↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU764^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.68s 2.14s
% Output   : Refutation 3.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  223 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 188   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  33  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0   ^;  33   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(powerset_decl,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

thf(binunion_decl,type,
    binunion: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(binintersect_decl,type,
    binintersect: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(setminus_decl,type,
    setminus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(binunionT_lem_decl,type,
    binunionT_lem: $o ).

thf(demorgan1_decl,type,
    demorgan1: $o ).

thf(demorgan2_decl,type,
    demorgan2: $o ).

thf(binunionT_lem_def,definition,
    ( binunionT_lem
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
             => ( in @ ( binunion @ B @ C ) @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(demorgan1_def,definition,
    ( demorgan1
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
             => ( ( setminus @ A @ ( binintersect @ B @ C ) )
                = ( binunion @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(demorgan2_def,definition,
    ( demorgan2
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
             => ( ( setminus @ A @ ( binunion @ B @ C ) )
                = ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( binunionT_lem
   => ( demorgan1
     => ( demorgan2
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
           => ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
               => ! [D: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ D @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                   => ! [E: $i] :
                        ( ( in @ E @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                       => ( ( setminus @ A @ ( binintersect @ ( binunion @ B @ C ) @ ( binunion @ D @ E ) ) )
                          = ( binunion @ ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) ) @ ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ D ) @ ( setminus @ A @ E ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',woz1_2) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( binunionT_lem
     => ( demorgan1
       => ( demorgan2
         => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
              ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
             => ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                 => ! [D: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ D @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                     => ! [E: $i] :
                          ( ( in @ E @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                         => ( ( setminus @ A @ ( binintersect @ ( binunion @ B @ C ) @ ( binunion @ D @ E ) ) )
                            = ( binunion @ ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) ) @ ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ D ) @ ( setminus @ A @ E ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
             => ( in @ ( binunion @ B @ C ) @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
           => ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
               => ( ( setminus @ A @ ( binintersect @ B @ C ) )
                  = ( binunion @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) ) ) ) )
       => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
              ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
             => ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                 => ( ( setminus @ A @ ( binunion @ B @ C ) )
                    = ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) ) ) ) )
         => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
              ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
             => ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                 => ! [D: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ D @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                     => ! [E: $i] :
                          ( ( in @ E @ ( powerset @ A ) )
                         => ( ( setminus @ A @ ( binintersect @ ( binunion @ B @ C ) @ ( binunion @ D @ E ) ) )
                            = ( binunion @ ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ B ) @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) ) @ ( binintersect @ ( setminus @ A @ D ) @ ( setminus @ A @ E ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU764^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.22  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:22:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.99/0.81  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.19/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (185ms). 
% 1.19/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.90/1.39  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.12/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.30/1.53  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.30/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.30/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.30/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.30/1.58  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.68/2.13  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.68/2.13  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.68/2.13  % Time passed: 1766ms (effective reasoning time: 1109ms)
% 3.68/2.13  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.68/2.13  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.68/2.13  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 3.68/2.14  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1766 ms resp. 1109 ms w/o parsing
% 3.68/2.18  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.68/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------