%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem : SEU658^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:32:52 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.25s
% Output : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 29
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 47 ( 28 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 318 ( 93 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 561 ( 7 ~; 12 |; 40 &; 433 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 23 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 29 ( 24 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% ( 23 !!; 23 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 133 ( 53 ^; 70 !; 10 ?; 133 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
kpair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
cartprod: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
cartprodmempair1: $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
ksnd: $i > $i ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
ksndpairEq: $o ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
vPI:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_8,type,
vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
db2:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_10,type,
db0:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_11,type,
db1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_12,type,
vSIGMA:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_13,type,
vAND: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_14,type,
db3:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_15,type,
db4:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
vEQ:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_17,type,
vLAM:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).
thf(func_def_23,type,
vNOT: $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_24,type,
sK3: $i > $i > $i > $i ).
thf(func_def_25,type,
sK4: $i > $i > $i > $i ).
thf(f1,axiom,
( cartprodmempair1
= ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
=> ? [X3: $i] :
( ? [X4: $i] :
( ( X2
= ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) )
& ( in @ X4 @ X1 ) )
& ( in @ X3 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cartprodmempair1) ).
thf(f2,axiom,
( ksndpairEq
= ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ksndpairEq) ).
thf(f3,conjecture,
( cartprodmempair1
=> ( ksndpairEq
=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
=> ( in @ ( ksnd @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cartprodsndin) ).
thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cartprodmempair1
=> ( ksndpairEq
=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
=> ( in @ ( ksnd @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
( cartprodmempair1
= ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
=> ? [X3: $i] :
( ? [X4: $i] :
( ( X2
= ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) )
& ( in @ X4 @ X1 ) )
& ( in @ X3 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
( cartprodmempair1
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ ( cartprod @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( in @ Y3 @ Y2 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y4: $i] :
( ( in @ Y4 @ Y1 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y3 @ Y4 )
= Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
( ksndpairEq
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
= Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
~ ( cartprodmempair1
=> ( ksndpairEq
=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
=> ( in @ ( ksnd @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
~ ( ( cartprodmempair1 = $true )
=> ( ( ksndpairEq = $true )
=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true )
=> ( ( in @ ( ksnd @ X2 ) @ X1 )
= $true ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( ( in @ ( ksnd @ X2 ) @ X1 )
!= $true )
& ( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true ) )
& ( ksndpairEq = $true )
& ( cartprodmempair1 = $true ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( ( in @ ( ksnd @ X2 ) @ X1 )
!= $true )
& ( ( in @ X2 @ ( cartprod @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true ) )
& ( ksndpairEq = $true )
& ( cartprodmempair1 = $true ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
( ( $true
!= ( in @ ( ksnd @ sK2 ) @ sK1 ) )
& ( $true
= ( in @ sK2 @ ( cartprod @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) )
& ( ksndpairEq = $true )
& ( cartprodmempair1 = $true ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f11]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
( cartprodmempair1
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ ( cartprod @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( in @ Y3 @ Y2 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y4: $i] :
( ( in @ Y4 @ Y1 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y3 @ Y4 )
= Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
( ksndpairEq
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
= Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
cartprodmempair1 = $true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
ksndpairEq = $true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( $true
= ( in @ sK2 @ ( cartprod @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
( $true
!= ( in @ ( ksnd @ sK2 ) @ sK1 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ ( cartprod @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( in @ Y3 @ Y2 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y4: $i] :
( ( in @ Y4 @ Y1 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y3 @ Y4 )
= Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f15]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
= Y0 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f16]) ).
thf(f23,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
= Y0 ) )
@ X1 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).
thf(f24,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
= X1 ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f23]) ).
thf(f25,plain,
! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
= X1 )
@ X2 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).
thf(f26,plain,
! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X1 ) )
= X1 ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f25]) ).
thf(f27,plain,
! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ksnd @ ( kpair @ X2 @ X1 ) )
= X1 ),
inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).
thf(f28,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ ( cartprod @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( in @ Y3 @ Y2 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y4: $i] :
( ( in @ Y4 @ Y1 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y3 @ Y4 )
= Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
@ X1 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).
thf(f29,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( in @ Y3 @ Y0 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y2 @ Y3 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f28]) ).
thf(f30,plain,
! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( in @ Y3 @ Y0 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y2 @ Y3 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
@ X2 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).
thf(f31,plain,
! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ Y0 @ X2 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y2 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y1 @ Y2 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f30]) ).
thf(f32,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ Y0 @ X2 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( in @ Y1 @ Y0 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( in @ Y2 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y1 @ Y2 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ) )
@ X3 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f31]) ).
thf(f33,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ X3 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( in @ Y1 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y0 @ Y1 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f34,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ X3 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( in @ Y1 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y0 @ Y1 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).
thf(f35,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ X3 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( in @ Y1 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ Y0 @ Y1 )
= X1 ) ) ) )
@ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f34]) ).
thf(f36,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( in @ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
& ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ Y0 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f35]) ).
thf(f37,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ?? @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ Y0 )
= X1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f36]) ).
thf(f39,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( in @ Y0 @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ Y0 )
= X1 ) )
@ ( sK4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f37]) ).
thf(f40,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( in @ ( sK4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
& ( ( kpair @ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( sK4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
= X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f39]) ).
thf(f41,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( kpair @ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( sK4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
= X1 ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).
thf(f42,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $true
= ( in @ ( sK4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).
thf(f43,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( kpair @ ( sK3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( sK4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
= X1 )
| ( $false
= ( in @ X1 @ ( cartprod @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).
thf(f56,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( in @ X0 @ ( cartprod @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( ( sK4 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2 )
= ( ksnd @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f27,f43]) ).
thf(f63,plain,
( ( $true = $false )
| ( ( ksnd @ sK2 )
= ( sK4 @ sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 ) ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f17,f56]) ).
thf(f64,plain,
( ( ksnd @ sK2 )
= ( sK4 @ sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 ) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f63]) ).
thf(f72,plain,
( ( $true
= ( in @ ( ksnd @ sK2 ) @ sK1 ) )
| ( ( in @ sK2 @ ( cartprod @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
= $false ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f42,f64]) ).
thf(f73,plain,
( ( in @ sK2 @ ( cartprod @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
= $false ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f72,f18]) ).
thf(f78,plain,
$true = $false,
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f17,f73]) ).
thf(f79,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f78]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SEU658^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.18 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:06:12 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.19 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.21 Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.21 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.25 % (652953)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1019998760:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)WARNING: Look ahead literal selection is not currently compatible with higher-order. Ignoring request to use
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-652953-652959"...
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.25 % (652958)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3736579667_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.09/0.25 % (652960)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3830356539:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.09/0.25 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.25 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.25 % (652959)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.09/0.25 % (652953)Success in time 0.033 s
% 0.09/0.25 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------