↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU657^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:30:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.30s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  34 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  372 ( 103 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  565 (  27   ~;  16   |;  34   &; 463   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   30 (  26 usr;  13 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;  11  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   90 (  34   ^;  42   !;  14   ?;  90   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    setunion: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    iskpair: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    kpair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    kfst: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    kfstpairEq: $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    ksnd: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ksndpairEq: $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( iskpair
    = ( ^ [X0: $i] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ? [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setunion @ X0 ) )
              & ( X0
                = ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) ) )
          & ( in @ X1 @ ( setunion @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',iskpair) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ( kpair
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kpair) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ( kfstpairEq
    = ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
          = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kfstpairEq) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ( ksndpairEq
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
          = X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ksndpairEq) ).

thf(f5,conjecture,
    ( kfstpairEq
   => ( ksndpairEq
     => ! [X0: $i] :
          ( ( iskpair @ X0 )
         => ( ( kpair @ ( kfst @ X0 ) @ ( ksnd @ X0 ) )
            = X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kpairsurjEq) ).

thf(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( kfstpairEq
     => ( ksndpairEq
       => ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( iskpair @ X0 )
           => ( ( kpair @ ( kfst @ X0 ) @ ( ksnd @ X0 ) )
              = X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( iskpair
    = ( ^ [X0: $i] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ? [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setunion @ X0 ) )
              & ( X0
                = ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) ) )
          & ( in @ X1 @ ( setunion @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( iskpair
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( setunion @ Y0 ) )
              & ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ ( setadjoin @ Y2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
                      = Y0 )
                    & ( in @ Y2 @ ( setunion @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( kfstpairEq
     => ( ksndpairEq
       => ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( iskpair @ X0 )
           => ( ( kpair @ ( kfst @ X0 ) @ ( ksnd @ X0 ) )
              = X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ~ ( ( kfstpairEq = $true )
     => ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
       => ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( ( iskpair @ X0 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( kpair @ ( kfst @ X0 ) @ ( ksnd @ X0 ) )
              = X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( kfstpairEq
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X1 @ X0 ) )
          = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( kfstpairEq = $true )
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        = X1 ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
        = X1 ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( kpair
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( kpair @ ( kfst @ X0 ) @ ( ksnd @ X0 ) )
         != X0 )
        & ( ( iskpair @ X0 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( ksndpairEq = $true )
    & ( kfstpairEq = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
    & ( kfstpairEq = $true )
    & ? [X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( kpair @ ( kfst @ X0 ) @ ( ksnd @ X0 ) )
         != X0 )
        & ( ( iskpair @ X0 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
    & ( kfstpairEq = $true )
    & ( sK0
     != ( kpair @ ( kfst @ sK0 ) @ ( ksnd @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( ( iskpair @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         != X1 ) )
    & ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
          = X1 )
      | ( ksndpairEq != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         != X1 ) )
    & ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X3 ) )
          = X3 )
      | ( ksndpairEq != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
      | ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
       != sK2 ) )
    & ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X3 ) )
          = X3 )
      | ( ksndpairEq != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2)],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ( kfstpairEq = $true )
      | ? [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X1 @ X0 ) )
         != X1 ) )
    & ( ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X1 @ X0 ) )
          = X1 )
      | ( kfstpairEq != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ( kfstpairEq = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         != X0 ) )
    & ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X3 ) )
          = X2 )
      | ( kfstpairEq != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ( kfstpairEq = $true )
      | ( sK3
       != ( kfst @ ( kpair @ sK3 @ sK4 ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X3 ) )
          = X2 )
      | ( kfstpairEq != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK3),skolemize(X1,sK4)],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( kpair
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( iskpair
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( setunion @ Y0 ) )
              & ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ ( setadjoin @ Y2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
                      = Y0 )
                    & ( in @ Y2 @ ( setunion @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( iskpair @ sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( sK0
   != ( kpair @ ( kfst @ sK0 ) @ ( ksnd @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    kfstpairEq = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ksndpairEq = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X3 ) )
        = X3 )
      | ( ksndpairEq != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( kfst @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X3 ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( kfstpairEq != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( sK0
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
      @ ( kfst @ sK0 )
      @ ( ksnd @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f27,f24]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y1 @ ( setunion @ Y0 ) )
              & ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ ( setadjoin @ Y2 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
                      = Y0 )
                    & ( in @ Y2 @ ( setunion @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
      @ sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f26,f25]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( ksnd
          @ ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
            @ X2
            @ X3 ) )
        = X3 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f30,f24,f29]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( kfst
          @ ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
            @ X2
            @ X3 ) )
        = X2 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f32,f24,f28]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ksnd
        @ ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
          @ X2
          @ X3 ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ksnd @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( kfst
        @ ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
          @ X2
          @ X3 ) )
      = X2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( kfst @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) ) )
      = X2 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f44]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ ( kfst @ sK0 ) @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ ( kfst @ sK0 ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( ksnd @ sK0 ) @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
   != sK0 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) )
          & ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
                  = sK0 )
                & ( in @ Y1 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) )
          & ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ ( setadjoin @ Y1 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
                  = sK0 )
                & ( in @ Y1 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) ) ) ) )
      @ sK5 )
    = $true ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK5 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) )
      & ( ?? @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
              = sK0 )
            & ( in @ Y0 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f48]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
            = sK0 )
          & ( in @ Y0 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ Y0 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
            = sK0 )
          & ( in @ Y0 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) ) )
      @ sK6 )
    = $true ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ sK6 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
        = sK0 )
      & ( in @ sK6 @ ( setunion @ sK0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ sK6 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
      = sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f53]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ sK6 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
    = sK0 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f55]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( sK6
    = ( ksnd @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f43,f56]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( kfst @ sK0 )
    = sK5 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f45,f56]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ ( ksnd @ sK0 ) @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
   != sK0 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f46,f60]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ ( setadjoin @ sK5 @ ( setadjoin @ sK6 @ emptyset ) ) @ emptyset ) )
   != sK0 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f62,f58]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f63,f56]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU657^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:03:49 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104523)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104531)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=2292742151:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104534)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104534)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104533)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=873304238:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1937618117:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104528)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3565957999:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104529)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=365711256:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104532)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=3058512790:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104534)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=200129148:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104530)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104528) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1104523-1104528"...
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104533) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1104523-1104533"...
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104529) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1104523-1104529"...
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104532) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1104523-1104532"...
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104528)...printing done.
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104533)...printing done.
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104534) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1104523-1104534"...
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104529)...printing done.
% 0.23/0.30  % (1104528)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.23/0.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.30  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104528)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.23/0.31  % (1104523)Success in time 0.052 s
% 0.23/0.31  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------