↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU633_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:39:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.35s 1.64s
% Output   : Refutation 3.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (  12 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  216 (  28   ~;  18   |;   9   &; 135   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  26  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   3   ^;  35   !;   5   ?;  46   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(setunion_decl,type,
    setunion: $i > $i ).

thf(setunionE_decl,type,
    setunionE: $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $o > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
             => ? [C: $i] :
                  ( ( C @ ( B @ in ) )
                  & ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( sk1 @ setunion @ ( A @ in ) )
           => ? [B: $i] :
                ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
                & ( sk1 @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( ^ [A: $o,B: $i,C: $i] :
        @+[D: $i] :
          ~ ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
           => ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
             => A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( setunionE
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
       => ? [C: $i] :
            ( ( C @ ( B @ in ) )
            & ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setunionE2) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setunionE
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
         => ? [C: $i] :
              ( ( C @ ( B @ in ) )
              & ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( setunionE
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
         => ? [C: $i] :
              ( ( C @ ( B @ in ) )
              & ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ ( sk2 @ in ) )
        | ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ in ) ) )
      & ( sk1 @ setunion @ ( sk2 @ in ) )
      & setunionE ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    sk1 @ setunion @ ( sk2 @ in ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( sk2 @ in ) )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ setunion @ ( sk2 @ in ) )
       != ( A @ ( sk2 @ in ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,8]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ setunion @ ( sk2 @ in ) )
       != ( A @ ( sk2 @ in ) ) )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk1 @ setunion @ in ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[19:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 @ setunion ))]]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    setunionE,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( setunionE
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
         => ! [C: $o] :
              ( ! [D: $i] :
                  ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
                 => ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
                   => C ) )
             => C ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setunionE) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( setunionE
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
         => ! [C: $o] :
              ( ! [D: $i] :
                  ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
                 => ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
                   => C ) )
             => C ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( setunionE
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
         => ! [C: $o] :
              ( ! [D: $i] :
                  ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
                 => ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
                   => C ) )
             => C ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) )
     => ! [C: $o] :
          ( ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
             => ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
               => C ) )
         => C ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[10,6]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [C: $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C
        | ~ C
        | ~ ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) ) )
      & ( C
        | ( A @ ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ sk3 ) ) @ in ) )
        | ~ ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) ) )
      & ( C
        | ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ sk3 ) ) @ ( B @ in ) )
        | ~ ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [C: $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( C
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ sk3 ) ) @ ( B @ in ) )
      | ~ ( A @ setunion @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( A @ ( sk2 @ in ) )
       != ( sk1 @ ( A @ in ) ) )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk1 )
      | ( sk2 != A )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ( ( sk2 != sk1 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ in ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(132,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[20,6,9,13,7,26,8,4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU633_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.40  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 10:12:39 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.70/0.71  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.93/0.81  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (93ms). 
% 0.93/0.81  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.11/1.01  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.11/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.41/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.41/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.41/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.41/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.41/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 1.41/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.41/1.10  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.35/1.63  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.35/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.35/1.63  % Time passed: 1138ms (effective reasoning time: 819ms)
% 3.35/1.63  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.35/1.64  % Axioms used in derivation (1): setunionE
% 3.35/1.64  % No. of inferences in proof: 20
% 3.35/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1138 ms resp. 819 ms w/o parsing
% 3.35/1.66  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.35/1.66  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------