%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU680^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:00 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.99s 2.32s
% Output : Refutation 3.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 7 def)
% Number of atoms : 60 ( 15 equ; 5 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 19 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 185 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 6 &; 156 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 21 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 7 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 19 ( 16 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 22 ^; 29 !; 3 ?; 54 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(emptyset_decl,type,
emptyset: $i ).
thf(setadjoin_decl,type,
setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(dsetconstr_decl,type,
dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(subset_decl,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(kpair_decl,type,
kpair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(cartprod_decl,type,
cartprod: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_decl,type,
singleton: $i > $o ).
thf(ex1_decl,type,
ex1: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(breln_decl,type,
breln: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(dpsetconstr_decl,type,
dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(func_decl,type,
func: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(funcSet_decl,type,
funcSet: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(funcinfuncset_decl,type,
funcinfuncset: $o ).
thf(lam_decl,type,
lam: $i > $i > ( $i > $i ) > $i ).
thf(lamp_decl,type,
lamp: $o ).
thf(singleton_def,definition,
( singleton
= ( ^ [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ A )
& ( A
= ( setadjoin @ B @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(ex1_def,definition,
( ex1
= ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i > $o] : ( singleton @ ( dsetconstr @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(breln_def,definition,
( breln
= ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( subset @ C @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(func_def,definition,
( func
= ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( breln @ A @ B @ C )
& ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ( ex1 @ B
@ ^ [E: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ E ) @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(funcinfuncset_def,definition,
( funcinfuncset
= ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( func @ A @ B @ C )
=> ( in @ C @ ( funcSet @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(lam_def,definition,
( lam
= ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i] :
( dpsetconstr @ A @ B
@ ^ [D: $i] : ( (=) @ $i @ ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(lamp_def,definition,
( lamp
= ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i] :
( ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ( in @ ( C @ D ) @ B ) )
=> ( func @ A @ B @ ( lam @ A @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
( funcinfuncset
=> ( lamp
=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i] :
( ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ( in @ ( C @ D ) @ B ) )
=> ( in @ ( lam @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( funcSet @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lam2p) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( funcinfuncset
=> ( lamp
=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i] :
( ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ( in @ ( C @ D ) @ B ) )
=> ( in @ ( lam @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( funcSet @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(3,plain,
~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( subset @ C @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
& ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ? [E: $i] :
( ( in @ E
@ ( dsetconstr @ B
@ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) ) )
& ( ( dsetconstr @ B
@ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) )
= ( setadjoin @ E @ emptyset ) ) ) ) )
=> ( in @ C @ ( funcSet @ A @ B ) ) )
=> ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i] :
( ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ( in @ ( C @ D ) @ B ) )
=> ( ( subset
@ ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B
@ ^ [D: $i] : ( (=) @ $i @ ( C @ D ) ) )
@ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
& ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ? [E: $i] :
( ( in @ E
@ ( dsetconstr @ B
@ ^ [F: $i] :
( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F )
@ ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B
@ ^ [G: $i] : ( (=) @ $i @ ( C @ G ) ) ) ) ) )
& ( ( dsetconstr @ B
@ ^ [F: $i] :
( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F )
@ ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B
@ ^ [G: $i] : ( (=) @ $i @ ( C @ G ) ) ) ) )
= ( setadjoin @ E @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) )
=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i > $i] :
( ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ A )
=> ( in @ ( C @ D ) @ B ) )
=> ( in
@ ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B
@ ^ [D: $i] : ( (=) @ $i @ ( C @ D ) ) )
@ ( funcSet @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(29,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU680^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.21 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.21 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.21 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.21 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.21 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.21 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.21 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.21 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:08:24 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.21 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.21 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.84/0.79 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.16/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing done (199ms).
% 1.16/1.00 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.86/1.39 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.06/1.40 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.22/1.53 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.22/1.56 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.22/1.56 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.22/1.57 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.22/1.57 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.99/2.32 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.99/2.32 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.99/2.32 % Time passed: 1968ms (effective reasoning time: 1310ms)
% 3.99/2.32 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.99/2.32 % Axioms used in derivation (0):
% 3.99/2.32 % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 3.99/2.32 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1968 ms resp. 1310 ms w/o parsing
% 3.99/2.38 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.99/2.38 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------