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Eq (Not (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (cartprod (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) → iskpair (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2))) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (cartprod (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) → iskpair (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)) False
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (cartprod (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #17 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (iskpair (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)) False
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #18 (by clausification #[2]): Eq kpairp (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), iskpair (kpair Xx Xy))
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #19 (by forward demodulation #[18, 6]): Eq True (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), iskpair (kpair Xx Xy))
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), iskpair (kpair a Xy)) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (iskpair (kpair a a_1)) True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #33 (by clausification #[3]): Eq cartprodmempair1
% 4.51/4.71    (∀ (A B Xu : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71      in Xu (cartprod A B) → Exists fun Xx => And (in Xx A) (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy B) (Eq Xu (kpair Xx Xy))))
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #34 (by forward demodulation #[33, 8]): Eq True
% 4.51/4.71    (∀ (A B Xu : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71      in Xu (cartprod A B) → Exists fun Xx => And (in Xx A) (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy B) (Eq Xu (kpair Xx Xy))))
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Eq
% 4.51/4.71      (∀ (B Xu : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71        in Xu (cartprod a B) → Exists fun Xx => And (in Xx a) (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy B) (Eq Xu (kpair Xx Xy))))
% 4.51/4.71      True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #36 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Eq
% 4.51/4.71      (∀ (Xu : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71        in Xu (cartprod a a_1) → Exists fun Xx => And (in Xx a) (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy a_1) (Eq Xu (kpair Xx Xy))))
% 4.51/4.71      True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Eq
% 4.51/4.71      (in a (cartprod a_1 a_2) → Exists fun Xx => And (in Xx a_1) (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy a_2) (Eq a (kpair Xx Xy))))
% 4.51/4.71      True
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #38 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Or (Eq (in a (cartprod a_1 a_2)) False)
% 4.51/4.71      (Eq (Exists fun Xx => And (in Xx a_1) (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy a_2) (Eq a (kpair Xx Xy)))) True)
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #39 (by clausification #[38]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Or (Eq (in a (cartprod a_1 a_2)) False)
% 4.51/4.71      (Eq
% 4.51/4.71        (And (in (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a a_3) a_1)
% 4.51/4.71          (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy a_2) (Eq a (kpair (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a a_3) Xy))))
% 4.51/4.71        True)
% 4.51/4.71  Clause #40 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 4.51/4.71    Or (Eq (in a (cartprod a_1 a_2)) False)
% 4.57/4.73      (Eq (Exists fun Xy => And (in Xy a_2) (Eq a (kpair (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a a_3) Xy))) True)
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #42 (by clausification #[40]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : Iota),
% 4.57/4.73    Or (Eq (in a (cartprod a_1 a_2)) False)
% 4.57/4.73      (Eq (And (in (skS.0 4 a_2 a a_1 a_3 a_4) a_2) (Eq a (kpair (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a a_3) (skS.0 4 a_2 a a_1 a_3 a_4))))
% 4.57/4.73        True)
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #43 (by clausification #[42]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : Iota),
% 4.57/4.73    Or (Eq (in a (cartprod a_1 a_2)) False) (Eq (Eq a (kpair (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a a_3) (skS.0 4 a_2 a a_1 a_3 a_4))) True)
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #45 (by clausification #[43]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : Iota),
% 4.57/4.73    Or (Eq (in a (cartprod a_1 a_2)) False) (Eq a (kpair (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a a_3) (skS.0 4 a_2 a a_1 a_3 a_4)))
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #46 (by superposition #[45, 16]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : Iota),
% 4.57/4.73    Or
% 4.57/4.73      (Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)
% 4.57/4.73        (kpair (skS.0 3 (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) a_3)
% 4.57/4.73          (skS.0 4 (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) a_3 a_4)))
% 4.57/4.73      (Eq False True)
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #175 (by clausification #[46]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 : Iota),
% 4.57/4.73    Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)
% 4.57/4.73      (kpair (skS.0 3 (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) a_3)
% 4.57/4.73        (skS.0 4 (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2) (skS.0 0 a) a_3 a_4))
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #176 (by superposition #[175, 21]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (iskpair (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)) True
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #188 (by superposition #[176, 17]): Eq True False
% 4.57/4.73  Clause #195 (by clausification #[188]): False
% 4.57/4.73  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------