↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU723^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:33:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   25
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  30 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  393 (  90 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  535 (  21   ~;  12   |;  21   &; 382   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  69  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   22 (  18 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  30  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  116 (  36   ^;  72   !;   8   ?; 116   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    subsetE: $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    setminus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    setminusER: $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( subsetE
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( subset @ X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subsetE) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ( setminusER
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         => ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setminusER) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ( subsetE
   => ( setminusER
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
             => ! [X3: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                 => ( ( subset @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                   => ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
                     => ~ ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contrasubsetT) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( subsetE
     => ( setminusER
       => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
           => ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
               => ! [X3: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                   => ( ( subset @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                     => ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
                       => ~ ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( subsetE
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( subset @ X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
           => ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( subsetE
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( subset @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                 => ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( setminusER
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         => ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( setminusER
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
                 => ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( subsetE
     => ( setminusER
       => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
           => ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
               => ! [X3: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                   => ( ( subset @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                     => ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
                       => ~ ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ~ ( ( subsetE = $true )
     => ( ( setminusER = $true )
       => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
              = $true )
           => ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
                  = $true )
               => ! [X3: $i] :
                    ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                      = $true )
                   => ( ( ( subset @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                        = $true )
                     => ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
                          = $true )
                       => ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
                         != $true ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ~ ( ( subsetE = $true )
     => ( ( setminusER = $true )
       => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
              = $true )
           => ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
                  = $true )
               => ! [X3: $i] :
                    ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                      = $true )
                   => ( ( ( subset @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                        = $true )
                     => ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
                          = $true )
                       => ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
                         != $true ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ? [X3: $i] :
                ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( subset @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                  = $true ) )
            & ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
              = $true ) )
        & ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( setminusER = $true )
    & ( subsetE = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ? [X3: $i] :
                ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( subset @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                  = $true ) )
            & ( ( in @ X2 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
              = $true ) )
        & ( ( in @ X1 @ ( powerset @ X0 ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( setminusER = $true )
    & ( subsetE = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( in @ sK3 @ sK1 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK3 @ sK2 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( subset @ sK1 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK2 @ ( powerset @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK1 @ ( powerset @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( setminusER = $true )
    & ( subsetE = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3)],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( subsetE
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( subset @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                 => ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( setminusER
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
                 => ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    subsetE = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    setminusER = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( subset @ sK1 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ sK3 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ sK3 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( subset @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                 => ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                   => ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f15,f17]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
                 => ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f16,f18]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y0 @ ( setminus @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
                   => ~ ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
               => ~ ( in @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
               => ~ ( in @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y0 @ X2 ) )
           => ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ Y0 @ X2 ) )
           => ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
        @ X3 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X2 ) )
       => ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( subset @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                   => ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                     => ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( subset @ Y1 @ Y0 )
               => ( ( in @ X1 @ Y1 )
                 => ( in @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( subset @ Y1 @ Y0 )
               => ( ( in @ X1 @ Y1 )
                 => ( in @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( subset @ Y0 @ X2 )
           => ( ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( subset @ Y0 @ X2 )
           => ( ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
        @ X3 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( subset @ X3 @ X2 )
       => ( ( in @ X1 @ X3 )
         => ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( subset @ X3 @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( in @ X1 @ X3 )
         => ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( subset @ X3 @ X2 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X0 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ X0 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f22,f44]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ X0 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f137,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X0 @ sK2 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f36,f98]) ).

thf(f140,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( in @ X0 @ sK2 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f137]) ).

thf(f177,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( in @ sK3 @ sK1 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f23,f140]) ).

thf(f178,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK3 @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f177]) ).

thf(f193,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f24,f178]) ).

thf(f194,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f193]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU723^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.19  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:17:39 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.23  Running first-order model finding
% 0.10/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223733)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=205319901:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223739)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3223733-3223740"...
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223740)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.21/0.27  % (3223733)Success in time 0.036 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------