↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU687^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.23s 2.40s
% Output   : Refutation 4.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  294 (   2   ~;   0   |;  10   &; 238   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  44  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   22 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (  18   ^;  44   !;   5   ?;  67   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(emptyset_decl,type,
    emptyset: $i ).

thf(setadjoin_decl,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(dsetconstr_decl,type,
    dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(subset_decl,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(kpair_decl,type,
    kpair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(cartprod_decl,type,
    cartprod: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $o ).

thf(ex1_decl,type,
    ex1: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(breln_decl,type,
    breln: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_decl,type,
    func: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(ap_decl,type,
    ap: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(funcGraphProp1_decl,type,
    funcGraphProp1: $o ).

thf(funcGraphProp2_decl,type,
    funcGraphProp2: $o ).

thf(singleton_def,definition,
    ( singleton
    = ( ^ [A: $i] :
        ? [B: $i] :
          ( ( in @ B @ A )
          & ( A
            = ( setadjoin @ B @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(ex1_def,definition,
    ( ex1
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i > $o] : ( singleton @ ( dsetconstr @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(breln_def,definition,
    ( breln
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( subset @ C @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(func_def,definition,
    ( func
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( breln @ A @ B @ C )
          & ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ( ex1 @ B
                @ ^ [E: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ E ) @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(funcGraphProp1_def,definition,
    ( funcGraphProp1
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( func @ A @ B @ C )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ ( ap @ A @ B @ C @ D ) ) @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(funcGraphProp2_def,definition,
    ( funcGraphProp2
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( func @ A @ B @ C )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ! [E: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ E @ B )
                 => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ E ) @ C )
                   => ( ( ap @ A @ B @ C @ D )
                      = E ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( funcGraphProp1
   => ( funcGraphProp2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( func @ A @ B @ C )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( func @ A @ B @ D )
             => ( ! [E: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ E @ A )
                   => ( ( ap @ A @ B @ C @ E )
                      = ( ap @ A @ B @ D @ E ) ) )
               => ! [E: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ E @ A )
                   => ! [F: $i] :
                        ( ( in @ F @ B )
                       => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ F ) @ D )
                         => ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ F ) @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',funcextLem) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( funcGraphProp1
     => ( funcGraphProp2
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( func @ A @ B @ C )
           => ! [D: $i] :
                ( ( func @ A @ B @ D )
               => ( ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ E @ A )
                     => ( ( ap @ A @ B @ C @ E )
                        = ( ap @ A @ B @ D @ E ) ) )
                 => ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ E @ A )
                     => ! [F: $i] :
                          ( ( in @ F @ B )
                         => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ F ) @ D )
                           => ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ F ) @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( ( subset @ C @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
            & ! [D: $i] :
                ( ( in @ D @ A )
               => ? [E: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ E
                      @ ( dsetconstr @ B
                        @ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) ) )
                    & ( ( dsetconstr @ B
                        @ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) )
                      = ( setadjoin @ E @ emptyset ) ) ) ) )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ ( ap @ A @ B @ C @ D ) ) @ C ) ) )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( subset @ C @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
              & ! [D: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ D @ A )
                 => ? [E: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ E
                        @ ( dsetconstr @ B
                          @ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) ) )
                      & ( ( dsetconstr @ B
                          @ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) )
                        = ( setadjoin @ E @ emptyset ) ) ) ) )
           => ! [D: $i] :
                ( ( in @ D @ A )
               => ! [E: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ E @ B )
                   => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ E ) @ C )
                     => ( ( ap @ A @ B @ C @ D )
                        = E ) ) ) ) )
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( subset @ C @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
              & ! [D: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ D @ A )
                 => ? [E: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ E
                        @ ( dsetconstr @ B
                          @ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) ) )
                      & ( ( dsetconstr @ B
                          @ ^ [F: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ D @ F ) @ C ) )
                        = ( setadjoin @ E @ emptyset ) ) ) ) )
           => ! [D: $i] :
                ( ( ( subset @ D @ ( cartprod @ A @ B ) )
                  & ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ E @ A )
                     => ? [F: $i] :
                          ( ( in @ F
                            @ ( dsetconstr @ B
                              @ ^ [G: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ G ) @ D ) ) )
                          & ( ( dsetconstr @ B
                              @ ^ [G: $i] : ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ G ) @ D ) )
                            = ( setadjoin @ F @ emptyset ) ) ) ) )
               => ( ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ E @ A )
                     => ( ( ap @ A @ B @ C @ E )
                        = ( ap @ A @ B @ D @ E ) ) )
                 => ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ E @ A )
                     => ! [F: $i] :
                          ( ( in @ F @ B )
                         => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ F ) @ D )
                           => ( in @ ( kpair @ E @ F ) @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU687^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:08:46 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (207ms). 
% 1.17/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.02/1.40  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.02/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.19/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.19/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.19/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.19/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.19/1.59  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.93/2.39  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.93/2.39  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.93/2.39  % Time passed: 2044ms (effective reasoning time: 1372ms)
% 3.93/2.39  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.93/2.40  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.93/2.40  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 4.23/2.40  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2044 ms resp. 1372 ms w/o parsing
% 4.23/2.46  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.23/2.46  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------