↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU649^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:24:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  120 (  55 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   22 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  486 (  27   ~;  45   |;   9   &; 368   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  32  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   28 (   9 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   0   ^;  77   !;   0   ?;  77   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    emptyset: $i ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    setext: $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    setadjoinIL: $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    uniqinunit: $o ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    eqinunit: $o ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    upairset2E: $o ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    esk1_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    esk2_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_33,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_34,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(setukpairinjR11,conjecture,
    ( setext
   => ( setadjoinIL
     => ( uniqinunit
       => ( eqinunit
         => ( upairset2E
           => ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
                ( ( X3 = X4 )
               => ( ( setadjoin @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) )
                  = ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6b7ULGU2Gu/E---3.1_1103086.p',setukpairinjR11) ).

thf(setext,axiom,
    ( setext
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           => ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
       => ( ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
             => ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6b7ULGU2Gu/E---3.1_1103086.p',setext) ).

thf(setadjoinIL,axiom,
    ( setadjoinIL
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] : ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6b7ULGU2Gu/E---3.1_1103086.p',setadjoinIL) ).

thf(uniqinunit,axiom,
    ( uniqinunit
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) )
       => ( X3 = X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6b7ULGU2Gu/E---3.1_1103086.p',uniqinunit) ).

thf(eqinunit,axiom,
    ( eqinunit
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
        ( ( X3 = X4 )
       => ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6b7ULGU2Gu/E---3.1_1103086.p',eqinunit) ).

thf(upairset2E,axiom,
    ( upairset2E
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X5 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) ) )
       => ( ( X5 = X3 )
          | ( X5 = X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6b7ULGU2Gu/E---3.1_1103086.p',upairset2E) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setext
     => ( setadjoinIL
       => ( uniqinunit
         => ( eqinunit
           => ( upairset2E
             => ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
                  ( ( X3 = X4 )
                 => ( ( setadjoin @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) )
                    = ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[setukpairinjR11]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X21: $i,X22: $i] :
          ( ! [X23: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X23 @ X21 )
             => ( in @ X23 @ X22 ) )
         => ( ! [X24: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X24 @ X22 )
               => ( in @ X24 @ X21 ) )
           => ( X21 = X22 ) ) )
     => ( ! [X25: $i,X26: $i] : ( in @ X25 @ ( setadjoin @ X25 @ X26 ) )
       => ( ! [X27: $i,X28: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X27 @ ( setadjoin @ X28 @ emptyset ) )
             => ( X27 = X28 ) )
         => ( ! [X29: $i,X30: $i] :
                ( ( X29 = X30 )
               => ( in @ X29 @ ( setadjoin @ X30 @ emptyset ) ) )
           => ( ! [X31: $i,X32: $i,X33: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X33 @ ( setadjoin @ X31 @ ( setadjoin @ X32 @ emptyset ) ) )
                 => ( ( X33 = X31 )
                    | ( X33 = X32 ) ) )
             => ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
                  ( ( X3 = X4 )
                 => ( ( setadjoin @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) )
                    = ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,setext]),setadjoinIL]),uniqinunit]),eqinunit]),upairset2E]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X34: $i,X35: $i,X38: $i,X39: $i,X40: $i,X41: $i,X42: $i,X43: $i,X44: $i,X45: $i,X46: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 ) )
      & ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 ) )
      & ( in @ X38 @ ( setadjoin @ X38 @ X39 ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X40 @ ( setadjoin @ X41 @ emptyset ) )
        | ( X40 = X41 ) )
      & ( ( X42 != X43 )
        | ( in @ X42 @ ( setadjoin @ X43 @ emptyset ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X46 @ ( setadjoin @ X44 @ ( setadjoin @ X45 @ emptyset ) ) )
        | ( X46 = X44 )
        | ( X46 = X45 ) )
      & ( esk3_0 = esk4_0 )
      & ( ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk4_0 @ emptyset ) )
       != ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( X1 = X3 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ X2 )
        = X1 )
      | ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = X2 )
      | ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X1 )
      | ( ( esk2_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( ( esk1_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X1 )
      | ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X1 )
      | ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( X1
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) ) @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk4_0 @ emptyset ) )
   != ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) )
   != ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) )
      = ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU649^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.17  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:03:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6b7ULGU2Gu/E---3.1_1103086.p
% 0.11/0.25  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.11/0.25  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % post_as_ho2 with pid 1103102 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Result found by post_as_ho2
% 0.11/0.25  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.25  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.25  % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFMFNN
% 0.11/0.25  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1103103 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.25  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.25  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.25  % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFMFNN
% 0.11/0.25  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.25  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.25  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.25  
% 0.11/0.25  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.25  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.25  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.25  % Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.11/0.25  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Initial clauses                      : 18
% 0.11/0.25  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.11/0.25  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.11/0.25  % Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.11/0.25  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.11/0.25  % ...remaining for further processing  : 35
% 0.11/0.25  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.11/0.25  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.11/0.25  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.11/0.25  % Generated clauses                    : 88
% 0.11/0.25  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
% 0.11/0.25  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.11/0.25  % Paramodulations                      : 83
% 0.11/0.25  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.11/0.25  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.11/0.25  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Total rewrite steps                  : 38
% 0.11/0.25  % ...of those cached                   : 30
% 0.11/0.25  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.25  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.25  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.25  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.25  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.25  % Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 0.11/0.25  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.11/0.25  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.25  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 0.11/0.25  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.11/0.25  % ...number of literals in the above   : 100
% 0.11/0.25  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.11/0.25  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 247
% 0.11/0.25  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 139
% 0.11/0.25  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
% 0.11/0.25  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.11/0.25  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.11/0.25  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.11/0.25  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.25  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4500
% 0.11/0.25  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 403
% 0.11/0.25  
% 0.11/0.25  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.25  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.25  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.25  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.25  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.11/0.25  
% 0.11/0.25  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.25  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.25  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.25  % Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.11/0.25  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.25  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------