↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU720^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:33:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  245 (  55 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  360 (  31   ~;   8   |;  12   &; 251   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  43  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  15  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (  18   ^;  42   !;   6   ?;  66   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    setminus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    setminusI: $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( setminusI
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
           => ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setminusI) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( setminusI
   => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
       => ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
             => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',complementTE1) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setminusI
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
               => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( setminusI
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
           => ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( setminusI
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                 => ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ( setminusI
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
             => ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
               => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( ( setminusI = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
            = $true )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
                 != $true )
               => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                  = $true ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ( ( setminusI = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
            = $true )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
                 != $true )
               => ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
                  = $true ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
             != $true )
            & ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
        & ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( setminusI = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
             != $true )
            & ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
        & ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( setminusI = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( in @ sK2 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ ( powerset @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( setminusI = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( setminusI
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                 => ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    setminusI = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( in @ sK2 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                 => ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f12,f13]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                     => ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X1 @ Y1 )
               => ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
                 => ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X1 @ Y1 )
               => ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
                 => ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
           => ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
             => ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y0 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
           => ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
             => ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        @ X3 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( in @ X1 @ X3 )
       => ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
         => ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
         => ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f16,f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( in @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK2 @ sK0 )
    = $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f31,f17]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f15,f32]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f34]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU720^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:17:32 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222595)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222600)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=933927362_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.09/0.26  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.09/0.26  User error: Finite model building is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222601)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222602)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3383986692:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222601)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=730387472:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222603)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=3291833788:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222604)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=65264387:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222601)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222604)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222601)WARNING: Look ahead literal selection is not currently compatible with higher-order. Ignoring request to use
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1889314632:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3222595-3222605"...
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222603) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3222595-3222603"...
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222604) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3222595-3222604"...
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222601) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3222595-3222601"...
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222602) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3222595-3222602"...
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.09/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222605)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.09/0.26  % (3222595)Success in time 0.041 s
% 0.09/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------