↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU697^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:36:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.52s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 1.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   2 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (  19 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  141 (  12   ~;   4   |;   4   &; 112   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (  18   ^;  20   !;   6   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    lam: $i > $i > ( $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK2: $i > $i ).

thf(f13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( lam @ sK1 @ sK0
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
   != ( lam @ sK1 @ sK0
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( lam @ sK1 @ sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
     != ( lam @ sK1 @ sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X3 ) @ sK0 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ( lam @ X1 @ X0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) )
         != ( lam @ X1 @ X0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X0 ) )
            | ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
             != $true ) ) )
   => ( ( ( lam @ sK1 @ sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
       != ( lam @ sK1 @ sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X3 ) @ sK0 ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( lam @ X1 @ X0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) )
       != ( lam @ X1 @ X0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X0 ) )
          | ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
              = $true )
           => ( $true
              = ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X0 ) ) )
       => ( ( lam @ X1 @ X0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) )
          = ( lam @ X1 @ X0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           => ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X0 ) )
       => ( ( lam @ X1 @ X0
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( X2 @ X4 ) )
          = ( lam @ X1 @ X0
            @ ^ [X5: $i] : ( X2 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           => ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 ) )
       => ( ( lam @ X0 @ X1
            @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ X3 ) )
          = ( lam @ X0 @ X1
            @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
         => ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 ) )
     => ( ( lam @ X0 @ X1
          @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ X3 ) )
        = ( lam @ X0 @ X1
          @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LpA2BnLise/DTF2THF_6945.p',lam2lamEq) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SEU697^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/0.29  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:31:33 EST 2026
% 0.11/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.29  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.38  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.17/0.38  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.17/0.38  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.38  % File     : SEU697^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.17/0.38  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.17/0.38  % Problem  : Functions - Extensionality and Beta Reduction
% 0.17/0.38  % Version  : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.17/0.38  % English  : (! A:i.! B:i.! f:i>i.(! x:i.in x A -> in (f x) B) ->
% 0.17/0.38  %            lam A B (^ x:i.f x) = lam A B (^ x:i.f x))
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  % Refs     : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.17/0.38  % Source   : [Bro08]
% 0.17/0.38  % Names    : ZFC199l [Bro08]
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.17/0.38  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.17/0.38  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   1 unt;   3 typ;   1 def)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Number of atoms       :    5 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Number of connectives :   19 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  17   @)
% 0.17/0.38  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   0 con; 2-3 aty)
% 0.17/0.38  %            Number of variables   :   11 (   7   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;  11   :)
% 0.17/0.38  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  % Comments : http://mathgate.info/detsetitem.php?id=249
% 0.17/0.38  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.38  thf(in_type,type,
% 0.17/0.38      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  thf(dpsetconstr_type,type,
% 0.17/0.38      dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  thf(lam_type,type,
% 0.17/0.38      lam: $i > $i > ( $i > $i ) > $i ).
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  thf(lam,definition,
% 0.17/0.38      ( lam
% 0.17/0.38      = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,Xf: $i > $i] :
% 0.17/0.38            ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B
% 0.17/0.38            @ ^ [Xx: $i,Xy: $i] :
% 0.17/0.38                ( ( Xf @ Xx )
% 0.17/0.38                = Xy ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  thf(lam2lamEq,conjecture,
% 0.17/0.38      ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xf: $i > $i] :
% 0.17/0.38        ( ! [Xx: $i] :
% 0.17/0.38            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 0.17/0.38           => ( in @ ( Xf @ Xx ) @ B ) )
% 0.17/0.38       => ( ( lam @ A @ B
% 0.17/0.38            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xf @ Xx ) )
% 0.17/0.38          = ( lam @ A @ B
% 0.17/0.38            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xf @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.38  ------------------------
% 1.39/1.27  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.39/1.27  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.39/1.27  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:31:34 EST 2026
% 1.39/1.27  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.39/1.27  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.39/1.27  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.39/1.27  
% 1.39/1.27  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LpA2BnLise/DTF2DTF6945.p
% See solution above
% 1.39/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.39/1.28  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.39/1.28  thf(in_type,type,
% 1.39/1.28      in: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.39/1.28  
% 1.39/1.28  thf(dpsetconstr_type,type,
% 1.39/1.28      dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).
% 1.39/1.28  
% 1.39/1.28  thf(lam_type,type,
% 1.39/1.28      lam: $i > $i > ( $i > $i ) > $i ).
% 1.39/1.28  
% 1.39/1.28  thf(lam,definition,
% 1.39/1.28      ( lam
% 1.39/1.28      = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i,Xf: $i > $i] :
% 1.39/1.28            ( dpsetconstr @ A @ B
% 1.39/1.28            @ ^ [Xx: $i,Xy: $i] :
% 1.39/1.28                ( ( Xf @ Xx )
% 1.39/1.28                = Xy ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.39/1.28  
% 1.39/1.28  thf(lam2lamEq,conjecture,
% 1.39/1.28      ! [A: $i,B: $i,Xf: $i > $i] :
% 1.39/1.28        ( ! [Xx: $i] :
% 1.39/1.28            ( ( in @ Xx @ A )
% 1.39/1.28           => ( in @ ( Xf @ Xx ) @ B ) )
% 1.39/1.28       => ( ( lam @ A @ B
% 1.39/1.28            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xf @ Xx ) )
% 1.39/1.28          = ( lam @ A @ B
% 1.39/1.28            @ ^ [Xx: $i] : ( Xf @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.39/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.39/1.30  % (7046)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_6945 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.39/1.30  % (7044)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_6945 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.39/1.30  % (7043)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_6945 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.39/1.30  % (7045)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_6945 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.39/1.30  % (7048)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_6945 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.39/1.30  % (7047)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_6945 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.52/1.30  % (7049)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_6945 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)First to succeed.
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)------------------------------
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.52/1.30  
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)------------------------------
% 1.52/1.30  % (7047)------------------------------
% 1.52/1.30  % (7043)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.52/1.30  % (7049)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.52/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_6945
% 1.52/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_6945
% 1.52/1.30  thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(func_def_1, type, dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(func_def_2, type, lam: $i > $i > ($i > $i) > $i).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(func_def_13, type, sK2: $i > $i).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.52/1.30    $false),
% 1.52/1.30    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.52/1.30    ((lam @ sK1 @ sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK2 @ Y0))) != (lam @ sK1 @ sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK2 @ Y0))))),
% 1.52/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.52/1.30    ((lam @ sK1 @ sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK2 @ Y0))) != (lam @ sK1 @ sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK2 @ Y0)))) & ! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (in @ (sK2 @ X3) @ sK0)) | ($true != (in @ X3 @ sK1)))),
% 1.52/1.30    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f9])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.52/1.30    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (((lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0))) != (lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) & ! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (in @ (X2 @ X3) @ X0)) | ((in @ X3 @ X1) != $true))) => (((lam @ sK1 @ sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK2 @ Y0))) != (lam @ sK1 @ sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK2 @ Y0)))) & ! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (in @ (sK2 @ X3) @ sK0)) | ($true != (in @ X3 @ sK1))))),
% 1.52/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.52/1.30    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (((lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0))) != (lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))) & ! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (in @ (X2 @ X3) @ X0)) | ((in @ X3 @ X1) != $true)))),
% 1.52/1.30    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.52/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (! [X3 : $i] : (((in @ X3 @ X1) = $true) => ($true = (in @ (X2 @ X3) @ X0))) => ((lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0))) = (lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ Y0)))))),
% 1.52/1.30    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.52/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X1) => (in @ (X2 @ X3) @ X0)) => ((lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[X4 : $i] : (X2 @ X4))) = (lam @ X1 @ X0 @ (^[X5 : $i] : (X2 @ X5)))))),
% 1.52/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.52/1.30    ~! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X0) => (in @ (X2 @ X3) @ X1)) => ((lam @ X0 @ X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ X3))) = (lam @ X0 @ X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ X3)))))),
% 1.52/1.30    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2])).
% 1.52/1.30  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 1.52/1.30    ! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (! [X3 : $i] : ((in @ X3 @ X0) => (in @ (X2 @ X3) @ X1)) => ((lam @ X0 @ X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ X3))) = (lam @ X0 @ X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ X3)))))),
% 1.52/1.30    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LpA2BnLise/DTF2THF_6945.p',lam2lamEq)).
% 1.52/1.30  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_6945
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)------------------------------
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.52/1.30  
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)------------------------------
% 1.52/1.30  % (7048)------------------------------
% 1.52/1.30  % (7042)Success in time 0.016 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------