↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU670^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:28:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.49s 1.87s
% Output   : Refutation 3.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   97 (   2   ~;   0   |;   6   &;  76   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   5   ^;  29   !;   4   ?;  38   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(dsetconstr_decl,type,
    dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(dsetconstrEL_decl,type,
    dsetconstrEL: $o ).

thf(kpair_decl,type,
    kpair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(cartprod_decl,type,
    cartprod: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(cartprodpairmemER_decl,type,
    cartprodpairmemER: $o ).

thf(dpsetconstr_decl,type,
    dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(dsetconstrEL_def,definition,
    ( dsetconstrEL
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( in @ C @ ( dsetconstr @ A @ B ) )
         => ( in @ C @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(cartprodpairmemER_def,definition,
    ( cartprodpairmemER
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( in @ ( kpair @ C @ D ) @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
         => ( in @ D @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(dpsetconstr_def,definition,
    ( dpsetconstr
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( cartprod @ A @ B )
          @ ^ [D: $i] :
            ? [E: $i] :
              ( ( in @ E @ A )
              & ? [F: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ F @ B )
                  & ( C @ E @ F )
                  & ( D
                    = ( kpair @ E @ F ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( dsetconstrEL
   => ( cartprodpairmemER
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i > $o,D: $i,E: $i] :
          ( ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ E ) @ ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B @ C ) )
         => ( in @ E @ B ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dpsetconstrEL2) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( dsetconstrEL
     => ( cartprodpairmemER
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i > $o,D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ E ) @ ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B @ C ) )
           => ( in @ E @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( in @ C @ ( dsetconstr @ A @ B ) )
         => ( in @ C @ A ) )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( in @ ( kpair @ C @ D ) @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
           => ( in @ D @ B ) )
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i > $o,D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ E )
              @ ( dsetconstr @ ( cartprod @ A @ B )
                @ ^ [F: $i] :
                  ? [G: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ G @ A )
                    & ? [H: $i] :
                        ( ( in @ H @ B )
                        & ( C @ G @ H )
                        & ( F
                          = ( kpair @ G @ H ) ) ) ) ) )
           => ( in @ E @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU670^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:09:11 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.88/0.76  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.05/0.87  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (112ms). 
% 1.05/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.47/1.07  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.47/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.75/1.14  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.75/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.75/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.75/1.16  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.75/1.16  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.49/1.86  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.49/1.86  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.49/1.87  % Time passed: 1537ms (effective reasoning time: 982ms)
% 3.49/1.87  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.49/1.87  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.49/1.87  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 3.49/1.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1537 ms resp. 982 ms w/o parsing
% 3.81/1.91  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.81/1.91  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------