↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU709_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:26:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU709_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.45  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:53:32 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.55  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % new_bool_1 with pid 2313876 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.23/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.55  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2313878 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.55  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.55  
% 0.23/0.55  % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_23, type, in: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_24, type, emptyset: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_25, type, setadjoin: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_26, type, setadjoinIL: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_27, type, in__Cong: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_28, type, secondinupair: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_29, type, if: ($i * $o * $i * $i) > $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_30, type, iftrue: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_31, type, iffalse: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_32, type, esk1_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_33, type, epred1_0: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_34, type, esk2_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_35, type, esk3_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_36, type, esk4_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_37, type, esk5_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_38, type, esk6_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_39, type, esk7_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_40, type, esk8_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_41, type, epred2_0: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_42, type, esk9_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_43, type, esk10_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_44, type, esk11_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_45, type, epred3_0: $o).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_46, type, esk12_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  tff(decl_47, type, esk13_0: $i).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(iftrueorfalse, conjecture, (setadjoinIL=>(in__Cong=>(secondinupair=>(iftrue=>(iffalse=>![X3, X5:$o, X1]:((in(X1,X3)=>![X2]:((in(X2,X3)=>in(if(X3,X5,X1,X2),setadjoin(X1,setadjoin(X2,emptyset)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', iftrueorfalse)).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(iffalse, axiom, (iffalse<=>![X3, X5:$o, X1]:((in(X1,X3)=>![X2]:((in(X2,X3)=>(~(X5)=>if(X3,X5,X1,X2)=X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', iffalse)).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(iftrue, axiom, (iftrue<=>![X3, X5:$o, X1]:((in(X1,X3)=>![X2]:((in(X2,X3)=>(X5=>if(X3,X5,X1,X2)=X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', iftrue)).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(setadjoinIL, axiom, (setadjoinIL<=>![X1, X2]:(in(X1,setadjoin(X1,X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', setadjoinIL)).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(secondinupair, axiom, (secondinupair<=>![X1, X2]:(in(X2,setadjoin(X1,setadjoin(X2,emptyset))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', secondinupair)).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((setadjoinIL=>(in__Cong=>(secondinupair=>(iftrue=>(iffalse=>![X3, X5:$o, X1]:((in(X1,X3)=>![X2]:((in(X2,X3)=>in(if(X3,X5,X1,X2),setadjoin(X1,setadjoin(X2,emptyset))))))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[iftrueorfalse])).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(c_0_6, plain, (iffalse<=>![X3, X5:$o, X1]:((in(X1,X3)=>![X2]:((in(X2,X3)=>(~X5=>if(X3,X5,X1,X2)=X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[iffalse])).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X18, X19:$o, X20, X21]:(((~iftrue|(~in(X20,X18)|(~in(X21,X18)|(~X19|if(X18,X19,X20,X21)=X20))))&((in(esk9_0,esk8_0)|iftrue)&((in(esk10_0,esk8_0)|iftrue)&((epred2_0|iftrue)&(((~epred2_0|epred2_0|iftrue)&(if(esk8_0,$false,esk9_0,esk10_0)!=esk9_0|epred2_0|iftrue))&((~epred2_0|if(esk8_0,$true,esk9_0,esk10_0)!=esk9_0|iftrue)&(if(esk8_0,$false,esk9_0,esk10_0)!=esk9_0|if(esk8_0,$true,esk9_0,esk10_0)!=esk9_0|iftrue)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[iftrue])])])])])])])).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (setadjoinIL&(in__Cong&(secondinupair&(iftrue&(iffalse&(in(esk2_0,esk1_0)&(in(esk3_0,esk1_0)&(((~epred1_0|epred1_0)&(~in(if(esk1_0,$false,esk2_0,esk3_0),setadjoin(esk2_0,setadjoin(esk3_0,emptyset)))|epred1_0))&((~epred1_0|~in(if(esk1_0,$true,esk2_0,esk3_0),setadjoin(esk2_0,setadjoin(esk3_0,emptyset))))&(~in(if(esk1_0,$false,esk2_0,esk3_0),setadjoin(esk2_0,setadjoin(esk3_0,emptyset)))|~in(if(esk1_0,$true,esk2_0,esk3_0),setadjoin(esk2_0,setadjoin(esk3_0,emptyset))))))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X10, X11]:(((~setadjoinIL|in(X10,setadjoin(X10,X11)))&(~in(esk4_0,setadjoin(esk4_0,esk5_0))|setadjoinIL))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[setadjoinIL])])])])])).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X26, X27:$o, X28, X29]:(((~iffalse|(~in(X28,X26)|(~in(X29,X26)|(X27|if(X26,X27,X28,X29)=X29))))&((in(esk12_0,esk11_0)|iffalse)&((in(esk13_0,esk11_0)|iffalse)&((~epred3_0|iffalse)&(((~epred3_0|epred3_0|iffalse)&(if(esk11_0,$false,esk12_0,esk13_0)!=esk13_0|epred3_0|iffalse))&((~epred3_0|if(esk11_0,$true,esk12_0,esk13_0)!=esk13_0|iffalse)&(if(esk11_0,$false,esk12_0,esk13_0)!=esk13_0|if(esk11_0,$true,esk12_0,esk13_0)!=esk13_0|iffalse)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])])).
% 0.23/0.55  fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X14, X15]:(((~secondinupair|in(X15,setadjoin(X14,setadjoin(X15,emptyset))))&(~in(esk7_0,setadjoin(esk6_0,setadjoin(esk7_0,emptyset)))|secondinupair))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[secondinupair])])])])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_12, plain, (if(X2,$true,X1,X3)=X1|~iftrue|~in(X1,X2)|~in(X3,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (iftrue), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_14, plain, (in(X1,setadjoin(X1,X2))|~setadjoinIL), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (setadjoinIL), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_16, plain, (if(X2,$false,X1,X3)=X3|~iffalse|~in(X1,X2)|~in(X3,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (iffalse), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_18, plain, (in(X1,setadjoin(X2,setadjoin(X1,emptyset)))|~secondinupair), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (secondinupair), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (~epred1_0|~in(if(esk1_0,$true,esk2_0,esk3_0),setadjoin(esk2_0,setadjoin(esk3_0,emptyset)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_21, plain, (if(X1,$true,X2,X3)=X2|~in(X3,X1)|~in(X2,X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_22, plain, (in(X1,setadjoin(X1,X2))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (in(esk3_0,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (in(esk2_0,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0|~in(if(esk1_0,$false,esk2_0,esk3_0),setadjoin(esk2_0,setadjoin(esk3_0,emptyset)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_26, plain, (if(X1,$false,X2,X3)=X3|~in(X3,X1)|~in(X2,X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_27, plain, (in(X1,setadjoin(X2,setadjoin(X1,emptyset)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (~epred1_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_22]), c_0_23]), c_0_24])])).
% 0.23/0.55  cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_27]), c_0_23]), c_0_24])]), c_0_28]), ['proof']).
% 0.23/0.55  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.23/0.55  % Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.23/0.55  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9
% 0.23/0.55  % Initial clauses                      : 37
% 0.23/0.55  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.23/0.55  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 32
% 0.23/0.55  % Processed clauses                    : 30
% 0.23/0.55  % ...of these trivial                  : 16
% 0.23/0.55  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % ...remaining for further processing  : 14
% 0.23/0.55  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.23/0.55  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.23/0.55  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.23/0.55  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.23/0.55  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Total rewrite steps                  : 28
% 0.23/0.55  % ...of those cached                   : 17
% 0.23/0.55  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55  % Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 0.23/0.55  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.23/0.55  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.55  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/0.55  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.23/0.55  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.23/0.55  % ...number of literals in the above   : 8
% 0.23/0.55  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.23/0.55  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.23/0.55  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.23/0.55  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/0.55  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2087
% 0.23/0.55  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 684
% 0.23/0.55  
% 0.23/0.55  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.55  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.55  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.55  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.55  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.23/0.55  
% 0.23/0.55  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.55  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.23/0.55  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.55  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.23/0.55  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.55  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------