↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU694^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:36:27 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.64s 1.34s
% Output   : Refutation 1.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   2 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  26 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   9 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  178 (  11   ~;   0   |;  12   &; 145   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0   ^;  16   !;  14   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    func: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    ap: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(f14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3 )
   != ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3 )
     != ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    & ( ( in @ sK3 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( func @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f7,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ? [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 )
             != ( ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 ) )
            & ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
              = $true ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( func @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 ) ) )
   => ( ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3 )
           != ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) ) )
      & ( ( func @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X3: $i] :
        ( ( ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3 )
         != ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3 )
       != ( ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3 ) )
      & ( ( in @ sK3 @ sK1 )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 )
           != ( ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 ) )
          & ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
            = $true ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( func @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3 )
           != ( ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
          & ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( func @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( func @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
       => ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3 )
              = ( ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( func @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
       => ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           => ( ( ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3 )
              = ( ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( func @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           => ( ( ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
              = ( ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( func @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
         => ( ( ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
            = ( ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z3xuX8F1WD/DTF2THF_8143.p',ap2apEq2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU694^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:30:23 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  % File     : SEU694^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.19/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.47  % Problem  : Functions - Extensionality and Beta Reduction
% 0.19/0.47  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.47  % English  : (! A:i.! B:i.! f:i.func A B f -> (! x:i.in x A ->
% 0.19/0.47  %            ap A B f x = ap A B f x))
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.47  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.19/0.47  % Names    : ZFC196l [Bro08]
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.19/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    3 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of connectives :   15 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  13   @)
% 0.19/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   0 con; 2-4 aty)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.19/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=358
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  thf(in,type,
% 0.19/0.47      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(func,type,
% 0.19/0.47      func: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(ap,type,
% 0.19/0.47      ap: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(ap2apEq2,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.47      ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xf: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47        ( ( func @ A @ B @ Xf )
% 0.19/0.47       => ! [Xx: $i] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.19/0.47           => ( ( ap @ A @ B @ Xf @ Xx )
% 0.19/0.47              = ( ap @ A @ B @ Xf @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.64/1.32  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.64/1.32  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.64/1.32  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:30:24 EST 2026
% 1.64/1.32  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.64/1.32  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.64/1.32  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.64/1.32  
% 1.64/1.32  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z3xuX8F1WD/DTF2DTF8143.p
% See solution above
% 1.64/1.32  ------------------------
% 1.64/1.33  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.64/1.33  thf(in,type,
% 1.64/1.33      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.64/1.33  
% 1.64/1.33  thf(func,type,
% 1.64/1.33      func: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.64/1.33  
% 1.64/1.33  thf(ap,type,
% 1.64/1.33      ap: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).
% 1.64/1.33  
% 1.64/1.33  thf(ap2apEq2,conjecture,
% 1.64/1.33      ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xf: $i] :
% 1.64/1.33        ( ( func @ A @ B @ Xf )
% 1.64/1.33       => ! [Xx: $i] :
% 1.64/1.33            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.64/1.33           => ( ( ap @ A @ B @ Xf @ Xx )
% 1.64/1.33              = ( ap @ A @ B @ Xf @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.64/1.33  ------------------------
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8143 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)First to succeed.
% 1.64/1.34  % (8289)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8143 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.64/1.34  % (8284)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8143 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.64/1.34  % (8289)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.64/1.34  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_8143
% 1.64/1.34  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_8143
% 1.64/1.34  thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(func_def_1, type, func: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(func_def_2, type, ap: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    $false),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    ((ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3) != (ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3))),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    (((ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3) != (ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3)) & ((in @ sK3 @ sK1) = $true)) & ((func @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0) = $true)),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f7,f9,f8])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (? [X3 : $i] : (((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3) != (ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ X1) = $true)) & ($true = (func @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))) => (? [X3 : $i] : (((ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3) != (ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3)) & ($true = (in @ X3 @ sK1))) & ((func @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0) = $true))),
% 1.64/1.34    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    ? [X3 : $i] : (((ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3) != (ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ X3)) & ($true = (in @ X3 @ sK1))) => (((ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3) != (ap @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK0 @ sK3)) & ((in @ sK3 @ sK1) = $true))),
% 1.64/1.34    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (? [X3 : $i] : (((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3) != (ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ X1) = $true)) & ($true = (func @ X1 @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    ? [X1 : $i,X0 : $i,X2 : $i] : (? [X3 : $i] : (((ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3) != (ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true)) & ($true = (func @ X0 @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    ~! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (func @ X0 @ X2 @ X1)) => ! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true) => ((ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3) = (ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3))))),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.64/1.34    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((func @ X0 @ X2 @ X1) => ! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X0) => ((ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3) = (ap @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3))))),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.64/1.34    ~! [X0 : $i,X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((func @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) => ! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X0) => ((ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3) = (ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3))))),
% 1.64/1.34    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.64/1.34  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.64/1.34    ! [X0 : $i,X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((func @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) => ! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X0) => ((ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3) = (ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3))))),
% 1.64/1.34    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z3xuX8F1WD/DTF2THF_8143.p',ap2apEq2)).
% 1.64/1.34  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_8143
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)------------------------------
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.64/1.34  
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)------------------------------
% 1.64/1.34  % (8290)------------------------------
% 1.64/1.34  % (8283)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------