↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU642^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:30:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   65 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  549 ( 165 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  564 (  67   ~;  67   |;  38   &; 358   @)
%                                         (   8 <=>;  26  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   24 (  21 usr;  19 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  106 (   0 sgn  83   !;  23   ?; 106   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    setadjoinIL: $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    uniqinunit: $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    upairset2E: $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    singletonsuniq: $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      = setadjoinIL ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setadjoinIL) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) )
       => ( X0 = X1 ) )
      = uniqinunit ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',uniqinunit) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) )
       => ( ( X2 = X0 )
          | ( X2 = X1 ) ) )
      = upairset2E ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',upairset2E) ).

thf(f5,conjecture,
    ( setadjoinIL
   => ( uniqinunit
     => ( upairset2E
       => ( singletonsuniq
         => ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
              ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
             => ( X0 = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setukpairinjL1) ).

thf(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setadjoinIL
     => ( uniqinunit
       => ( upairset2E
         => ( singletonsuniq
           => ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
               => ( X0 = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) )
       => ( X0 = X1 ) )
      = uniqinunit ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
       => ( X0 = X1 ) )
  <=> ( uniqinunit = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( setadjoinIL
     => ( uniqinunit
       => ( upairset2E
         => ( singletonsuniq
           => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
                ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
               => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ~ ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
     => ( ( uniqinunit = $true )
       => ( ( upairset2E = $true )
         => ( ( singletonsuniq = $true )
           => ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
                ( ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
                  = $true )
               => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
       => ( ( X1 = X2 )
          | ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
      = upairset2E ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( upairset2E = $true )
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
          = $true )
       => ( ( X0 = X1 )
          | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      = setadjoinIL ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X1 ) )
        = $true )
  <=> ( setadjoinIL = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ? [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( singletonsuniq = $true )
    & ( upairset2E = $true )
    & ( uniqinunit = $true )
    & ( setadjoinIL = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ? [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( upairset2E = $true )
    & ( singletonsuniq = $true )
    & ( setadjoinIL = $true )
    & ( uniqinunit = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( upairset2E = $true )
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( X0 = X1 )
        | ( X1 = X2 )
        | ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
         != $true )
        | ( X0 = X1 )
        | ( X1 = X2 ) )
  <=> ( upairset2E = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
        | ( X0 = X1 ) )
  <=> ( uniqinunit = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X1 ) )
          = $true )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) )
    & ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
      | ? [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) )
    & ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
      | ? [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ X2 ) )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) )
    & ( ( setadjoinIL = $true )
      | ( ( in @ sK1 @ ( setadjoin @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
       != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X2,sK0),skolemize(X3,sK1)],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
           != $true )
          | ( X0 = X1 )
          | ( X1 = X2 ) )
      | ( upairset2E != $true ) )
    & ( ( upairset2E = $true )
      | ? [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
            = $true )
          & ( X0 != X1 )
          & ( X1 != X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) )
           != $true )
          | ( X0 = X1 )
          | ( X0 = X2 ) )
      | ( upairset2E != $true ) )
    & ( ( upairset2E = $true )
      | ? [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X5 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) ) ) )
          & ( X3 != X4 )
          & ( X3 != X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) )
           != $true )
          | ( X0 = X1 )
          | ( X0 = X2 ) )
      | ( upairset2E != $true ) )
    & ( ( upairset2E = $true )
      | ( ( ( in @ sK2 @ ( setadjoin @ sK4 @ ( setadjoin @ sK3 @ emptyset ) ) )
          = $true )
        & ( sK2 != sK3 )
        & ( sK2 != sK4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X3,sK2),skolemize(X4,sK3),skolemize(X5,sK4)],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
          | ( X0 = X1 ) )
      | ( uniqinunit != $true ) )
    & ( ( uniqinunit = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
          & ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
          | ( X0 = X1 ) )
      | ( uniqinunit != $true ) )
    & ( ( uniqinunit = $true )
      | ? [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
          & ( X2 != X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
          | ( X0 = X1 ) )
      | ( uniqinunit != $true ) )
    & ( ( uniqinunit = $true )
      | ( ( $true
          = ( in @ sK6 @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) ) )
        & ( sK6 != sK5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5,sK6]),skolemize(X2,sK5),skolemize(X3,sK6)],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X2 )
        & ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( upairset2E = $true )
    & ( singletonsuniq = $true )
    & ( setadjoinIL = $true )
    & ( uniqinunit = $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( sK9 != sK7 )
    & ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ ( setadjoin @ sK8 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
      = $true )
    & ( upairset2E = $true )
    & ( singletonsuniq = $true )
    & ( setadjoinIL = $true )
    & ( uniqinunit = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7,sK8,sK9]),skolemize(X0,sK7),skolemize(X1,sK8),skolemize(X2,sK9)],[f31]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( setadjoinIL != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) )
       != $true )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ( X0 = X2 )
      | ( upairset2E != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ( uniqinunit != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    uniqinunit = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    setadjoinIL = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    upairset2E = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ ( setadjoin @ sK8 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    sK9 != sK7,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f37,f46]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ( X0 = X2 )
      | ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f41,f48]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f44,f45]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) )
       != $true )
      | ( X0 = X2 )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f58]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ ( setadjoin @ sK8 @ emptyset ) )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) )
    | ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ emptyset )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f70,f49]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ ( setadjoin @ sK8 @ emptyset ) )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) )
    | ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ emptyset )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f84]) ).

thf(f87,definition,
    ( spl12_1
  <=> ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ ( setadjoin @ sK8 @ emptyset ) )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl12_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ ( setadjoin @ sK8 @ emptyset ) )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) )
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f87]) ).

thf(f90,definition,
    ( spl12_2
  <=> ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ emptyset )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl12_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( ( ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ emptyset )
      = ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) )
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f90]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( spl12_1
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f85,f90,f87]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK9 @ ( setadjoin @ sK7 @ emptyset ) )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f71,f91]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( ( sK9 = sK7 )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f69,f94]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( ( sK9 = sK7 )
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f99]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f100,f50]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ~ spl12_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f101]) ).

thf(f108,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( in @ sK7 @ ( setadjoin @ sK9 @ emptyset ) ) )
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f71,f88]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( sK9 = sK7 )
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f69,f108]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( ( sK9 = sK7 )
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f112]) ).

thf(f120,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f115,f50]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ~ spl12_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f120]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl12_1
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f92]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ~ spl12_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f102]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ~ spl12_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f121]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s2,s5]) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU642^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:04:11 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.28  % (123550)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.23/0.28  % (123560)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=3774724544:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.23/0.28  % (123560) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-123550-123560"...
% 0.23/0.28  % (123561)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.23/0.28  % (123561)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.23/0.28  % (123560)...printing done.
% 0.23/0.28  % (123560)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.23/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.23/0.29  % (123560)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.23/0.29  % (123550)Success in time 0.034 s
% 0.23/0.29  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------